Transgender stuff - what's going on?

[Rico1304]

5 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I can't understand it for you.

 

You posted something about the Pink News Awards, with specific reference to the Sports Personality of the Year category. You seem upset that the award didn't automatically go to the person who won the most stuff. I pointed out that there's no reason why it should.

Exhibit A.  It’s hilarious, it really is. 
 

An unprecedented success, a young lesbian role model who’s helped bring women’s football to the mainstream.  
 

or 

 

a man
 

 

[Rico1304]

8 minutes ago, lifetime fan said:

Yes or No? 

At first glance she’s lovely.  The hands, adams apple and voice make it a no from me.  

[Skidfingers McGonical]

If it’s a personality award, then Mead should have won it by an mile, because Bridges certainly doesn’t seem to have as much of a personality as Mead. 
 

 

[Rico1304]

Do we have a sports personality of the year thread?  I wonder…?

[lifetime fan]

31 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

At first glance she’s lovely.  The hands, adams apple and voice make it a no from me.  

It’s the beard that normally puts me off. 
 

Imagine that spiky stubble against my sensitive skin. 

[Paulie Dangerously]

2 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I still haven't seen any evidence of sexualised drag shows being presented to children, let alone being normalised (as seems to be the unquestioned  consensus here).

A quick google of "drag queen story hour" shows up pictures of drag Queens in schools, the vast majority wearing what some may consider overly sexualised clothing and styles.

 

"BuT wHo iS tO sAy WhAt iS OvErLy SeXuAl???" I say overly sexualised simply because a teacher would not be permitted to wear such clothing/attire. It would be deemed wholly unprofessional and not normal in an educational environment. Drag queen story hour is not a "drag show" but it is a possible example of the overtly sexual aspects of some of drag culture being brought into school and normalised. 

[skend04]

8 minutes ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

A quick google of "drag queen story hour" shows up pictures of drag Queens in schools, the vast majority wearing what some may consider overly sexualised clothing and styles.

 

"BuT wHo iS tO sAy WhAt iS OvErLy SeXuAl???" I say overly sexualised simply because a teacher would not be permitted to wear such clothing/attire. It would be deemed wholly unprofessional and not normal in an educational environment. Drag queen story hour is not a "drag show" but it is a possible example of the overtly sexual aspects of some of drag culture being brought into school and normalised. 

So what you're saying is that schools are in cahoots with drag artists to 'normalise' over exaggerated depictions of women, or men if the artiste is a woman?

 

Well, if I were you and you know this is going on, I'd be straight on to Ofsted and the authorities.

[Rico1304]

25 minutes ago, skend04 said:

So what you're saying is that schools are in cahoots with drag artists to 'normalise' over exaggerated depictions of women, or men if the artiste is a woman?

 

Well, if I were you and you know this is going on, I'd be straight on to Ofsted and the authorities.

Don’t believe your eyes. The desire to be seen as ‘right’ is so strong. 

[Paulie Dangerously]

1 hour ago, skend04 said:

So what you're saying is that schools are in cahoots with drag artists to 'normalise' over exaggerated depictions of women, or men if the artiste is a woman?

 

Well, if I were you and you know this is going on, I'd be straight on to Ofsted and the authorities.

Yes. That is exactly what I said wasn't it? AoT said he had not seen any examples of overtly sexualised drag shows aimed at children and I - having justified why I would consider some of them overtly sexualised (AoTs parameters) - suggested that drag queen story time;

1 hour ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

  it is a possible example of the overtly sexual aspects of some of drag culture being brought into school and normalised. 

 This knee jerk ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK anyone who tries to discuss the issue is exactly why we can't have a calm discussion about boundaries and sensible compromises. 

 

42 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Don’t believe your eyes. The desire to be seen as ‘right’ is so strong. 

This seems the case in the States. Here less so but it's looming. 

[Rico1304]

4 minutes ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

Yes. That is exactly what I said wasn't it? AoT said he had not seen any examples of overtly sexualised drag shows aimed at children and I - having justified why I would consider some of them overtly sexualised (AoTs parameters) - suggested that drag queen story time;

 This knee jerk ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK anyone who tries to discuss the issue is exactly why we can't have a calm discussion about boundaries and sensible compromises. 

 

This seems the case in the States. Here less so but it's looming. 

This is another post that will be ignored.  
 

IMO the left loves a minority and latches on to them.  Sometimes they are minorities because they aren’t very nice. 
 

Go back in this thread and you will find AOT saying that men can become women and they are as much a woman as your mum.  

[Strontium]

 

[Rico1304]

And I still don’t fucking get why, if you are a man and want to read to kids you need to be dressed as a woman.  What is it adding?  AOT is FUCKING ADAMANT it’s not sexual so why are they dressing as women. And when I say women I don’t mean jeans and T-shirt. Or skirt and top. It’s a fucking ball gown. I’ve been married 11 years and I’ve never seen my wife in a ball gown. (Can’t afford Onlyfans). 
 

The idea you can find pop videos a bit fruity but not a bloke, in the flesh in a fucking dress twerking in front of kids…well. 

[Skidfingers McGonical]

AoT is like Arsene Wenger.
 

Hasn’t seen any of it, or know anyone who thinks the opposite to him, so it doesn’t exist. 
 

And he doesn’t stray into this thread very much. 
 

 

[Rico1304]

Just now, Skidfingers McGonical said:

AoT is like Arsene Wenger.
 

Hasn’t seen any of it, or know anyone who thinks the opposite to him, so it doesn’t exist. 
 

And he doesn’t stray into this thread very much. 
 

 

Biggest fucking hypocrite on here.  Luckily he’ll never see this as he doesn’t read this. Actively avoids it.  

[Babb'sBurstNad]

53 minutes ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

This knee jerk ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK anyone who tries to discuss the issue is exactly why we can't have a calm discussion about boundaries and sensible compromises. 

Agreed.

[Captain Turdseye]

4 minutes ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

Agreed.

Typical. 

[Rico1304]

4 minutes ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

Agreed.

First principles - protect women. 

[Babb'sBurstNad]

6 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

First principles - protect women. 

Oh, so you don't care about kids getting bummed by Widow Twanky then, you fucking monster!

[cloggypop]

Lot of people in here finding drag queens sexy

[Rico1304]

28 minutes ago, cloggypop said:

Lot of people in here finding drag queens sexy

It’s the drag kings that really get me going.  All those women dressing up as men, amazing how many libraries they are performing at without any mither.  
 

You fucking moron. 

[Ne Moe Imya]

1 hour ago, Strontium said:

 

Woah. I wish I hadn't clicked on that thread. That is seriously disturbing. That poor, poor child.

[Rico1304]

On 13/03/2021 at 21:49, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I think any woman should be able to insist on being examined by a woman.  I don't think she should insist on the doctor doing the examination naked.

 

I think changing rooms should have cubicles.

There you go.  

[Rico1304]

On 19/10/2022 at 16:13, Babb'sBurstNad said:

Or maybe provocative drag has a long history in queer culture, and you just didn't know about it.

And the provocation is aimed at children because? 

[Babb'sBurstNad]

18 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

And the provocation is aimed at children because? 

Is aimed, or is being aimed?

[Rico1304]

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

There you go.  

Row back happening soon