Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?

[aRdja]

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Within their parties or the electorate? 

Either

[TheHowieLama]

2 minutes ago, viRdjil said:

 

Is Corbyn more divisive than Trump or Johnson?

 

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Within their parties or the electorate? 

 

Stig is onto it -- they both enjoy complete commitment within their parties

[aRdja]

Just now, TheHowieLama said:

 

 

Stig is onto it -- they both enjoy complete commitment within their parties

Only when Trump actually became the president, not before.

[Strontium]

Jezza's not divisive. He's done a brilliant job of uniting centrists. He needs to be allowed to finish what he started.

[TheHowieLama]

4 minutes ago, viRdjil said:

Only when Trump actually became the president, not before.

No mate -- as soon as he became the Republican candidate they were all in (that includes the Religious Right who somehow forgave him for being an adulterer - and conveniently forgot that he had been pro Choice for years, and the Military supporters who did the same despite him being a draft dodger and actively denigrating actual soldiers  -- he would not have been elected otherwise.

[Bjornebye]

4 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

 

Stig is onto it -- they both enjoy complete commitment within their parties

Because they are shit scared of them. I reckon deep down a lot of them hate their leaders. Do you honestly think Gove sits at home thinking Johnson is the right man for the job? Trump chopped his staff to pieces in his first 6 months until he got nodding dogs around him. So long as they toe the leader (not necessarily the party) line then they are safe and their pockets are secure. 

 

Corbyn is threatening to even things out meaning they will be hit in the pocket. The greedy cunts are shit scared of that. In all parties not just Labour. 

[TheHowieLama]

2 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Because they are shit scared of them.

I am talking about the voting public - staffers can get to fuck, they deserve whatever they get.

[Bjornebye]

4 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

Jezza's not divisive. He's done a brilliant job of uniting centrists. He needs to be allowed to finish what he started.

 

[aRdja]

2 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

 

Also didn’t the centrist experiment fail miserably?

[Strontium]

[Bjornebye]

3 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

I am talking about the voting public - staffers can get to fuck, they deserve whatever they get.

The difference is that with Corbyn it is media and slander led whereas with Trump and Johnson half the people can see them for the utter lunatics that they are. The other half are themselves utter fucking lunatics. 

[Bjornebye]

1 minute ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

It wasn't just aimed at that post. I'd had it to post for a few days because it pretty much sums you up on political threads fella. 

[Strontium]

Just now, Bjornebye said:

It wasn't just aimed at that post. I'd had it to post for a few days because it pretty much sums you up on political threads fella. 

 

It really doesn't. Compare my comments here with comments from you and others in the Lib Dem thread, then tell me that mine are more "insulting" and more likely "to emotionally manipulate an angry reaction".

[Bjornebye]

3 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

It really doesn't. Compare my comments here with comments from you and others in the Lib Dem thread, then tell me that mine are more "insulting" and more likely "to emotionally manipulate an angry reaction".

Ok. 

 

Yours are more insulting and more likely to emotionally manipulate an angry reaction. 

[Pureblood]

4 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

It really doesn't. Compare my comments here with comments from you and others in the Lib Dem thread, then tell me that mine are more "insulting" and more likely "to emotionally manipulate an angry reaction".

The Lib Dems are proven cunts, though.  No smoke without fire. 

[Strontium]

2 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Ok. 

 

Yours are more insulting and more likely to emotionally manipulate an angry reaction. 

 

That's preposterous. On the last page alone of the Lib Dem thread, you've referred, across three separate posts, to various Lib Dems being two-faced liars, Tory appeasers and the leader being a thunder-cunt.

 

Now if you want to say those things, it's entirely up to you, but it's a bit rich to then claim I'm being more insulting and provocative by saying that Jeremy Corbyn has done a great job of uniting centrists.

[Tony Moanero]

Korky the Cat > Gnasher

[Strontium]

6 minutes ago, TK421 said:

The Lib Dems are proven cunts, though.  No smoke without fire. 

 

Special pleading. My favourite fallacy.

[Pureblood]

3 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

That's preposterous. On the last page alone of the Lib Dem thread, you've referred, across three separate posts, to various Lib Dems being two-faced liars, Tory appeasers and the leader being a thunder-cunt.

 

Now if you want to say those things, it's entirely up to you, but it's a bit rich to then claim I'm being more insulting and provocative by saying that Jeremy Corbyn has done a great job of uniting centrists.

I think the difference is that people have the odd snipe on the Lib Dem thread, whereas you post on here prolifically and you're a shit. 

[Strontium]

6 minutes ago, TK421 said:

I think the difference is that people have the odd snipe on the Lib Dem thread, whereas you post on here prolifically and you're a shit. 

 

I don't post in this thread any more than a dozen or so others do. And my posts rarely even descend into snipe territory.

[aRdja]

This is really boring guys. SD hates Corbyn, let him snipe... just like how I hate loads of right wing politicians like Farage, Tommy Robinson and FBPE twats like James O’Brien... I would like to be able to continue spew bile at them, without people screaming for this mythical ‘balance’. 

[TheHowieLama]

6 minutes ago, viRdjil said:

 I would like to be able to continue spew bile at them, without people screaming for this mythical ‘balance’. 

Take it to the Violence thread...

[Bjornebye]

29 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

That's preposterous. On the last page alone of the Lib Dem thread, you've referred, across three separate posts, to various Lib Dems being two-faced liars, Tory appeasers and the leader being a thunder-cunt.

 

Now if you want to say those things, it's entirely up to you, but it's a bit rich to then claim I'm being more insulting and provocative by saying that Jeremy Corbyn has done a great job of uniting centrists.

Its just my opinion SD. Nothing more nothing less. 

 

Jo Swinson is a thunder-cunt though. 

[moof]

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

The problem is then it's too late, we could get a Labour or Labour led coalition within the next six months if there's someone else at the helm who's less divisive. 

Mate, anyone with a similar policy platform will be labelled “divisive”. Another of the great ironies of this era of politics, given that it’s the least divisive and most inclusive policy platform of the past 50 years.

 

Also ironic given that people who support Corbyn are derided as being a “personality cult”, when the justification of labelling him divisive is little more than a bullshit notion of personality politics. I despise this idea of appeasing corporate interests by picking a leader that conforms to their vision, and that’s what it will take to get a “fair hearing” for Labour. 

[TheHowieLama]

1 minute ago, moof said:

Mate, anyone with a similar policy platform will be labelled “divisive”.

The suggestion is he is divisive within the Labour camp.