Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Gibraltar


Sugar Ape
 Share

Recommended Posts

I see. You've now added (a) a claim about longevity to (b) your original claim about demographics. Meanwhile, you reject © a claim about proximity.

 

So, if an imperial power conquers a territory © anywhere on the planet, (a) holds onto it for long enough, and (b) forcibly (re)populates it in the desired fashion, then said territory becomes a legitimate possession? Yes?

 

I think you're ignoring what I take to be a crucial factor: the very fact of conquest and its ethico-political implications.

 

I'm not mate and i quite agree with it in the modern world.

Where it gets complicated is where do you draw the line?

300 years not long enough? How about 700 years? Gascony and Normandy were owned by the English crown then. Should the French give them back?

How about Latin America being given back to the Incas? Perhaps the American rebels should hand themselves back to the Crown as they were taken through conquest?

I reckon pretty much every square cm of land in the world has been conquered and re-conquered at some stage...such is life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not mate and i quite agree with it in the modern world.

Where it gets complicated is where do you draw the line?

300 years not long enough? How about 700 years? Gascony and Normandy were owned by the English crown then. Should the French give them back?

How about Latin America being given back to the Incas? Perhaps the American rebels should hand themselves back to the Crown as they were taken through conquest?

I reckon pretty much every square cm of land in the world has been conquered and re-conquered at some stage...such is life

 

Also, let's not forget it's not Barcelona we're talking about here, it's a small mountain with a few pubs and a casino.

 

Genuinely, hand on heart, if the Spanish took over a sliver of shite on the end of Cornwall and made a success of the place I'd take my hat off to them.

 

Any Hispanic peoples talking about colonialism have got some balls, they're the reason half the Incas are now called Martinez, I always think that when I hear the exotically named Cristina Hernandez talking about colonialism in Argentina.

 

The reason England forged an empire in the first place was because its ships kept getting arseraped by the Spanish until Drake decided to give them a taste of their own medicine, Portsmouth was nothing more than a sleepy fishing village then until it dawned on blighty that a good defence was a good offence. Nobody has raped and plundered like the Spanish.

Edited by Section_31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a tiny place, you can walk from one end to the other in about 40 minutes. We had a look around the shops first day we got there which took about half an hour, checked out the 4 or 5 pubs by the casino and that's it. You're done.

 

There are still some decent things to do there like going up the rock to see the Monkeys or going to watch dolphins ( though I'd maybe give sightseeing in a boat around there a miss at the minute ) but the actual place is about the size of Aintree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spain isnt even a country as we recognise it. Everybody outside of the Madrid area hates the cunts there and are very regionalistic?(if thats even a word) They are a Republic made up of many different areas and traditions and most couldnt really give a fuck about Gibraltar,I imagine. The Basques,Catalans and a few others would have no problem seeing the central government take a good fucking from the UK over anything and would probably side with the UK or be neutral,regarding public opinion.

Blown out of all proportion for me and just a bit of political tap dancing i reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not mate and i quite agree with it in the modern world.

Where it gets complicated is where do you draw the line?

300 years not long enough? How about 700 years? Gascony and Normandy were owned by the English crown then. Should the French give them back?

How about Latin America being given back to the Incas? Perhaps the American rebels should hand themselves back to the Crown as they were taken through conquest?

I reckon pretty much every square cm of land in the world has been conquered and re-conquered at some stage...such is life

 

And while we're on the subject, when are the English going to give England back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been to Gibraltar, and I can vouch for the fact that it is a fucking shithole. Like a shit army town with nasty tourist tat shops and sun. The British charge in there and make these places shit. See also The Falklands, Africa and the Eurovision Song Contest.

 

Glad I'm not the only one who thinks that Gib is just the 'Costa del Corby': The s Spanish can fuck off out of it though. It may be a shithole, but it's our shithole, goddammit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hypothetical scenario:

 

The government of India spots some geo-political advantage in occupying Leicester. So, it sets about populating the city by military means, expelling the native population as necessary.

 

Needless to say, this doesn't go down very well with the English population more generally, a population which can't quite understand how India could "legitimately" claim such a distant territory under such morally questionable circumstances.

 

But, fear not, India offers an argument for such legitimacy, an argument which no democrat worthy of the name could possibly reject. India has a democratic mandate in Leicester! The vast majority of the population of Leicester feels Indian, wishes to remain part of India... and even claims to have turned the wasteland that was Leicester into some magnificent monument to Indian civilization.

 

I was in Leicester the other week.

I don't believe your scenario is hypothetical,- although I don't think the population was by military means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...