Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Tory Cabinet Thread


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello,
Welcome to today’s Sensemaker. (Tortoise)

Tuesday 29 June 2021
Chris Cook

 

Secret emails. The UK government is under pressure at the moment over one of its normal practices: officials and ministers routinely use private communications channels – private email, WhatsApp messages – to do government work. Matt Hancock, the departed health secretary, and Lord Bethell, a still-serving junior minister, both used unofficial email accounts for work. A third health minister, Helen Whately, has now been caught too. Labour is calling for an investigation. 

This was, you might recall, a major issue back in 2016 for Hillary Clinton: the use of a private set of accounts from during her time as secretary of state dogged her presidential campaign. It is a problem for modern government. And it is banal, but extremely important:

  • Keeping public information off public systems means that important data may be missed when Freedom of Information requests are made – or when courts require disclosures. 
  • What if private health information were disclosed to an official and they then leave their job? And are these private accounts secure from Russian hackers, say?
  • Allowing communications on official business in a way that allows the corrupt or incompetent to hide and destroy traces of discussions is a bad idea. 
  • We are supposed to keep good records of decisions for the benefit of historians, but also so that people can understand the rationale and purpose of policy decisions. 

(I should declare an interest: the guidance in force now is all a result of reporting I did at the FT (£) a decade ago on this behaviour at the Department for Education: Michael Gove, then the secretary of state, was using his wife’s email for government business, then denying the emails existed.)

As a general rule, the bits of government that are bad on transparency are weak on things like private email use. And the bits of government that are bad on transparency are bad at everything. The Cabinet Office, the most rotten, dysfunctional and dishonest pillar of the British state, is also its most secretive – and a part of government where private systems are prevalent.

The law, in truth, is clever: it cares about whether information ought to be public, and does not care about the medium. If the PM uses an official email address to arrange dinner with his wife, that is not accessible under the Freedom of Information Act. If he uses WhatsApp to talk about procurement, then it is. Likewise: courts do not care about the letterhead on the email. 

The core problem we have is that if public officials use private accounts, we have to trust them to disclose from those accounts in response to search requests. And if they are the prime minister, say, officials might think getting them to hand over their phone, or engage with an FOIA request themselves, is a bit much. So things will go unseen and unfound. Given the cronyism questions that beset this government, this is serious.

But there’s a simpler issue too. The rules say they shouldn’t do it. Under the law (section 46 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 for example), they are required to keep proper records. That should be enough.

Adieu. This will be my last Sensemaker: many thanks to many readers who got in touch over the past few years with their kind thoughts and corrections. I’m a co-author on a piece coming out this Thursday in our file and, tonight, I am chairing a ThinkIn on saving the high street. Please, join me.

 

Reckon Gove’s missus would love a look at his official one. She’ll have to change her Twitter name though. The hag. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About three or four, maybe more, people have a video of the TV being rewound, him getting briefed, fixing the angles, practicing the shriek, telling him what a ‘goal’ is, repeatedly and then for extra measure making sure they were breaking covid protocol just to really stick it to the proles.

 

They have this, but not an ounce of integrity in going along with this pathetic charade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

About three or four, maybe more, people have a video of the TV being rewound, him getting briefed, fixing the angles, practicing the shriek, telling him what a ‘goal’ is, repeatedly and then for extra measure making sure they were breaking covid protocol just to really stick it to the proles.

 

They have this, but not an ounce of integrity in going along with this pathetic charade.

And it was still fucking shit, too. Not that the 'he got Brexit done, mate' brigade will give a fuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sugar Ape said:

Whenever I see that gif of him clapping it convinces me David Icke was correct about lizard people existing. 
 

 

18CB6B9D-B95E-46C6-948A-217358F96DE0.gif

That's how you'd clap if you were at your kid's school play but had got there late because you'd had a skinfull after work and the Mrs was fuming with you.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Section_31 said:

That's how you'd clap if you were at your kid's school play but had got there late because you'd had a skinfull after work and the Mrs was fuming with you.

You’d told her that you finished work at 5pm and only had one pint when you’d been in the pub since lunchtime. 
 

And you’d still make a better go of it than Gove. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...