Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Tennis


Remmie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Both parties strike me as a little childish here. Couldn't she get a Doctor's note that waivs her from going to press conferences or something? Surely, if you prove it's effecting your mental health, you could get out of them, or atleast tell press people before hand so they don't ask specific questions. 

 

And then threatening to kick her out of the tournament is just messed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

Both parties strike me as a little childish here. Couldn't she get a Doctor's note that waivs her from going to press conferences or something? Surely, if you prove it's effecting your mental health, you could get out of them, or atleast tell press people before hand so they don't ask specific questions. 

 

And then kicking her out of the tournament is just messed up.

She quit, no? 

 

Which is a real shame, because her record of 7 match wins in 5 tournaments at Roland Garros suggests that she was going to storm to victory... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Josef Svejk said:

She quit, no? 

 

Which is a real shame, because her record of 7 match wins in 5 tournaments at Roland Garros suggests that she was going to storm to victory... 

Right, yeah, she withdrew, but it seems like she was effectively bullied out of the tournament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Josef Svejk said:

Curiously her mental health issues never arise during the hard court season. 

 

Strange that. 

So, you're saying that someone with mental health problems has good days and bad days?

 

Not a groundbreaking discovery, to be honest. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DJLJ said:

https://www.skysports.com/share/12322394
 

According to this, Kvitova has had to withdraw due to an ankle injury sustained during press requirements. They will now be getting under even more scrutiny …

Setting a bad precedent, this. Any tennis player who doesn’t want to meet the press could feasibly just claim ankle injuries to avoid it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Not utter bollocks at all. Every tennis player could feasibly use mental health issues to duck out of future interviews. Possibly same for other sports.

So other people with mental health problems could be treated decently? What a fucking nightmare that would be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

So, you're saying that someone with mental health problems has good days and bad days?

 

Not a groundbreaking discovery, to be honest. 

Good days (happy to fulfil her contractual obligations) when she wins, bad days (can't be arsed fulfilling her contractual obligations) when she loses. All the while earning $40m+ per annum. 

 

It's a genuine tragedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hasn't she said that she has struggled since she won the US Open in 2018? I've seen nothing suggesting its something she can turn on and off depending on the surface she is playing on although someone with a fragile mind and confidence issues might well find it more difficult when she traditionally doesn't do well ...... 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently money in and of itself is an evidence-based treatment for mental health ailments. The only reason that’s not more widely known is the elites want to suppress the fact to keep it all to themselves, not because it’s retrograde, small-minded claptrap of the type which routinely features in the columns below online tabloid articles.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Josef Svejk said:

Good days (happy to fulfil her contractual obligations) when she wins, bad days (can't be arsed fulfilling her contractual obligations) when she loses. All the while earning $40m+ per annum. 

 

It's a genuine tragedy.

Mental health problems being triggered by setbacks at work.  This really isn't hard to understand. 

 

You're taking the Homer stance here "Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

hasn't she said that she has struggled since she won the US Open in 2018? I've seen nothing suggesting its something she can turn on and off depending on the surface she is playing on although someone with a fragile mind and confidence issues might well find it more difficult when she traditionally doesn't do well ...... 

Absolutely. 

I'm sure the overpriced watch manufacturers or whoever it is who pay to get their logos in shot will be just fine if they decide to cut players a little bit of slack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Mental health problems being triggered by setbacks at work.  This really isn't hard to understand. 

 

You're taking the Homer stance here "Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand."

 

Is there a way that her mental health problems can be diagnosed by an expert? Were they diagnosed by an expert and then rejected by the tournament as an excuse? Without it, we can go round in circles, people will either take for granted that self-diagnosed issues must exist because she says so or reject them out of hand, depending on where they normally stand on this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Column in a national newspaper claiming - on the grounds of... something... presumably - that she's lying about her mental health problems. 

I mean, I read the article - if you can call it that - but to call it bullying is just a lie. I really don’t get this ‘widen the definition of terms so it means whatever you want’ approach so many take these days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Absolutely. 

I'm sure the overpriced watch manufacturers or whoever it is who pay to get their logos in shot will be just fine if they decide to cut players a little bit of slack.

You think? I'm not sure you're in tune with the cutthroat world of advertising, they'll pay and do almost anything to get their products in shot, after all its pretty much their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Mental health problems being triggered by setbacks at work.  This really isn't hard to understand. 

 

You're taking the Homer stance here "Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand."

 

Ok: maybe we should clarify matters here. 

 

For me, a bad day at work is not a 'mental health issue'.

 

I deal with affluent young ladies in a professional capacity every day of the week. Any inconvenience (or requirement that they make the minimum of effort) is now described by individuals of their social class and generation as a 'mental health issue'. 

 

I don't deny the existence of 'mental illness'. I resent the increasingly prevalent abuse of the term in the First World.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr Nowt said:

Top companies will be queueing up to risk being associated with stigmatising mental health issues in this day and age. Free publicity for them. Job’s a good ‘un.

It's not simply a question of either/or though is it? My superdedupa educated bafoon.

 

You think corporate cunts like Nike put a logo hat on Tiger Woods in the interview after he crashed his car because they were concerned with his mental health?

 

Corporations pay to have their products shown in movies, sporting events etc because they want them seen by as many people as possible, that certainly extends to press conferences. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...