Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I can only welcome their intention to fact check and provide alternative view on everything which will be said in the 2020 election, but somehow I doubt they will be able to do that.  

 

On the violence inducing tweet, as far as I can see from the media, they first blocked it than made it visible in the public interest or something. And that is sort of my point, it is not their role to block stupid or harmful stuff US President comes up with, public should know what Trump is saying (tweeting). It's up to the public to react. The problem is not so much that you are effectively de-platforming the US President, the problem is that you have the US President that you feel needs de-platforming.  And it shouldn't be Twitter's decision, the public has a right to know he wrote that tweet and be able to see it.  

Like I said, the tweet was from his personal account, not the POTUS account.  Also, they didn't take it down; they put the equivalent of NSFW tags on it: "this tweet contravenes our policies, but if you want to see it, click here".  The public still get to know what Trump is tweeting, but the they also get to know that the Twitter rules that apply to everyone else can also be applied to him.  As someone who has been booted off Twitter (for merely telling George Osborne to "fuck off and die") I don't consider these flags on two of Trump's personal tweets as "deplatforming".

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jose Jones said:

I was just watching ET with the kids actually. Back from when America actually was great!

https://www.google.com/maps/place/7121+Lonzo+St,+Tujunga,+CA+91042,+USA/@34.2706871,-118.2881993,147m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x80c2eca55ea245b5:0xb7cc65acb8ac9e6d!8m2!3d34.27088!4d-118.287408

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Do the "some" who said it include Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Daphne off Eggheads, etc?

 

Hitler was voted for, so I suspect he was happy enough with voting and populism initially.

 

No, I was thinking more along the lines of "intellectual" social commentators... who see people like Boris Johnson, Trump, George W. Bush, Tony Blair etc elected... and contemplate.

 

I'm happy enough with democracy... trouble is, you have to take the good with the bad.

 

Mostly bad.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Like I said, the tweet was from his personal account, not the POTUS account.  Also, they didn't take it down; they put the equivalent of NSFW tags on it: "this tweet contravenes our policies, but if you want to see it, click here".  The public still get to know what Trump is tweeting, but the they also get to know that the Twitter rules that apply to everyone else can also be applied to him.  As someone who has been booted off Twitter (for merely telling George Osborne to "fuck off and die") I don't consider these flags on two of Trump's personal tweets as "deplatforming".

 

Are his POTUS tweets more Lincolnian or Kennedian than his grimy personal account ones?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Like I said, the tweet was from his personal account, not the POTUS account.  Also, they didn't take it down; they put the equivalent of NSFW tags on it: "this tweet contravenes our policies, but if you want to see it, click here".  The public still get to know what Trump is tweeting, but the they also get to know that the Twitter rules that apply to everyone else can also be applied to him.  As someone who has been booted off Twitter (for merely telling George Osborne to "fuck off and die") I don't consider these flags on two of Trump's personal tweets as "deplatforming".


Yeah, but it would require a considerable level of political naivety to believe they were tagging all tweets that needed tagging that day and someone said, oh, look this one's from Trump.

 

I think they should not meddle. The user should remain responsible for the content, otherwise you open a can of worms, which Trump's executive order is now contributing towards.

 

And I wouldn't ban you for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jose Jones said:

Awesome! Still looks the same too, although maybe a new swimming pool.

Boss isn't it. Imagine living there! Yeah the pool wasn't in the film. Shame really. 

 

I lose myself for ages on Google maps. I "drove" from that house into Central LA on there once. Took me about an hour. Worth it though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Boss isn't it. Imagine living there! Yeah the pool wasn't in the film. Shame really. 

 

I lose myself for ages on Google maps. I "drove" from that house into Central LA on there once. Took me about an hour. Worth it though. 

Yes, traffic is always bad in LA.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

The irony of the fella who has abused social media the most - and gained the most from that abuse - now trying this fuckwittery is very bigly.

 

Not to mention, biting the hand that has fed his impropriety in a sumptuous and princely fashion.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, SasaS said:


Yeah, but it would require a considerable level of political naivety to believe they were tagging all tweets that needed tagging that day and someone said, oh, look this one's from Trump.

 

I think they should not meddle. The user should remain responsible for the content, otherwise you open a can of worms, which Trump's executive order is now contributing towards.

 

And I wouldn't ban you for that.

It's a bit of a leap to claim he's being deplatformed when, through all his years of hateful bullshit, he has never had a single tweet removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

It's a bit of a leap to claim he's being deplatformed when, through all his years of hateful bullshit, he has never had a single tweet removed.

True, but if you consider the importance of the channel for him and see this as a potential start of the process, it is not such a (beep) giant leap, more of a (beep) small step.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do genuinely wonder what it'd take for Mich McConnell or the Secret Service or Pence or whoever to walk into the Oval Office and remove him, like if he was looking for the nuclear briefcase in a packet of Monster Munch and was sat there naked with shit all over his face would anyone in that entire administration do anything about it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's all bluster.   Most American presidents have been able to start wars for profit, rape foreign lands, aid Israel and basically do as they please.   Some of them like Obama are able to do this whilst maintaining a good guy image. 

 

This cunt has basically just spoke shit on twitter non stop. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...