Keir Starmer

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Arniepie said:

But the liberals did really badly didnt they?

Labour were fucked either way over brexit and going for a 2nd referendum made perfect sense. 

Sadly too many threw their support behind that fucking buffoon and if anyone is too Blame its them.

It was awkward I agree.

[Bjornebye]

2 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

But the liberals did really badly didnt they?

Labour were fucked either way over brexit and going for a 2nd referendum made perfect sense. 

Sadly too many threw their support behind that fucking buffoon and if anyone is too Blame its them.

The Lib Dems had the chance to do the right thing and stand by their so called morals. Unfortunately they were as genuine as their leaflets. 

 

Mind you, Labour wind me up so fucking much right now I'd vote green but the closest chance of getting this revolting gaggle of cunts out is Labour. 

[Gnasher]

8 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

The lib dems always do shit .. well because... they are shit and your typical liberal democrat is about as liberal as ann widdecombes nipples 

They did brilliantly with Charlie Kennedy, about 50 odd seats I think, I voted for them. Lots of people hate overseas wars.

[Bjornebye]

3 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

They did brilliantly with Charlie Kennedy, about 50 odd seats I think, I voted for them. Lots of people hate overseas wars.

I notice your conversation recently about him stopped abruptly when you spoke facts. Usual

stuff. 

 

 

Although thats rare for you mate.... Lets not start having a 69 yet 

 

[Gnasher]

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

I notice your conversation recently about him stopped abruptly when you spoke facts. Usual

stuff. 

 

 

Although thats rare for you mate.... Lets not start having a 69 yet 

 

Just checked, Kennedy and the lib dems got 62 seats in 2005 on an anti war ticket, their biggest number since the 1920s an anti war ticket  Stronts now calls 'guff'. 

[Strontium]

Gnasher isn't in the same neighbourhood as facts. The Lib Dems never opposed intervention in Afghanistan, ever.

[Bjornebye]

2 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Just checked, Kennedy and the lib dems got 62 seats in 2005 on an anti war ticket, their biggest number since the 1920s an anti war ticket  Stronts now calls 'guff'. 

No, they spoke out against the Iraq invasion but actually backed it on paper. They let themselves be seen to have opposed it until it came out that they were full of shit. 

[Bjornebye]

2 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Gnasher isn't in the same neighbourhood as facts. The Lib Dems never opposed intervention in Afghanistan, ever.

Am I? 

[Strontium]

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Am I? 

 

You occasionally stagger into it by accident.

[Bjornebye]

4 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

You occasionally stagger into it by accident.

Hahaha arguably the nicest thing you've ever said about me 

[Gnasher]

8 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Gnasher isn't in the same neighbourhood as facts. The Lib Dems never opposed intervention in Afghanistan, ever.

No you're right, but in fairness Charlie and his sandle wearers were a lot less blood thirsty than the other two mobs.

[Gnasher]

"Social media users'

 

Anyone need a lift home? Wtf?

 

 

[Bjornebye]

The fucks that got to do with Starmer? Are you calling him gay?

[Gnasher]

28 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

The fucks that got to do with Starmer? Are you calling him gay?

No, wrong Fred.

[Gnasher]

Good this from Starmer/Labour, his youth policy the other week was also quite good, 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/aug/22/labour-to-pledge-shake-up-of-universal-credit-as-part-of-wider-new-deal

 

[Bjornebye]

13 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

No, wrong Fred.

Haha, nice 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

14 hours ago, Gnasher said:

"Social media users'

 

Anyone need a lift home? Wtf?

 

 

In what sense is that"replacing patrol cars"?

 

It's a car. It patrols. It's a patrol car.

 

It's almost as if the "anti-woke" bellends tell fibs.

[Strontium]

29 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

 

 

Odd that she hasn't supplied the text of the letter.

[Bjornebye]

17 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Odd that she hasn't supplied the text of the letter.

Why would she? She isn’t a Lib Dem so her chances of being a liar are much slimmer 

[Strontium]

[Bjornebye]

Hahaha deflection again.

[Strontium]

Only you could go from demanding evidence that the Taliban are killing schoolgirls to denying that evidence for an outlandish claim about Labour Party procedure is required, in the blink of an eye.

[Bjornebye]

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Only you could go from demanding evidence that the Taliban are killing schoolgirls to denying that evidence for an outlandish claim about Labour Party procedure is required, in the blink of an eye.

Only to a known hypocrite and liar. Only you could deflect like a Tory but claim to be a liberal 

[Strontium]