Frank Lampard

[dirty_sanchez]

"Totally Frank" - says it all

 

[Joe Strummer]

Good article from the Times.

 

"The man who always divides opinion in two

At the mercy of the England boo brigade and phone-in cynics, Frank Lampard hits back in typically full-blooded fashionMartin Samuel, Chief football correspondent

It would be very easy for Frank Lampard to pull out of this week’s England international with Germany. He, too, has a broken toe. He displays it, protruding through the end of his sandals, purple and swollen like an angry chipolata. The tendon is ruptured and, by rights, needs reconstructive surgery, but the club are reluctant as the lay-off would then be measured in weeks, maybe months. He bends the toes on his left foot to show the problem and the fourth one (the one that had no roast beef, if you recall the nursery rhyme) does not move. If a tendon stays unconnected after several weeks, the condition becomes irreparable; in time, the swelling and discomfort will ease, but the lack of movement will be permanent.

 

“I’ll be stuck with it, yeah,” Lampard says. “I don’t mind. The physio and the doctor have warned me that if I don’t rest, it will take three or four months to get better and I’ll have pain, and they said it would be better if I didn’t go with England. I thought about that. But, number one, I want to play for England, and number two, what is the point of resting it for a few days? It needs weeks and I won’t get that, so get on with it. That has always been my attitude. It comes from my dad [Frank Sr].

 

“When I was young, if I said to him: ‘My leg hurts’, his response would always be: ‘Get on with it.’ I’ve gone through life with that voice in my head. ‘Dad, I’ve broken my leg.’ ‘Get on with it.’ It’s an old-fashioned attitude, I know, but we could do with more of it these days. That is how I would be if I had a boy. Toughen him up. You watch, I’ll end up with a fanny merchant, driving me mad, always rolling about on the floor.” He mentions the name of a teammate, and laughs.

 

The irony is that a section of England fans would be only too happy if Lampard ducked it on Wednesday. Voted England player of the year by supporters in 2004 and 2005, the withdrawal of public affection has been swift and spectacular. At Wembley last May, while the announcement of David Beckham’s recall was cheered to the rafters, Lampard was booed and excellent, unselfish performances against Brazil and Estonia have done little to consolidate opinion in his favour. He remains the most divisive player in English football, provoking a dichotomy of extremes: either first on the teamsheet or not in the squad. There seems no third way at all.

 

Related Links

Chelsea put pressure on referee - Gerrard

“Playing for England can be tough,” he muses. “I’ve worked bloody hard to get here, so of course criticism hurts, but you can’t be weak enough to let it bother you. I could pull out of this game if I wanted. Say I’ve got a dodgy toe. But I will never hide. I can suffer getting booed. I’m not stupid. If we play crap, I don’t go around asking: ‘Why are they booing us?’ But putting myself in the position of the level-headed fan, it makes no sense to turn so quickly on one player. I take strength from the fact there have always been bad times with England and other players came through it.

 

“John Barnes got booed. John Barnes! Every player I’ve met who knew him says he was the best they ever played with. Alan Shearer had it before Euro 96, I remember. That is when you need big personalities. Maybe there will be a day when I say, ‘No more, because I need to focus my energy on my club’, but not soon, and certainly not because of a few boos.”

 

This disparity has followed him since his days at Upton Park, where half the crowd wanted him elevated to the England team and the other half would not have had him in the West Ham team (although it is the latter half that has scarred his memory.) “Look, everyone has a player that is not their favourite,” Lampard adds. “but I don’t know why it is particularly me. Maybe when I retire people will say: ‘He was a good player after all.’ Maybe when the goals aren’t there.

 

“In the street, people are always really nice to me, but I am aware of the other side. Perhaps the ones I think are nice walk away and say to their mates: ‘What a c***.’ He’s getting it now, John Terry. Every day he shows me a letter about his new contract: ‘F***ing 130 grand a week, I’m a builder, I hope you lose 10-0, you and your mate Lampard. . .’ They say horrible things, some of them. I wonder why people are like it. Who takes the time to write a letter like that? I got one last year from a Spurs fan, he said I took a corner – and I do remember it because I was getting slated by their lot – and I looked at them and smiled and he said it was antiSemitic, the way I looked at them. Incredible. I felt like writing back and saying: ‘I’m not antiSemitic – if I was, I’m hardly likely to announce it in front of 30,000 at White Hart Lane, of all places.’

 

“Things have changed. There is this phone-in culture now which encourages people to say strong things and I’ve probably picked up some enemies on the way. I play at Chelsea, which is a club that it is fashionable to dislike. I left West Ham in a bad way. The ‘Fat Frank’ thing started at West Ham and now it is everywhere. I did the fat test the other day. Mine is 8 per cent, which puts me among the three lowest players at the club. Then I go away and it’s ‘Fat Frank’.”

 

True story. Footballer of the Year dinner, Lancaster Gate, 2004. Lampard has been crowned the player of the season and has given, by overwhelming consent, the finest acceptance speech of any recipient in history, sincere and eloquent, for what must have been 20 minutes. Chelsea are champions – “we pissed the league that year,” he recalls, less eloquently, it must be said — and his goals have put them there. It is, unquestionably, his night and he is milking it to the last drop, staying up late for a well-earned celebration. Walking through the now half-empty hall, still clutching his trophy, he passes a group of men talking. All offer congratulations. Among the number is the comedian Alan Davies, a top bloke, and then a sports columnist for The Times. On seeing him, Lampard stops. “You,” he says, sounding not unlike a young Michael Caine, “called me a fat, Cockney twat.” All attempts to explain the nature of comedy prove useless. A small, one-sided argument ensues, the element of surprise being all in these cases. Even on his night of triumph, Lampard would not let it lie. You’ve got to like a guy who cares that much.

