Quantcast
Featured: "Hunt loses his rag (1968-69)" by Frank Dacey - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
tlw content

Featured: "Hunt loses his rag (1968-69)" by Frank Dacey

Recommended Posts

Not really a ‘Magic Moment’ this one, but it was certainly a memorable one. Drawing Leicester in the FA Cup in the 60s left Liverpool fans feeling like a vampire looking at a bottle of holy water; nervously worried about an upset.

 

So when the 5th round draw sent us to Filbert Street memories of the 1963 semi-final it was regarded as a difficult assignment. However, when the initial game was drawn, optimism abounded that the Reds would win through. After all, we’d thumped Leicester 4-0 at home earlier in the season. What could possibly go wrong?

 

In front of a 55,000 crowd the Reds failed to repeat the rocket-like start of the league game, when they’d been 4-0 up in 12 minutes. Indeed, it was Leicester who took the lead in the 34th minute through Andy Lochhead, a big bruiser of a centre-forward. Just 6 minutes later, Liverpool were awarded a penalty kick in front of the Kop. Up stepped Tommy Smith and away dived Peter Shilton to pull off a great save.

 

Bill Shankly used to watch games from the director’s box so, when a game was going wrong, people had one eye on the pitch and one eye on the player’s tunnel to see if Shanks would come down to order a change be made. With 20 minutes to go, Shankly appeared by the dugout and Bobby Graham was prepared to come on. With no electronic boards then, substitutions were made by some magic process of hand signals, and to Anfield’s astonishment it became clear that Roger Hunt was going to come off.

 

Hunt was leading scorer, a club legend and had never been subbed before. He was clearly furious and threw his shirt down on the pitch before storming off to the dressing room. A stunned crowd watched the game die out into a tame defeat but all talk afterwards was about ‘Sir Roger’. Opinion was mixed. Many thought that Hunt was a club legend who deserved to be treated with more respect but there were those who thought that the manager’s decision had to be respected and that Hunt had set a terrible example.

 

Shankly and Hunt quickly patched up their differences but it was clear that his time at Anfield was limited and that the great 60s team was on the verge of break up.

 

 

Team: Lawrence, Lawler, Strong, Smith, Yeats, Hughes, Callagahan, Hunt (Graham), Evans, St John, Thompson:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Season:1968/69
Opposition:Leicester City

Result:0-1
Scorers
Venue: Anfield

 

 

Click here to view the article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't remember, but there was a big sense of shock that Hunt had been so blatant in his anger. It was like a king having a strop with a god. It was the first time I remember anyone challenging authority in football. The thought of anyone standing up to Shankly or even to Harry Catterick just hadn't occurred to most fans.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to be fair Sir Roger had a very poor game and had looked out of sorts for a while. what was surprising was his reaction, not the substitution. Shanks played him in midfield for a few games after this, with the Saint and went with a mobile young three of Graham, Evans and Peter Thompson which tore a few teams apart before almost all the forwards got knee problems. They were frustrating times and a lotof us on the kop could see it wastime to change the side as Leeds and the blues were starting to overtake us.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always thought we sold Sir Roger a year or two early but no sympathy or loyalty to players in those days. They belonged to the club and that was that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What made the substitution a little more embarrassing for Roger was that we were attacking the Anfield Road and the game had stopped fro a corner or free kick for us and everyone had gone into the Leicester penalty area. The signals from the bench weren't getting through to the players so the referee went to the sideline, spoke to Shankly or Paisley and then ran back to the players finger pointing at Roger Hunt.

 

Hunt just stood there for a couple of seconds, quite as dumbfounded as us fans, before marching off, obviously very upset. As he got to the dugout he just pulled off his shirt and threw it to the ground, not at any of the management team. It was pretty saddening in every sense; Bill Shankly making what was generally thought to be a bad substitution - Hunt, even in poor form, was still our most likely source of a goal - Sir Roger's reaction was an act of petulance from somebody who we thought was above such nonsense, and we got knocked out of the FA Cup.

