Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Russia v Ukraine


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

I don't think it's difficult really. NATO is a tool of greedy psychopathic western elites intent on dominating as much of the world as possible, the percentage of GDP spent on defence requirement for each NATO member is a massive grift for defence corps and the "rules based international order" is everyone that bows down to the US. This that don't aren't following "the rules."

You’re one bad dickhead, can’t be doing with your oral diarrhoea anymore. Yet another belter on ignore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/mauritius-chagos-islands-indian-ocean-american-international-criminal-court-b2009993.html%3famp

 

Obviously I wouldn't suggest Russia would be justified in invading a sovereign state,but I do find it quite ironic that we claim the moral high ground on colonial issues

 

 

By that thinking, we'd have allowed Hitler to invade Poland and Russia unopposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

I don't think it's difficult really. NATO is a tool of greedy psychopathic western elites intent on dominating as much of the world as possible, the percentage of GDP spent on defence requirement for each NATO member is a massive grift for defence corps and the "rules based international order" is everyone that bows down to the US. This that don't aren't following "the rules."

I think NATO membership actually saves you some of defence budget money. Didn't your boy Trump rant at the NATO summit how nobody spends any money and everybody expects the US to defend them?

 

3 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

But Eastern Europe has chosen, in the most part, to become members of the EU and some of them NATO. We can’t just leave them alone. That would certainly make them feel less safe. 

All of EE EU members are in NATO, it's like a prerequsite for joining the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I think NATO membership actually saves you some of defence budget money. Didn't your boy Trump rant at the NATO summit how nobody spends any money and everybody expects the US to defend them?

 

All of EE EU members are in NATO, it's like a prerequsite for joining the EU.

I was too lazy to look at the status of a couple of countries, I assumed that some were in the EU and not NATO. I'll happily take your word for it. Point doesn't change of course.

 

But Eastern Europe has chosen, in the most part, to become members of the EU and some of them NATO. We can’t just leave them alone. That would certainly make them feel less safe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

I was too lazy to look at the status of a couple of countries, I assumed that some were in the EU and not NATO. I'll happily take your word for it. Point doesn't change of course.

 

But Eastern Europe has chosen, in the most part, to become members of the EU and some of them NATO. We can’t just leave them alone. That would certainly make them feel less safe. 

I think without NATO, Baltic republics would definitely be very nervous, Estonia and Latvia in particular with their large Russian minorities, ideal for destabilization and even as a possible pretext for creating de facto breakaway provinces, as in Georgia, Moldova and recently Ukraine. Outside of the former USSR area, it would be less drama.

 

NATO is also useful for regional stability in the Balkans, where there is always some powder keg being left close to the fire somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I think NATO membership actually saves you some of defence budget money. Didn't your boy Trump rant at the NATO summit how nobody spends any money and everybody expects the US to defend them?

 

I think NATO membership locks in regular cash for defence corps so it figures that they're happy to get as many countries as possible in on it. It seems ironic that you're going on about "my boy" Trump too when Clinton was one of the main US war hawks that urged military action on Libya, one of the biggest atrocities that NATO is stained with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I think without NATO, Baltic republics would definitely be very nervous, Estonia and Latvia in particular with their large Russian minorities, ideal for destabilization and even as a possible pretext for creating de facto breakaway provinces, as in Georgia, Moldova and recently Ukraine. Outside of the former USSR area, it would be less drama.

 

NATO is also useful for regional stability in the Balkans, where there is always some powder keg being left close to the fire somewhere.

Agreed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

I think NATO membership locks in regular cash for defence corps so it figures that they're happy to get as many countries as possible in on it. It seems ironic that you're going on about "my boy" Trump too when Clinton was one of the main US war hawks that urged military action on Libya, one of the biggest atrocities that NATO is stained with.

I calles him your boy because you supported him (over Clinton).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I calles him your boy because you supported him (over Clinton).

 

I don't remember actively supporting him, I was more focused on pointing out how much of a fraud Clinton was after her campaign had rigged things against Sanders (someone who I did support) and the fact that she chose to blame Russia when Wikileaks exposed that instead of taking any part in the blame herself. There's also the bit about her wanting to take out Syria's air bases around that time whilst Russia were in the country, maybe that would've been another NATO op? And who knows how that one could've ended up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

I don't remember actively supporting him, I was more focused on pointing out how much of a fraud Clinton was after her campaign had rigged things against Sanders (someone who I did support) and the fact that she chose to blame Russia when Wikileaks exposed that instead of taking any part in the blame herself. There's also the bit about her wanting to take out Syria's air bases around that time whilst Russia were in the country, maybe that would've been another NATO op? And who knows how that one could've ended up.

Can you do a bit on how much of a fraud Trump is then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Can you do a bit on how much of a fraud Trump is then? 

 

I don't feel any need to, it's common knowledge and I don't know of anyone trying to avoid it, unlike what was going on with Clinton in 2016. And her campaign actively supported him way more than anything I could have done with their pied piper strategy, it could've even been one of the main reasons he ended up being president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has given his first reaction to reports from Russia that it is pulling back some of its troops from the border area close to Ukraine.

Speaking to BBC Eastern Europe Correspondent Sarah Rainsford at a military training ground in western Ukraine, Mr Zelensky said "we don't see any troop withdrawal yet" and "for now it's just statements".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, M_B said:

By that thinking, we'd have allowed Hitler to invade Poland and Russia unopposed.

Like I said,I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying I find it quite ironic when we are so opposed to foreign imperialism, when historically, we are probally one oif the worst offenders

And whilst puton may be a bit of a cunt,I'm not sure if compare him to Hitler just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has given his first reaction to reports from Russia that it is pulling back some of its troops from the border area close to Ukraine.

Speaking to BBC Eastern Europe Correspondent Sarah Rainsford at a military training ground in western Ukraine, Mr Zelensky said "we don't see any troop withdrawal yet" and "for now it's just statements".

 

Zelensky; salt of the earth, Ukraine has their fair share of far right thugs;

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/05/01/ukr-m01.html

 

Let's not forget, nice bunch of lads,

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/13/odes-m13.html

 

Salt of the earth,

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cohen-ukraine-commentary-idUSKBN1GV2TY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Arniepie said:

Like I said,I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying I find it quite ironic when we are so opposed to foreign imperialism, when historically, we are probally one oif the worst offenders

 

The important word in your sentence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

Zelensky; salt of the earth, Ukraine has their fair share of far right thugs;

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/05/01/ukr-m01.html

Always has. Eastern Europe proved a hotbed, particularly for countries where the German invasion pushed the Russians out. The enemy of my enemy and all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were loads of Ukrainians concentration camp guards, in fact most of the dudes at Auschwitz (inside the wire) were Eastern European I think, with the Germans usually guarding the outside. 

 

There were actually Russian SS units though, bonkers as it sounds, as they were opposed to Stalin and obviously didn't realise at the time they were earmarked for the ovens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, M_B said:

Yet. Defender of the fatherland day in Russia is Feb 23rd.

“After Feb. 20 was always the more important time frame,” said MICHAEL KOFMAN, an expert on Russia’s military at the CNA think tank. “We’re looking to see what Russian forces do then.”

That’s when the largest military exercise since the Cold War is scheduled to end, after which leaders in Moscow and Minsk promised Putin’s troops would head home.

 

“Not a single Russian serviceman, not a single piece of equipment will remain in Belarus after the completion of exercises with Russia,” Belarussian Foreign Minister VLADIMIR MAKEI. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...