Would you take Momo back for the right price?

[Guest PurpleNose]

160 times the player Poulsen is.

 

Definately have him back.

[Skrtel Milk]

Over Poulsen? Yes. Yes indeed!

 

I

[WaltonRed]

Momo is boss

[Unrighteous]

This is key for me too, we have absolutely no aggression in our pressing now that Masch is gone, hence teams coming to Anfield taking the piss... I disagree with the above posters saying we need a passing midfielder, it's a lot more urgent to get someone that can actually pressure the opposition, and even win the ball back!!

 

If we lose the ball in midfield now (and we have done that a lot so far), teams are cutting through our slow back four at will, with Momo back they would at least feel some pressure instead of being able to walk towards our box.

 

Oh, and yes, I'd have him back in a heartbeat!

 

We simply need to change our focus. Sitting back passively, like Hodgson wants us to do is never going to work.

 

I'm not a fan of Rafa but his idea of pressing high when you lose the ball is the right way to play. Of course, we need to play with a high line, as well, which we never did.

[Lucky Pierre]

I thought Poulsen has looked shit in every game he's played for and was a bit mystified with a few people singing his praises in the first couple of games but put it down to wanting the new boy to be good.

 

Momo is boss.

 

I thought he looked tidy in his first one or two games, and it was acknowledged that he had basically had no pre season or anything so was gonna take a bit of time to settle in and find his feet.

 

Fact is he has now had many more games and is still walking round at the same pace and is losing even the simplest ability to find his own man with a pass.

 

The game for Denmark the other day was shocking and I will be devestated if his name is on the team sheet having seen that Denmark performance.

I seem to remembers having one half decent match where he started to get stuck into tackles and wasnt one of the worst 3 players on the pitch. Sunderland maybe?

How much did we receive for Poulsen?

 

He's still here...

[paddyberger15]

The Momo we sold 3 years ago because he wasn't good enough you mean? That Momo?

Just because Poulsen is shit doesn't mean it should be the Green light to re-sign a player we let go for the right reasons ages ago.

[lamai]

not a hope

[Bobby Hundreds]

 

 

He's still here...

 

Surely we got compensation.

[Liverpool09]

I would take Momo over Lucas any day. Come back Momo!!

[fowler9]

And if he's not available?

 

 

think oh fuck we did we loan out Aquilani

[Torvald Utne]

We simply need to change our focus. Sitting back passively, like Hodgson wants us to do is never going to work.

 

I'm not a fan of Rafa but his idea of pressing high when you lose the ball is the right way to play. Of course, we need to play with a high line, as well, which we never did.

 

The older carragher gets the further back the line goes...he's just signed a 2 year extension.

[dennis tooth]

I'd take Hamaan back right now, fucking Milton Keynes Dons.

[RoboRiise]

160 times the player Poulsen is.

[Guest PurpleNose]

160 times the player Poulsen is.

 

Definitely have him back.

[dave]

I'd have Gary Mac over some of the dross we have in midfield currently, even if he is 107 years old.

[RoboRiise]

Definitely have him back.

 

 

Bastard, I checked as well - must have skipped over your post.

 

I was wrong anyway, he's at least 320 times the player that Poulsen is.

[Cherry Ghost]

I thought Rafa getting 8m for Momo was one of the best pieces of business he did which sort of indicates my thoughts. I think Sammy Lee, as a club employee, could probably do a better job than Poulsen and not only is he 86, he's only 3' 4"

[WaltonRed]

I'd take him back

[billypilgrimnz]

No. His passing was absolutely abysmal. We have enough players with that attribute already in the team.

[billypilgrimnz]

The older carragher gets the further back the line goes...he's just signed a 2 year extension.

 

Accomodating Carragher is increasingly becoming a millstone to the team.

[Jonny83]

Yes on the basis that he's better than what we currently have, at least 640 times better. Yeah we got rid but that was because we got the opportunity to sign Masch who was and is better, but has since fucked off.

 

No on the basis that we should probably be setting our sights a little higher, but who and are they available, willing and affordable?

[Best Believe It]

1280 times the player Poulson is.

[Best Believe It]

Each year without investment seemed to multiply the problems we had in our playing squad. All defensive positions need investment now - centre back, full back and defensive midfield.

 

I love Momo but if we can sign someone better we should.

[Roy the Rover]

Much, much, much better than Poulsen and Lucas put together. Then again, even Robbie Savage is much, much, much better than Poulsen and Lucas put together.

[sir roger]

2560 times the player Poulsen is , but I'd still prefer Scott Parker to be honest.