 

Hunt later apologised. Shankly, although never going as far as to admit as much, probably knew that it was a badly handled incident. But Bill was the boss and his decision had to be respected no matter how much it aggrieved a player. For me, Hunt's reaction was wrong but the circumstances that provoked it made his anger understandable. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was only ten in the stands with my dad and this has conjured up a distant memory, I can see him now going to the tunnel taking his shirt off but obviously can't comment on the game. Was true sir roger was never booked ? , as I recall me dad saying that bobby Charlton told him that your ankles would be black and blue after playing against him , funny how things bring a mental image back. Anyhow pity Torah boy couldn't recall some questions in the pub quiz a few years ago as well as that incident, how are you anyway? A howdy from down south and I'm going to look up details about the said match, weren't they a bit of a bogey team too at the time? , as I can vaguely recall a cup round with a few replays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was only ten in the stands with my dad and this has conjured up a distant memory, I can see him now going to the tunnel taking his shirt off but obviously can't comment on the game. Was true sir roger was never booked ? , as I recall me dad saying that bobby Charlton told him that your ankles would be black and blue after playing against him , funny how things bring a mental image back. Anyhow pity Torah boy couldn't recall some questions in the pub quiz a few years ago as well as that incident, how are you anyway? A howdy from down south and I'm going to look up details about the said match, weren't they a bit of a bogey team too at the time? , as I can vaguely recall a cup round with a few replays.

 

That quiz was quite difficult, and we did have Sammy Aftershave to carry as well.

 

Leicester were a bogey side for us when we got back into the 1st division. In 1963 they beat us home and away in the league and beat us in the semi-final of The FA Cup at Hillsborough. They'd get a lead and defend with everyone back in their own half. Fuckers to break down, and we didn't score against them until the following season at Filbert Street.in one of the Easter fixtures that set us up for the championship. Yet even that season they had won at Anfield. The supporters hated playing them but Shankly insisted that they were the only team we learned from after promotion. It was learning the hard way. Though  Bill Shankly had tremendous respect for them and their manager, Matt Gillies.

 

Hope things are all shipshape down there, JC. Next time you're in this vicinity we'll take on the mighty brain power of The Crown's intellectuals again. Just hope there's more than twenty snoots in the pot next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous defamation of my good name and reputation. I've instructed Tony Blair to breathe the fire of war up your bottom.

 

 

Let Blair get close enough to my arse  and I'll extinguish his 'breath of fire' with a torrent of Erdinger fueled, scalding, fizzy gravy. .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes look forward to that and I suppose what shanks says goes though I reckon the wretched Blair might be able to forward some advice for a reasonable price. Anyway back to summarizing Proust and hopefully Sammy could brush up on his general knowledge so we could win copious amounts of ale.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was in my first season of going to Anfield. I just remember deep disappointment. I was probably finding it easier to relate to the younger players who seemed fresh like myself! The great 60's side seemed to belong to the older fans, so I related to Hughes,Graham,Heighway etc. So the subbing didn't affect me and the reaction only hit when the papers got onto it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Despite the halt to the Premier League season, transfer rumours never stop and the latest snippet of news regards another left-back being linked to the Reds.

      Football 365 (via Spanish publication Sport) reports that PSG star Layvin Kurzawa is on the radar of Liverpool as they search for specialised cover for Andy Robertson.

      The evergreen James Milner has deputised many times in the role during the tenure of Jürgen Klopp, but in doing so, it takes away some of the strengths he offers in the middle of the pitch.

      Youngsters Yasser Larouci and Adam Lewis have made appearances in domestic cup and pre-season games, but they are both viewed as options for the long term.

      Kurzawa was strongly linked to Arsenal during the January transfer but he stayed put at the French champions with manager Thomas Tuchel very keen to keep hold of him.  

      The 27 year-old has a deal of experience in a domestic sense having also played for Monaco, in European competition for PSG and also on the international stage where he has won 13 caps for France. 

      He also brings a winning pedigree to the table having been part of three title-winning squads with PSG as well as a number of domestic cups.

      With his contract ending in the summer, Liverpool will be able to sign Kurzawa on a free transfer.

      In terms of his strengths, Kurzawa looks to have a nice blend between attacking and a defensive sense.

      In possession, he tries to drive forward with the ball, a trait highlighted by his 1.47 progressive runs up the pitch per 90 minutes this season.

