Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.


Chris
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sorry to say to you and RK, but the attitude of Anelka at Liverpool was spot on, and not signing him was one of the biggest mistake's I've ever witnessed at Liverpool, especially with who replaced him.

 

I for one will never forgive that french twat Houllier for what he did to Anelka.

 

 

so true...we dropped a real bollock there.i reckon he would still be in red today if houllier had signed him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry to say to you and RK, but the attitude of Anelka at Liverpool was spot on, and not signing him was one of the biggest mistake's I've ever witnessed at Liverpool, especially with who replaced him.

 

I for one will never forgive that french twat Houllier for what he did to Anelka.

 

 

I agree that it was a huge mistake not to sign him & to sign Diouf instead was absolutely criminal. I've heard that Anelka behaved himself in his time at Liverpool and was a decent lad off the pitch, but I just think that he has not and never will fulfill his true potential. I believe that when he is on form & up for it, he is every bit as talented & explosive as players like Torres and Henry. I just think he lacks real desire to be a top player. Maybe he doesn't realise just how good he is/could have been. He just seems to be going through the motions at Chelsea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liverpool will rue letting Anelka go - The National Newspaper

 

It didn’t work out for him at Liverpool after his loan spell in 2002 and that was a shame because I think he would have done well had he signed permanently. He could have been wearing Liverpool red today instead of Chelsea blue.

I'd say it worked out for him very well during his time with us. It was just that the manager at the time cut his nose off to spite his face/sign a bag of shite instead and line his pockets* just as he did with Jari Litamen.

 

*delete as applicable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say it worked out for him very well during his time with us. It was just that the manager at the time cut his nose off to spite his face just as he did with Jari Litamen.

 

An attacking partnership of a fully fit Litmanen in his prime and Anelka would have been some combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to say when Anelka was with us I thought he was quality and offered the team so much more than Owen ever did. He was head and shoulders above him as a player.

 

His attitude was also fine and i've always got the feeling that he wished Houllier had signed him...of course we spent the same money on Diouf so that went well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anelka isn't fit to lace El Nino's boots. He's a very good player and on his day he can be lethal. However, Torres is the best centre forward in the world. Anelka would have improved us back then when GH let him go, but he wasn't especially amazing in his time here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was really sorry we didn't buy Anelka, as I was impressed by him during his time here. It's a pity we couldn't afford him when he decided to leave Bolton. I'd have loved to have seen him and Torres up front, with Anelka taking the provider role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Anelka is a very talented player, but lacks the passion and desire to be a top player. However, he will be a threat if he plays tomorrow but I would rather that we faced Anelka than Drogba.

 

 

Agreed. That inself shows Anelka is not the the top echelon of Strikers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are right. He always refers to his time at Liverpool fondly and how he had a good rapport with the fans & how he wanted the move to become a permanent one. It was a catastrophe that we bought Diouf instead of Anelka.

 

He's full of shit though, we've all seen our fair share of badge-kissers in our time to know you can't take players words' at face value.

 

Anelka has never done anything to make me think he gives a flying fuck about the game of football in the slightest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...