Jump to content

  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Boris Johnson

Section_31

By Section_31,
in GF - General Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bjornebye
Bjornebye
Captain Turdseye
Captain Turdseye

The United Kingdom of America has quite the ring to it.    Make Britain shite again. 

TheHowieLama
TheHowieLama

Posted Images

Barrington Womble Grand Master

Barrington Womble

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

I don't see how closing parliament is illegal. It's under handed and a really shitty way to go about things which is what you expect from Tories and Boris  but how is it breaking the law.

Because if there's emails saying "let's prorogue parliament to keep the heat off for brexit", then they go to the queen and say "we need to prorogue as it's a new government and we need to set an agenda", it's an abuse of their power. If it's against the law is an interesting debate as we don't have a written constitution and it requires our public servants to act within the spirit of the precedents that have been set previously, but I'm pretty sure if the government told the queen it wanted to prorogue to avoid being accountable to parliament, she could have rightly told them to fuck off. It's why the cases are not challenging what the queen did, but the advice given to her by Johnson and his government. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pureblood Grand Master

Pureblood

Posted
Posted
Just now, Lizzie Birdsworths Wrinkled Chopper said:

You really are such a snarky little cock aren’t you mate.

I've no idea where that came from. My "phew" was meant to indicate my own relief that I wasn't misinterpreting Iain Dale's political bias after you kindly clarified your initial reply.  I wasn't having a go at you, snarky or otherwise.

 

Yours baffledly

TK421

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dougie Do'ins Grand Master

Dougie Do'ins

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Barry Wom said:

Because if there's emails saying "let's prorogue parliament to keep the heat off for brexit", then they go to the queen and say "we need to prorogue as it's a new government and we need to set an agenda", it's an abuse of their power. If it's against the law is an interesting debate as we don't have a written constitution and it requires our public servants to act within the spirit of the precedents that have been set previously, but I'm pretty sure if the government told the queen it wanted to prorogue to avoid being accountable to parliament, she could have rightly told them to fuck off. It's why the cases are not challenging what the queen did, but the advice given to her by Johnson and his government. 

Surely to fuck there's something wrong where some antiquated law or whatever the fuck it is that says the PM has to approach and explain to a 93 year old person in such a complex matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Pistonbroke

Guest Pistonbroke

Posted
Posted

The BBC are wank these days and have literally no balls. They just let themselves be used by whichever Government is in office and are prepared to keep the TV licence money rolling in. It's pretty sad that those of you in the UK basically pay for that slanty faced twat Kuensenberg's biased views. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bjornebye Grand Master

Bjornebye

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Scooby Dudek said:

Labour activist makes Johnson lie about no press being there in, in front of the press that were there. 

BBC quite right to have a go at this manipulative dad.

He probably heard Johnson was going to the hospital and left his child outside all night to make sure it got sick, what a cunt.

Made her drink bleach clearly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
moof Grand Master

moof

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Pistonbroke said:

The BBC are wank these days and have literally no balls. They just let themselves be used by whichever Government is in office and are prepared to keep the TV licence money rolling in. It's pretty sad that those of you in the UK basically pay for that slanty faced twat Kuensenberg's biased views. 

It’s been terrible for years but the downward spiral really accelerated when they started putting tories in executive and leadership roles. Pretty much the entirety of the news output is dictated by former and current tories, and it shows

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sir roger Grand Master

sir roger

Posted
Posted

The brilliance of the guy oozes through in his clinical takedown of the EU's position as reported in The Independent

 

It comes after reports that proposals brought to Brussels by UK negotiators amounted to the old agreement, with the section on the Irish backstop simply crossed out in the text.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...