Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Arsenal,Chelsea and Leicester Doping Sunday Times


Lee909
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not at all. I wonder how quick people would be to be so confident about this story if Liverpool had of been named instead of arsenal or chelsea or leicester.

 

All there is is some dodgey guy claiming he's treated players from those clubs. Where's the fucking evidence? Oh that's right, its guilty until proved innocent nowadays isnt it?

 

Fair enough.

What makes him dodgy? Had you even heard of him before this story broke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes him dodgy? Had you even heard of him before this story broke?

 

What makes him dodgey? Are you serious?

 

I robbed a bank 2 years ago. The Police dont have a clue and the bank havent noticed anything.

 

Where's his proof?

 

Show us the proof instead of an 'he said this, he said that' and I'll change my mind.

 

Any cunt wearing reflective aviator style sunglasses is dodgey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your interested in roids etc have a watch of bigger,faster,stronger (thinks that's the name) really interesting.

 

Or read Emma O'Reilly's book called 'The Race to Truth' on Armstrong to show how whistleblowers are treated despte telling the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes him dodgey? Are you serious?

 

I robbed a bank 2 years ago. The Police dont have a clue and the bank havent noticed anything.

 

Where's his proof?

 

Show us the proof instead of an 'he said this, he said that' and I'll change my mind.

 

Any cunt wearing reflective aviator style sunglasses is dodgey.

What do you class as proof?

 

And by the way it's spelt dodgy you imbecile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you class as proof?

 

And by the way it's spelt dodgy you imbecile.

 

Seeing as he's the one making claims, it up to him to provide proof to back these claims up.

 

And you do know he isn't registered to be a doctor in the uk, you imbecile?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you prove your claim he's not registered as a Doctor in the UK?

 

Haha. You are a fucking imbecile.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/03/top-footballers-doped-british-doctor-inquiry

 

Bonar told the paper he had not breached General Medical Council rules. But it emerged on Saturday that he does not hold a licence to practise medicine in the UK, leading the GMC to suggest his London practice may be breaching the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes him dodgey? Are you serious?

 

I robbed a bank 2 years ago. The Police dont have a clue and the bank havent noticed anything.

 

Where's his proof?

 

Show us the proof instead of an 'he said this, he said that' and I'll change my mind.

 

Any cunt wearing reflective aviator style sunglasses is dodgey.

So it's sunglasses that make him dodgy. Right, ok then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, you've quoted a guardian article

 

Nope imbecile. Its a quote from the GMC.

 

"

Niall Dickson, the chief executive of the GMC, said: “These are serious allegations and we will follow them up as a matter of urgency. We expect all doctors to follow our guidance – if they fail to do so they are putting their right to practise in jeopardy.

 

“Dr Bonar does not currently hold a licence and is therefore unable to practise medicine in the UK. Any doctor without a licence who continues to carry out the privileged duties of a doctor is committing a serious breach of our guidance, and potentially a criminal offence.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope imbecile. Its a quote from the GMC.

 

"

Niall Dickson, the chief executive of the GMC, said: “These are serious allegations and we will follow them up as a matter of urgency. We expect all doctors to follow our guidance – if they fail to do so they are putting their right to practise in jeopardy.

 

“Dr Bonar does not currently hold a licence and is therefore unable to practise medicine in the UK. Any doctor without a licence who continues to carry out the privileged duties of a doctor is committing a serious breach of our guidance, and potentially a criminal offence.”

Sorry to be a pedant but it's a quote from a newspaper, quoting someone that for all I know could be a made up person.

 

I asked you to prove he wasn't registered. I surmise that there is a actual registered list of names of doctors in the U.K. Show me the list and his name not appearing on there and that I will accept as proof..... Not some quote from a name from a newspaper.

 

You are ridiculing the doctors claims as no proof and then claiming the quotes are true with no proof to back them up.

 

Hypocritical imbecile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pedant but it's a quote from a newspaper, quoting someone that for all I know could be a made up person.

 

I asked you to prove he wasn't registered. I surmise that there is a actual registered list of names of doctors in the U.K. Show me the list and his name not appearing on there and that I will accept as proof..... Not some quote from a name from a newspaper.

 

You are ridiculing the doctors claims as no proof and then claiming the quotes are true with no proof to back them up.

 

Hypocritical imbecile.

Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pedant but it's a quote from a newspaper, quoting someone that for all I know could be a made up person.

 

I asked you to prove he wasn't registered. I surmise that there is a actual registered list of names of doctors in the U.K. Show me the list and his name not appearing on there and that I will accept as proof..... Not some quote from a name from a newspaper.

 

You are ridiculing the doctors claims as no proof and then claiming the quotes are true with no proof to back them up.

 

Hypocritical imbecile.

 

Managed to make yourself look an imbecile, a cunt and  a pedant all at the same time. Well done!

 

Oh, and it is '"doctor's"

 

Now fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...