Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Transgender stuff - what's going on?


Gym Beglin
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Elite said:

Why you so obsessed with this stuff @Rico1304. It's bizarre.


Medical scandal, safeguarding, women being raped, kids being sterilised, bringing down governments, sports being compromised, rampant misogyny, terrible laws.  No idea really.  
 

I quoted an article over the page describing the medical scandal and we know from a 4 yr report how kids have been effectively experimented on. How you think it’s a non-issue is bizarre. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:


Medical scandal, safeguarding, women being raped, kids being sterilised, bringing down governments, sports being compromised, rampant misogyny, terrible laws.  No idea really.  
 

I quoted an article over the page describing the medical scandal and we know from a 4 yr report how kids have been effectively experimented on. How you think it’s a non-issue is bizarre. 

And bumping this thread solves what exactly?

 

You may be right but you are preaching to the wrong congregation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Elite said:

And bumping this thread solves what exactly?

 

You may be right but you are preaching to the wrong congregation.


Oh I guess that proving I’ve been right for all those years gives a sense of satisfaction.  
 

Weird that this ‘congregation’ isn’t bothered by any of stuff I mentioned.  
 

One thing that I think it’s highlighted is how the desire to seen to be kind to a minority means all rational thought can go out the window.  There’s been blokes here arguing that rapists should be allowed in women’s prisons, that men aren’t better than women at sports, that bearded men are lesbians- I mean it’s like being in the upside down. 
 

Theres even been legislation proposed that would make telling the truth a crime.  
 

But why would anyone be bothered by that? 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Elite said:

Keep talking to yourself on this thread then. Good lad.


I post, people can choose to read or not. Pretty much like any thread. 
 

You think Im weird for caring about this, yet you also think we live in a simulation.  
 

Keep the book recommendations going though.  

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:


I post, people can choose to read or not. Pretty much like any thread. 
 

You think Im weird for caring about this, yet you also think we live in a simulation.  
 

Keep the book recommendations going though.  

Touchy fucker you and thanks, you too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Elite said:

Touchy fucker you and thanks, you too!

Not really. 
 

Women like JKR, Sal Grover, Riley Gaines, Julie Bindel, Jo Phoenix, Alison Bailey, Posie Parker, Germaine Greer and numerous others have had to fight against being cancelled, fired and being made in pariahs. 
 

They’ve been proved right. 
 

I think the peak was being told that Alex Drummond was a lesbian.  Such a good lesbian he was employed to go into schools to tell young girls all about it. 
 

What would you say to Alex when he told you he was a lesbian? 
 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/this-transgender-woman-has-a-full-beard-and-she-couldnt-be-h

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheHowieLama said:

another similarity with gnash

 

Massively overstating a case?

 

Rico- I'm kind of broadly in agreement with a lot of what you post on this thread,  but you go way too far.

 

The Hoylyood no confidence vote is for Yousaf, not the government- it needn't collapse it. The Cass report isn't the main or only reason Yousaf dissolved the coalition. He's an awful politician who's a massive downgrade on Sturgeon and has massively fucked up because he doesn't command the control she did over a fractious party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mudface said:

 

Massively overstating a case?

 

Rico- I'm kind of broadly in agreement with a lot of what you post on this thread,  but you go way too far.

 

The Hoylyood no confidence vote is for Yousaf, not the government- it needn't collapse it. The Cass report isn't the main or only reason Yousaf dissolved the coalition. He's an awful politician who's a massive downgrade on Sturgeon and has massively fucked up because he doesn't command the control she did over a fractious party.

 ‘Too far’ - how so? By highlighting the nonsense and hypocrisy?

 

I guess yours is one view on Scotland.  There are others. Isla Bryson peaked a country.  
 

https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/humza-yousaf-should-have-listened-to-women-like-ash-regan-about-gender-self-id-now-he-may-have-to-susan-dalgety-4606388

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mudface said:

 

Massively overstating a case?

 

Rico- I'm kind of broadly in agreement with a lot of what you post on this thread,  but you go way too far.

 

The Hoylyood no confidence vote is for Yousaf, not the government- it needn't collapse it. The Cass report isn't the main or only reason Yousaf dissolved the coalition. He's an awful politician who's a massive downgrade on Sturgeon and has massively fucked up because he doesn't command the control she did over a fractious party.

 ‘Too far’ - how so? By highlighting the nonsense and hypocrisy?

 

I guess yours is one view on Scotland.  There are others. Isla Bryson peaked a country.  
 

https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/humza-yousaf-should-have-listened-to-women-like-ash-regan-about-gender-self-id-now-he-may-have-to-susan-dalgety-4606388

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fucks sake Rico your obsession with the rights and safety of half of the population of planet earth as well as safeguarding children is fucking boring.

