Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Gerrard to return?


Nelly-Szoboszlai
 Share

Recommended Posts

People harp on too much about him not winning a Premiership winners medal but he won everything else. It was shit perpetuated by the media round about when Mourinho was trying to nab him for Chelsea, the idea that if you played for Liverpool you were somehow wasting your talent.

 

He won everything under the sun here including a cl - the absolute pinnacle of club football which very few English players of his generation got a sniff of.

 

Plus he was a hero here, a legend rather than a footsoldier whose only value was in a good performance, and both Owen and Torres can testify to being on the wrong end of that decision.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
Guest Pistonbroke

He'd be a massive boost for the players. Not on about in a playing role but what he would bring to the changing room. We have a young squad and they could benefit massively from extra knowledge and motivation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gerrard needed to go because Rodgers was determined to shoe-horn him in as a lynchpin in the middle of the park, regardless of his immobility, and in that position he was a liability to the side. But if he did come back in a playing role, you'd trust Klopp to know how and when to use him - like the twilight years of Scholes at United.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he left because he could no longer be guaranteed a regular start.

That's what I had read as well but his point about where Rodgers played him is spot on.

 

Maybe having been in L.A. for 18 months and watching LFC from afar he's come to accept that though. Also I can't help but think Klopp would have a much better control over the situation than Rodgers. I don't really walk to talk about the latter much but I never got the sense that he was comfortable around the bigger personas in the dressing room. Klopp on the other hand seems to be able to navigate things like that with the best of them. I have no doubt that Gerrard would be only be coming back in a capacity that both sides, and Klopp especially, were okay with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/oct/22/steven-gerrard-instagram-la-galaxy-mls

 

So whats the deal with this?

 

And Klopps comments. Does anyone know what role Stevie is likely to be taking? Playing? Coaching? Ambassador?

None of the above in this moment. Great as he was in the no. 8 shirt Liverpool FC is not in need of him, in this moment, and sentiment needs to be put aside here until he proves he can offer something useful in this moment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...