Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SasaS said:

Trump is a populist, thrives on division and fear of the Other, I still think he may benefit from the protests, if they take a more violent turn. These protests are a reaction, they don't have actual demands you can act on, so to sustain them for a longer period, they can be manipulated, redirected toward the tactics and goals of the radicals. Then all people who voted for Trump would rally around him even more in November, and they would still have the numbers.   

I strongly suspect that's what whoever authorised the police violence in Washington last night was banking on.  If the crowd had reacted violently, he could have made his "law and order" speech to a soundtrack of the brave boys in blue dealing with a vicious mob and plenty of people would have lapped it up.  Instead, the Washington protestors pissed on his chips by remaining peaceful, despite the attacks, which just underscored how dangerous and despotic the stuff he was saying was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

The whole history of the country has been twisted by that mad contradiction: yes, it was founded on the principles of justice and freedom, but it was also built on genocide and slavery.

 

So really, it was based entirely on the British model it supposedly revolted against.

 

They just wanted to own their own patent on it.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, skaro said:

 

 

If he's the Antichrist, I want my money back on those inaccurate descriptions in Revelations.

 

He's not what it said on the tin.  Tinpot, more like.

 

 

 

 

 

Quote

"Then the beast was allowed to speak great blasphemies against God. And he was given authority to do whatever he wanted for forty-two months. And he spoke terrible words of blasphemy against God, slandering his name and his dwelling—that is, those who dwell in heaven. And the beast was allowed to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them. And he was given authority to rule over every tribe and people and language and nation. And all the people who belong to this world worshiped the beast. They are the ones whose names were not written in the Book of Life before the world was made—the Book that belongs to the Lamb who was slaughtered."

 

Quote

"The ten horns are ten kings who will come from this kingdom. After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three kings. He will speak against the Most High and oppress his saints and try to change the set times and the laws. The saints will be handed over to him for a time, times and half a time."

 

Quote

"For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect."

 

All from that fantasy novel, The Bible.

 

If anybody would have the inside track on the Antichrist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I strongly suspect that's what whoever authorised the police violence in Washington last night was banking on.  If the crowd had reacted violently, he could have made his "law and order" speech to a soundtrack of the brave boys in blue dealing with a vicious mob and plenty of people would have lapped it up.  Instead, the Washington protestors pissed on his chips by remaining peaceful, despite the attacks, which just underscored how dangerous and despotic the stuff he was saying was.


That was my thinking as well and there’s probably some truth to it, but I also think that if they wanted to they could have quite easily planted a few ‘troublemakers’ in the crowd to make things look worse than they were. It’s actually surprising that they didn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The US 2nd Amendment lot who demanded they need guns to protect themselves against a tyrannical government turning the army on the people, now finally have that tyrannical government turning the Army on their people, and what do they do? Support the tyrannical government, of course

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...