Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should we go back to two up front?


tlw content
 Share

Recommended Posts

I love 442. Shearer and Ferdinand was the best strike duo in the prem era for my money. None of this dropping deep bollocks. Wish people wouldn't overcomplicate shit.

Agreed.

 

It's simplicity and it's creative. 2 full backs that can overlap 2 wingers etc.

It's my favourite in that you can spread play all over the park. I hate to say that the dominance of scum in the 90s was down to this..Milan were pretty good under saachi etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed.

 

It's simplicity and it's creative. 2 full backs that can overlap 2 wingers etc.

It's my favourite in that you can spread play all over the park. I hate to say that the dominance of scum in the 90s was down to this..Milan were pretty good under saachi etc.

rodgers lost his nerve after the 3-3 with palace. We were shite in the next game against newcastle which you could put down to.losing the league but we ve been largely shit since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moving to two upfront won't do shit in my opinion. This squad is naturally unbalanced, the harm has already by our traditional woeful planning in the transfer window. Playing 2 upfront entails leaving Firmino out, while 1 upfront means one of Sturridge/Benteke misses out. So irrespective of the strategy, we will probably have one of our two most expensive summer signings on the bench. Amateurish recruitment again.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moving to two upfront won't do shit in my opinion. This squad is naturally unbalanced, the harm has already by our traditional woeful planning in the transfer window. Playing 2 upfront entails leaving Firmino out, while 1 upfront means one of Sturridge/Benteke misses out. So irrespective of the strategy, we will probably have one of our two most expensive summer signings on the bench. Amateurish recruitment again.

Is right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going to be very interesting if Sturridge stays fit. Our best goalscorer and the big 32m signing....surely both will want to start and also the manager will want them to.

 

What i don't get is if it was his plan to play two up why isn't he doing it already using Ings or Origi so the team get used to the formation.

 

My guess is Stirridge will be asked to play wider in a supposed three..

 

Can't see how you get all his number tens/ am's in playing two up

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What i don't get is if it was his plan to play two up why isn't he doing it already using Ings or Origi so the team get used to the formation.

 

 

Don't be coming on here with your common sense observations...

 

Maybe his plan is to take things slow, grind out 1-0 wins until November and then unleash fury on the league.

 

Or maybe he just hasn't a notion what he's at.

 

Answers on a postcard...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be coming on here with your common sense observations...

 

Maybe his plan is to take things slow, grind out 1-0 wins until November and then unleash fury on the league.

 

Or maybe he just hasn't a notion what he's at.

 

Answers on a postcard...

You are right. Made myself look a bit of a quim!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's become a bit of cliche about whether an attacking midfielder is good at playing right back (because that is where he is more likely to play) but like most cliches there is an element of truth in there.

 

Rodgers signs players with little overall vision about how the player will fit into the structure of his existing squad. Hence we get players being put on the field in bizarre positions, or alternatively we have £20M-£30M players struggling to get a game whilst he is forced into chucking kids in at the deep end.

 

I don't understand how you can be that reckless, for such a period of time and still be allowed to repeat the pattern again and again.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's assembled a generic Lego starter kit of a squad; a large amount of pieces that can seemingly be used to make anything, but in the end it'll look shit in comparison to a specialist set.

 

This analogy is in no way linked to my failed attempts to make a facsimile Star Wars blaster out of my nephew's Lego starter set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's assembled a generic Lego starter kit of a squad; a large amount of pieces that can seemingly be used to make anything, but in the end it'll look shit in comparison to a specialist set.

 

This analogy is in no way linked to my failed attempts to make a facsimile Star Wars blaster out of my nephew's Lego starter set.

Buy him a load of proper Lego Star Wars, you tight sod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...