 

We need more emphasis, posts and threads about the tories, right wingers, Palestine and the inner workings of the Labour party.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of performative outrage only ever applies to a very narrow band or subject and the fervor with which the right in particular (although not exclusively) will go after a certain sub-set of people under the guise of 'safety and concern' isn't mirrored by their lack of equivalent outrage for the much larger threats out their.

 

Unless I've missed the 'Rapey white males - What's going on' or the 'prevelance of middle aged white pedophiles - whats going on' thread's where people are espousing their obsessive 'I'm just looking out for women and children' claims with endless ranty posts.

 

It'd make Miriam Cates proud (maybe that's the intent).

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, A Red said:

Fucks sake Rico your obsession with the rights and safety of half of the population of planet earth as well as safeguarding children is fucking boring.

 

We need more emphasis, posts and threads about the tories, right wingers, Palestine and the inner workings of the Labour party.

 

 

Ha. 
 

It’s the ultimate virtue signal.  “I’m that desperate to show how right on I am that I’m willing to deny the evidence of my eyes.”

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

This kind of performative outrage only ever applies to a very narrow band or subject and the fervor with which the right in particular (although not exclusively) will go after a certain sub-set of people under the guise of 'safety and concern' isn't mirrored by their lack of equivalent outrage for the much larger threats out their.

 

Unless I've missed the 'Rapey white males - What's going on' or the 'prevelance of middle aged white pedophiles - whats going on' thread's where people are espousing their obsessive 'I'm just looking out for women and children' claims with endless ranty posts.

 

It'd make Miriam Cates proud (maybe that's the intent).

 

 

 

 Lazy thinking again.  The idea that the women at the forefront of pushing back against this bollocks are right wing is crazy. Joanne Cherry, Julie Bindel even JKR are socialists who have been abandoned by the left.  The fact that people on the right haven’t been captured and are able to say ‘that’s a bloke’ says more about the left.  Last week a report showed the scandal for what it is.  If those women hadn’t made such a fuss that report would never had happened and kids would still be at risk.  
 

On your point about men being dangerous no one is arguing against it. In fact that’s one of the central pillars of the argument. Women are in danger from men so the idea that a self selecting subset of men should be allowed access to women when they are vulnerable is fucking mad.  
 

imagine the Horizon scandal campaigners or the Hillsborough campaigners being told they were going too far…

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot - if you think the GC women are right wing have a look on YouTube for any of the events that have been attacked by masked men.  Violent men turning up to events where women relate stories of being raped.  

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

That's what not exclusively means.

 

It very much does apply to the little TLW tory cohort though.

From today’s Guardian

 

“The tide ……is visibly turning against a particular strain of trans activism, leaving tough lessons to be learned about the kind of scolding tone and morally absolute refusal to engage with reasonable opposition that can be fatal to progressive causes.”

 

Also the idea that you can dismiss an argument because the person making it isn’t a fan of Labour is pathetic.  

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, A Red said:

Fucks sake Rico your obsession with the rights and safety of half of the population of planet earth as well as safeguarding children is fucking boring.

 

We need more emphasis, posts and threads about the tories, right wingers, Palestine and the inner workings of the Labour party.

 

 

 

I'm broadly in agreement with him on the subject, I just found it funny how he kept posting stuff with no reply.

 

Problem with a lot of this stuff when you take it from twitter or some other online sources, as I've pointed out with Gnasher, is that it's all someone's take on an issue, or a report, or whatever.

 

This cass report, there'll be people posting excerpts which prove their point, and others posting other bits that seem to refute it.

 

With Gnasher and that Origi lad, it's just endless tweets with "genocide!' written above it.

 

You could do the same with this, "chicks with dicks!".

 

For all the bad press the hated "msm", at least aspects of it try and present balanced views of most issues, whereas online talking heads drip drip you everything through their own prism.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

Who mentioned Labour?

 

I'm dismissing your performative outrage which is very tory (or very remorseful drunken night out, which basically amounts to the same thing).

 

 


Dont you find it somewhat amusing that everything I’ve said would happen, has happened?  I guess that’s what annoys you the most.  

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the one that seems to be annoyed though, it's the classic lunatic shouting that everyone else is mad at 2pm in a wetherspoons trope.

 

It seems to consume your every waking moment, never go full Le Tiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

I'm not the one that seems to be annoyed though, it's the classic lunatic shouting that everyone else is mad at 2pm in a wetherspoons trope.

 

It seems to consume your every waking moment, never go full Le Tiss.


Weird.  There’s a report not 2 weeks old detailing what could be the biggest medical scandal for decades but you’re comparing me to a conspiracy theorist.  
 

Maybe if I was posting about a regional war thousands of miles away it’d be ok.  

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...