Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Panama Papers


cloggypop
 Share

Recommended Posts

None of this is news is it? I'm not shocked by any of these details. Common knowledge that the richest have the ability, and generally use that ability, to minimise their tax liability through legal means. I don't think any notable UK individuals have been accused of doing anything illegal?

This is the problem. The terms 'legal' and 'immoral' are miles apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco

Wouldn't suprise me if Corbyn the commie got things to hide. The trotsky terrorist probably got a couple of quid stashed in a post office account.

The profits from his hemp business alone must run in to literally hundreds of pounds a year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of this is news is it? I'm not shocked by any of these details. Common knowledge that the richest have the ability, and generally use that ability, to minimise their tax liability through legal means. I don't think any notable UK individuals have been accused of doing anything illegal?

Nah you're right, tax dodging is not news. Can't wait for it to be brushed under the carpet and never spoken about again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda depends. How many of them are trhere?

 

I can't imagine Wikileaks and alike would withhold data like that.

 

It's an interesting dynamic with Wikileaks in control of drip feeding stuff to the press and then the press being in control of drip feeding stuff to the public.

 

Do Wikileaks have stuff on/from the three larger law firms of this variety? If so have they gone with this one first because it has more stuff on Western "baddies" and therefore they want any mainstream media cuntery out of the way first? Who knows?

 

The first BBC story on this essentially had the full fucking list of everyone on the CIA naughty step - Assad, Gaddafi, Putin, China, North Korea, basically anyone that isn't Team America. Maybe Wikileaks are playing a bit of a blinder here, maybe not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way the Icelandic people bounced onto the streets and caused some shit. British people are too polite and bovine to do anything about this. So indoctrinated and worn down by the system that we just bend over and take it. It would take something a lot bigger than this for the people to rise up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...