Liverpool withdraws from government 'big society' pilot.

[Fugitive]

The leader of Liverpool City Council has written to the prime minister withdrawing its involvement from his "big society" plans.

 

The city was one of four pilot areas for the scheme, aimed at giving community groups and volunteers more control over their local services.

 

But council leader Joe Anderson said government cuts had threatened the future of many local volunteer groups.

 

He has now told David Cameron he can no longer support the initiative. When he announced the "big society" in Liverpool last July, Mr Cameron said community groups should be able to run post offices, libraries, transport services and shape housing projects.

 

The concept would be a "big advance for people power", he said.

While reducing the budget deficit was his "duty", the prime minister said giving individuals and communities more control over their destinies was what excited him and was something that had underpinned his philosophy since he became Conservative leader in 2005.

 

Merseyside television producer Phil Redmond has already attacked the "big society" idea, saying it has been undermined by public spending cuts.

 

The Brookside and Hollyoaks creator had originally been a fan of the concept, taking charge of a project involving volunteering and cultural activities in Liverpool.

 

He said: "I do remain a strong supporter of the principal behind big society, because it wasn't too long ago that the media was full of stories about Big Brother, too much red tape, surveillance society, we need to get engaged with society and so on.

 

"It just came at the wrong moment."

 

He said there was a need to make sure there was a separation between the big society plans and the cuts.

 

"With hindsight they should perhaps have delayed the big society agenda until everybody got used to the idea that we had to react to what was happening on the Wall Street stock exchange," he added.

 

In his letter to the prime minister, Mr Anderson said: "You will recall that you announced Liverpool as one of four "big society" vanguard areas last summer with Phil Redmond leading the initiative.

 

"Later in the year, Liverpool City Council was asked to assist in this initiative around some key projects, including running a 'parallel vanguard programme'.

 

"We took up this challenge wholeheartedly and have invested significant resources to deliver this substantial programme of activity."

 

However, he said the government promised to work with the council to "remove some of the problems and blockages" that were preventing them from making the programme work.

 

He said the government had failed to deliver any of the changes the council asked for.

 

Mr Anderson, who is leader of the Labour Party in Liverpool, said: "Liverpool has been doing the "big society" for many years. We call it 'working with our communities' and it is something we are very much committed to."

 

But he said the loss of more than £100m of Area Based Grants to Liverpool has put many organisations at risk.

 

"How can the city council support the big society and its aim to help communities do more for themselves when we will have to cut the lifeline to hundreds of these vital and worthwhile groups?," he said.

 

"I have therefore come to the conclusion that Liverpool City Council can no longer support the big society initiative, as a direct consequence of your funding decisions."

 

Sean Brennan, leader of Sutton Council in south London - one of the other pilot areas - said the authority would continue to take part in the scheme.

 

Mr Cameron's official spokesman said Mr Anderson's letter had been received and Downing Street was considering its response.

 

"We are looking into what the particular issues are and whether there were particular barriers and problems in that particular project, and seeing if there is anything we can do to unlock that," said the spokesman.

 

"What we are trying to do here is something new and something slightly different to what has been done in the past.

 

"The purpose of putting in place these first projects was to see what would work and that is what we are doing."

 

A spokesperson from the Department for Communities and Local Government said: "The big society vanguards are led by local communities and people - not central government.

 

"The initial four vanguard areas have been invaluable training grounds and have demonstrated where barriers, both cultural and practical, should be removed through deregulation, direct support or measures in the Localism Bill.

 

"Every bit of the public sector needs to do its bit to help reduce the massive budget deficit, and help ensure jobs and economic stability.

"But the new government is giving councils real freedoms to promote local economic growth and to focus resources on frontline services and local priorities."

 

BBC News - Liverpool withdraws from government 'big society' pilot

[VladimirIlyich]

Never really thought this 'big society' stuff was anything more than a Tory buzzword with no real ideas on what it means or how it should be administered and run.

 

You cant just say to volunteer groups with no funding,'run that library' or 'manage that post office' without the funds and expertise to back it.

 

These ideas cant be run on fresh air.

[stevebaby]

Progress.They've gone from wanting people to work for shit wages to wanting people to work for no wages.

Next,you'll be paying them for the privelege of no wages.

[Section_31]

I've got no problem with the theory of community groups and charities stepping in to help out where they can - but they need the cash to do it, I know quite a few charities which have running costs of £1m+ a year. As one I spoke to a while ago said 'voluntary doesn't mean free'.

 

Problem is, the Government think it does. The 'big society' they were hoping for was one that looked after istelf and didn't require state support - even though with the other hand it's still more than happy to tax you with fuel duty rises and what not.

[WaltonRed]

fuck off Cameron, we'll fight back...again

[captainharris]

I work in the third sector. . I was at a big society summit last week and it was clear that the Tories haven't got a clue what their doing with the idea. They're making it up as they go along.

 

Somehow they think that by slashing all funding for ...the public and 3rd sector that we're somehow going to WANT to do something for nothing. How about maintaining funding levels and help build capacity to support community groups?

 

How can you say you want to develop a culture for volunteering and communities providing services and then go and cut V, the national youth volunteering programme?

 

The infrastructure was there, it's taken years to develop, it only needed a helping hand and the Big Society could maybe have worked, especially in Liverpool as our chairty and voluntary sector is well established with a lot of cross collaboration and partnerships and community engagement. But no, it was announced that 2/3 of jobs are going to be cut from LCVS.

 

The whole sector is being decimated (as well as the public sector), the two aren't mutually exclusive. Well in Joe Anderson is what I say. Although it's hardly surprising that the only Labour council in one of the 'vanguard areas' is the first to pull out, but was also the only one who lost a tenth of its funding.

 

This article just sums it up for me...

Big society tsar Lord Wei 'doesn't have enough time to perform role' | Politics | The Guardian