Daniel Sturridge-2015

[Russ Atmosphere]

I'd sell Ings as well.

 

Big injury, chances are he'll be stop/start for the next 18 months with subsequent niggles.

Two major knee injuries now is it? Reckon we'd be more mad not to consider selling if Klopp has one of his own players in mind.

[Frankenhooker]

He wont take less than his current £150k a week, £7.8m a year, and he has three and a half years left, or around £27.3m, on his contract.

 

Why would City and Chelsea, the very clubs that binned him because of his attitude, not talent, rehire him?

 

We have a very expensive cones and bibs man on our hands for some while yet.

He didn't leave City because of his attitude, you've said this a couple of times. City bent over backwards to try and keep him.

[VladimirIlyich]

Two major knee injuries now is it? Reckon we'd be more mad not to consider selling if Klopp has one of his own players in mind.

I think one or two of us hinted at Ings poor recent injury record when Rodgers once again splurged on another English player.

Having said this,I would risk holding on to Ings as I think he deserves a chance or two and may get on well with Klopp due to a good hardworking attitude,which seems at a premium at our club lately.

[Jairzinho]

Be very surprised if he got rid of Ings. Seems like the perfect squad player, especially for Klopp. Getting rid of Benteke and Sturridge is the priority.

[kemskem]

I'd sell Ings as well.

Big injury, chances are he'll be stop/start for the next 18 months with subsequent niggles.

He's got a full preseason to have if you're talking about problems getting back to fitness. Ruud van Nistlrooy is the shining example for cruciate recoverees so you can never say how he's going to turn out.

[TalkSilly]

Must be true if it's in the Sunday Mirror.

 

Yeah, at the very most someone at the club has told the journo that Klopp's getting to the end of his tether with Sturridge and that's lead to a conversation about how much he might fetch if he were sold. For me the very idea that anyone would pay a fee for a player that's played a handful of games in the last 18 months is absurd. And, even if Sturridge did manage to get through a medical, how would any club prepared to take him know that he wouldn't just cry off with some pain somewhere the minute it looked like he might have to play in an actual match.

 

I think the most likely outcome is that we get a small loan fee for him from somewhere, probably abroad, where Liverpool also pay his wages every week he doesn't play. Like Joe Cole, that will be the arrangement until his contract with us runs out. He will probably also mysteriously start being available for more and more games the closer that contract gets to ending.

[magicrat]

No one is going to pay 25 million quid for a footballer that doesn't play football

Not up front anyway . You might get a deal where we get paid in installments on a pay as he plays basis but unless you can cleanly offload him there is no point . That just won't happen.

[TalkSilly]

I'd sell Ings as well.

 

Big injury, chances are he'll be stop/start for the next 18 months with subsequent niggles.

 

It's a crying shame he got injured. I'm sure we'd have a fair few more points if he's stayed fit.

 

When he had the repair op on the torn ACL in October I remember the news was positive that he had a chance of playing again this season as there was no ancillary damage but he did an interview last month saying that he had been advised that he should wait until next season.

[jimmycase]

I think one or two of us hinted at Ings poor recent injury record when Rodgers once again splurged on another English player.

Having said this,I would risk holding on to Ings as I think he deserves a chance or two and may get on well with Klopp due to a good hardworking attitude,which seems at a premium at our club lately.

 

His fee hasnt been decided by a tribunal yet last I heard so there was no splurging of anything by anyone.

[Bjornebye]

Inge looked brilliant for us before he got injured. Any talk of wanting to sell him is ridiculous. As for Sturbridge, we need to keep him from playing for the rest of the season. Write it off and let him mend properly. On his day (when fit) he is one of the best strikers around. He needs to be properly managed back to fitness. 

[xerxes]

He didn't leave City because of his attitude, you've said this a couple of times. City bent over backwards to try and keep him.

His contract expired. "Bent over backwards?"

[Phoenix]

His contract expired. "Bent over backwards?"

He wouldn't sign a new one as Chelsea offered him a ridiculous amount for a teenager.

[Frankenhooker]

His contract expired. "Bent over backwards?"

They offered him £45k per week after three league games, he refused to sign a contract. They were desperate for him to stay.

[VladimirIlyich]

His fee hasnt been decided by a tribunal yet last I heard so there was no splurging of anything by anyone.

Pardon me,for presuming will will not pay way over a players value. I mean,we never do this kind of thing at all,do we?

[ZonkoVille77]

He likely thinks he's made it and doesn't need to try anymore. He's enough money to retire and make all his own dresses. A waster. Sell him and let him be someone else's problem.

[an tha]

Bound to get himself fit just in time to go and play for Ingerlund in that shite in the summer then get injured again pre season.

 

He is a boss striker but useless to us.

 

Sell - if we can find somebody to take him.

[Strontium]

Much like Western civilisation, a fit Daniel Sturridge could be said to be a good idea.

[jimmycase]

Pardon me,for presuming will will not pay way over a players value. I mean,we never do this kind of thing at all,do we?

 

Your implied apology is accepted. I really dont know what sad point you're trying to make by widening your comments to now included every other overpriced fucker we've bought.

 

We cant overpay for ings because a tribunal will decide his price. Ergo, we wont or havent 'splurged' anything on him.

[LFC 6 Times]

It's an unbelievably frustrating experience to have the idea of Sturridge in the background. I can understand the decision to try get rid of him it's bad for the squad and the morale of the fans to pin their hopes on one of the most injury prone footballers of all time.

[Curly]

People who turn up to work 1 out of every 8 weeks, if that, but constantly go on social media to tell everyone what they are up to, rubbing their excessive wages and lifestyle in the people's faces who pay for them.

 

Oh, sorry. Wrong thread. I thought this was instant cunt identifiers.

[Paco]

keep him there like harry kewell. he turned out to be quite lucky for us.

[Gym Beglin]

I bet Villa would offer £16m.

[Lee909]

I bet the wouldn't. They'll be in the championship and the owner is busy not spending

[TheHowieLama]

Much like Western civilisation, a fit Daniel Sturridge could be said to be a good idea.

 

He would make a brilliant Communist. Wouldn't he? WOULDN'T HE!!!

[VladimirIlyich]

His fee hasnt been decided by a tribunal yet last I heard so there was no splurging of anything by anyone.

So you already know or are happy with what we will pay?

Or will we get him for free?