      He likes the ball at his feet with Kurzawa where he has averaged 2.8 dribbles per 90 minutes with a success rate of 56%, and has a pass success rate of 87% during 2019/20.

      Despite being comfortable in possession, Kurzawa is not a playmaking full-back in the way that Robbo and Trent are, although to be honest, not many are in the modern Football landscape.

      An area where Kurzawa could struggle in a Jürgen Klopp side is his defensive positioning and concentration.

      This is along with a lack of confidence in his own ability which many close observers believe is a key reason that he has been in and out of the PSG side this season. 

      That last part makes him sound like a Alberto Moreno clone, but in truth we are not looking for a world beater in this position, just a player that can give Andy Robbo a breather every now and then.

      With that all said, being able to sign Kurzawa could be a pretty savvy move.
      View full article
    • That article just sounds like 'shit we need to write sonething'. Teams will know this isn't a proper training camp and just a necessity to get the season complete, the TV companies off their back and get the players paid again.    Brighton 'intense schedule' fuck off its 9 games over 4 to 6 weeks. You could wrap it up in 3/4 weeks if you had to and it would be no more intense than our schedule over Dec-Jan the last few years. We played 12 games in 37 days this year, yet Brighton are moaning at playing 9 in between 28 and 42 days     Think Brighton might be more on the let's void the season being 2pts outside the relegation zone
    • Coronavirus: Premier League plan to restart season branded unworkable as clubs eye solution   Plans to put players under lockdown for a month to get the season finished have been branded unworkable – because clubs are too picky. The hotel quarantine plan is one idea mooted for Friday's next round of talks between the Premier League, EFL, Football Association and the Professional Footballers’ Association.     In a bid to conclude the season, one proposal is to squeeze remaining games into a condensed time frame in June, behind-closed-doors, with players kept in isolation to protect them from the risk of contracting coronavirus. Stadiums, hotels and training facilities would undergo a “deep clean”, with the players under strict quarantine, to enable the season to be completed by mid-July.   But Christian Machowski, whose company ESEM specialises in travel management for top clubs across Europe, believes the plan is unrealistic, because of the particular demands of the elite teams when it comes to hotels and training facilities.   “There are so many factors that come into play," said Machowski. “When clubs are looking to book hotels, one of the chief issues is what is an acceptable time to drive to a stadium? "Teams don't want to be stuck on a bus for 45 minutes to an hour, travelling to a game. “Everybody wants the best for their team, but there's only a small number of elite hotels that are suitable. “For example, there are two or three hotels in London where all the teams tend to stay when they play there. “To find a venue where 20 teams can find facilities up to the required standard is just not workable."   “In terms of training facilities, teams would also want to be as a close as possible, so that would present problems. “Then you would have to quarantine the same hotel staff for three or four weeks. “And if one team picked up an infection, whether it's a player or member of staff, that's the end of the tournament.   “It's not about teams staying in luxury, it's complicated because the infrastructure is so finely tuned for clubs in terms of what they need.”   Brighton have voiced their opposition to the proposal for a single-city Premier League finale. Officials at the club have major reservations due to concerns over hotel accommodation, the number of pitches required and the intense fixture schedule.   Chief executive Paul Barber also has concerns about even discussing a return to football while the coronavirus casualty rate around the country soars. “As creative as we want to be, people are losing their lives,” said Barber. “This is a serious, serious situation. We're totally driven towards completing the season but, at the moment, it is tough to talk about it.”   Machowski, whose company has handled almost 500 European games and training camps for top clubs over the past 24 years, reckons the number of teams involved also makes the plan impossible to pull off.   “You could maybe get away with it in the Champions League, for example, with a mini-tournament, because you're dealing with fewer teams,” said Machowski.   “But here you're talking about 20 teams and there's so much at stake. It's not like a pre-season tournament where there's a trophy at the end. “This is about titles, about relegation, qualification for the Champions League and Europa League, so no-one should be able to complain that they missed out because maybe the hotel, training facilities, travel or food wasn't right. “So it's not really workable, for so many different reasons.”   https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/coronavirus-premier-league-plan-restart-21789901
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • Online Bingo
×