Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[Rico1304]

I’m not sure sending the sample to Russia makes any sense.

[Numero Veinticinco]

I’m not sure sending the sample to Russia makes any sense.

Why did you post that, mate? Has there been an update? I agree, BTW. It needs to be sorted by a neutral, independent party.

[SasaS]

New phone? Sounds like a text intended for his sperm bank mistakenly ending up here. 

[Rico1304]

New phone? Sounds like a text intended for his sperm bank mistakenly ending up here.

 

My sperm is, alas, no more.

[rubble-rouser]

They're like a pig in shit on there at the minute, by my reckoning they've got three threads going to attack him with.

The Labour Party one obviously, Brexit and now the Russian poisoning one.....

 

I did read once that Dan Hodges is a red so maybe he's on there.

 

Hang on, so you're allowed to debate politics on an open forum but only if you don't disagree with the prevailing mood.

 

And the dislike Corbyn?!

[Rico1304]

Hang on, so you're allowed to debate politics on an open forum but only if you don't disagree with the prevailing mood.

 

And the dislike Corbyn?!

I know, imagine being slagged off for not toeing the line!

[rubble-rouser]

Just looked at RAWK - they have a policy of not allowing any story sourced from the Mail and will lock the thread if such a story appears. 

 

We self-censor with the S*n, and that's fine, and I fucking hate the Mail but actually censoring sports storeies on purely political grounds, Jesus Christ! 

[cloggypop]

Yet the Mail is allowed if it is slagging off Jeremy Corbyn.

[Bobby Hundreds]

Rawk is a football site and it even treats football opinions like political dissent in a totalitarian regime, is there any surprise how it treats other subjects. it's a fucking farce of a site it's an embarrassment too LFC in how it police's football talk it's an embarrassment to the idea of a forum on almost every other subject. It isn't even worth mentioning to validate any kind of opinion or point because it's so ridiculous.

 

We have ridiculous opinions and personal attacks on here that sometimes I feel go too far or become way too infantile but it works and it evens out somehow. I think mostly because no one takes this shit too seriously unlike rawk.

[Pureblood]

We have ridiculous opinions and personal attacks on here that sometimes I feel go too far or become way too infantile but it works and it evens out somehow. 

 

 

Over the course of the season.

[Gnasher]

Rawk is an embarrassment to the club and the city and should be closed down. It leaves lfc open to ridicule. It's rules and regulations are toe curling, the sites a bad joke.

[Strontium]

LOL

 

https://twitter.com/RossFootball/status/975746882403217413

[AngryOfTuebrook]

LOL

 

https://twitter.com/RossFootball/status/975746882403217413

Yawn.

[King Emlyn]

Owen Smith sacked

[Strontium]

Owen Smith sacked

Well, he committed the sin of disagreeing with the leader and calling for a second referendum, didn't he.

[Numero Veinticinco]

From what I read, I back Owen Smith's position on this. He wanted a referendum on the final Brexit deal. That's right and fair, in my opinion.

[Strontium]

Sources close to the Labour leader said Smith was not a team player

 

Guffaw.

[moof]

From what I read, I back Owen Smith's position on this. He wanted a referendum on the final Brexit deal. That's right and fair, in my opinion.

Yep, it’s the most sensible position. Still, Owen is not afraid of playing politics with the leadership - should probably stick to the party line if you want to remain front bench.

 

As it is, getting sacked suits him quite nicely. He gets to make a principled stance, and Corbyn cops some stick for ‘purging the moderates’. A great time was had by all.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Good leadership from Corbyn.

 

The party needs to be united and any suggestion of a second referendum, when it's not official party policy, could lead to the less politically savvy members of the electorate voting for another party than Labour.

 

It's sad but true, but there's no real appetite for a second referendum. Just look at the laughable Libs. They're floating several half brained ideas along such lines and they're still doing woefully in the polls.

[Numero Veinticinco]

It's sad but true, but there's no real appetite for a second referendum.

There's a heavy appetite for it.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/26/britons-favour-second-referendum-brexit-icm-poll

[Denny Crane]

I always thought if you sit on the front bench you accept party policy was the age old rule. Or go to the backbenches and are free to express any views you have. He's free to air his views now.

 

Let's not forget he ran a leadership campaign with a similar message and lost decisively.

 

They are still scheming, just in time to fill the weekend papers and wknd shows.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

There's the anger neg...

 

Chortle!

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

There's a heavy appetite for it.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/26/britons-favour-second-referendum-brexit-icm-poll

So, as I said, more people don't want a second referendum/aren't arsed, than those who do want a second referendum.

[Numero Veinticinco]

So, as I said, more people don't want a second referendum/aren't arsed, than those who do want a second referendum.

Yes. Just as you said. 'It's sad but true, but there's no real appetite for a second referendum' = 'Britons favour second referendum by 16-point margin'.

 

Just like you said. Jesus. What a terminal bore. Don't you have the self confidence to just say 'Oh, that's interesting... yes, looks like...'?

[Rico1304]

Yes. Just as you said. 'It's sad but true, but there's no real appetite for a second referendum' = 'Britons favour second referendum by 16-point margin'.Just like you said. Jesus. What a terminal bore. Don't you have the self confidence to just say 'Oh, that's interesting... yes, looks like...'?

Too busy juggling his free accounts. Must have over 15k posts and never paid a penny.