Report: Liverpool keen to follow up interest in Matheus Nunes

[Bobby Hundreds]

Haven't wolves fans been saying he's not physical enough. I'll admit I read someone else saying "haven't Wolves fans been saying he's not physical enough"

[lifetime fan]

4 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

 

As it stands we haven't committed anything.

 

The difference between signing him and loaning him, and activating a clause for a minimal increase a year later means that if he did nothing this season we could just not pursue the transfer at all instead of having to make the transfer work because we'd already bought him and loaned him hoping he'd adapt.

 

It's less risky because you commit absolutely nothing up front and aren't obligated to move for him, any pre-agreed price also gives you the security that if he absolutely tore it up in the first season you aren't paying 20/30/40 million more to try and secure him.

 

 

 

That might have made sense if we had actually brought in a midfielder in the summer as well as agreeing this deal. 

[aws]

His physicality is said to be open to question. 

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, aws said:

His physicality is said to be open to question. 

Still better than Keita whose bones and muscles are open to question. Not to mention his mind and mirrors.

[Carvalho Diablo]

OR can fuck off.

 

Bellingham OR Nunes OR Fernandez OR Barella...

 

We need 4 really mobile, quick, aggressive and skillful midfielders imo, to replace the flaccid members we currently have.

[El Rojo]

Would we have had to pay money to Wolves to get that optional £44m clause?

[J-V]

47 minutes ago, El Rojo said:

Would we have had to pay money to Wolves to get that optional £44m clause?

Maybe he’d only go to Wolves if that was the clause.

 

Mind you it’s all probably bollocks.