 

“I remember it,” he says. “If someone writes I played crap, I’m not going to go looking for them, but what he said was different. I remember reading it and thinking: ‘F***ing Jonathan Creek, who does he f***ing think he is?’ That’s how I am, and maybe it is a fault because I’d be better off keeping my nut down and keeping out of it. But I’ll say that to Alan Davies and then we’ll either get on or we won’t. A guy wrote that I spent more time shopping than training. I’ll react to that because I take pride in my training. I used to get very bitter about the treatment I received at West Ham, but I’m over that now. My first question after Chelsea games was: ‘How did West Ham get on?’ and not for the right reasons. It was a poxy feeling to have. It doesn’t help anyone. I love playing at West Ham now. I love the challenge. I’ve gone away, kicked on massively and now I can go back, hold my head up high and say: ‘Bollocks.’ ” Injuries and absenteeism in England’s midfield have postponed the decision, but when everybody is fit, Steve McClaren, the England head coach, has a tough call to make if he sees Lampard, Steven Gerrard and Owen Hargreaves competing for two places.

 

Against Andorra, when Lampard was left out because of injury according to McClaren, the grapevine buzzed with talk that he had been dropped and had reacted badly, demanding to leave the camp. He denies this, saying that Chelsea wanted him home for treatment, McClaren wished him to stay and the matter was resolved, manager to manager, by text. Even so, the suspicion remains that Gerrard’s international star is on the ascendant and McClaren may prefer Hargreaves as the workhorse; were that the case, what would Lampard do?

 

“I want to play and I believe I should play,” he says. “But if I don’t get picked, I’m not going to act the superstar. I’ve heard all the crap about wanting to get a private plane home before Andorra, but it was Chelsea that wanted me back. I respect the manager has to make the decision and if it gets to the stage where I’m not playing, I might ask about it, but I won’t cause a problem.

 

“People say England players don’t care — believe me, we care. We hate the fact that we look around the dressing-room and see all these great players — Steven Gerrard, John Terry, Wayne Rooney and we’re not winning or playing as fluently as we— should. But with England there is always light at the end of the tunnel because if you win something, that is you for life — part of history. That is what drives you on.”

 

It may never happen. But if it does, if this maligned England team does kick on massively, to coin a phrase, its most maligned player will have every right to go back to Wembley, take his seat in the Royal Box, hold his head up high and say . . .

 

Bollocks."

[DJLJ]

Against Andorra, when Lampard was left out because of injury according to McClaren, the grapevine buzzed with talk that he had been dropped and had reacted badly, demanding to leave the camp. He denies this, saying that Chelsea wanted him home for treatment, McClaren wished him to stay and the matter was resolved, manager to manager, by text. Even so, the suspicion remains that Gerrard’s international star is on the ascendant and McClaren may prefer Hargreaves as the workhorse; were that the case, what would Lampard do?

 

 

A sign of the times. Whether an international footballer is going or staying is now being resolved by text. ARGHHHHH

[MLB]

He really is a cunt. He was complete dogshit yesterday and then celebrated his penalty like his was some kind of big time match-winner. Prick.

[George Costanza]

He's a fat fucking ginsters eating moonface

[rebel23]

Chelsea fans must be so proud...

 

is he still running down his contract?

[dave u]

Lampard only does interviews with Samuel because it makes him feel slim.

[RedKnight]

I heard Lampard just had a hundred lb mole removed from his ass.

[James Dean]

Also tried to break Alonsos legs again yesterday the fat snidey fucker.

[Aaron Miller]

frank lampard: the man without a taint.

[Joe Strummer]

I hate everything about him. This is a quote from his autobiography after he had spent time on Abramovich's yacht..

 

"I suppose people imagine that as a Premiership footballer, my life is quite special," he hazards. "I would agree, but those two weeks opened my eyes to another world."

 

Horrible out of touch deluded overated fat cunt.

[dirty_sanchez]

I heard Lampard just had a hundred lb mole removed from his ass.

 

I heard a similar story about Richard Gere.

[The Chief]

Remember last season when that Spurs fan ran on the pitch to get him? Fuck that was hilarious, he fucking shit himself and ran away, the look of sheer terror on his face was a joy to behold! Then the steward got him and Drogba threw a snidey punch, and bg fat Fwank go all brave again. the fucking fat food hoover.

[Victor Ganges]

I heard Lampard just had a hundred lb mole removed from his ass.

Any mole wolud have trouble digging it's own way out of there.

[bobhorse]

Fat unbendytoe'd cunt

[Sut]

I like the bit in that interview where he's trying to justify his not being fat.

 

"The ‘Fat Frank’ thing started at West Ham and now it is everywhere. I did the fat test the other day. Mine is 8 per cent, which puts me among the three lowest players at the club. Then I go away and it’s ‘Fat Frank’. Please, please make the nasty boys stop calling me that. Mum says I'm just big-boned."

 

I think the [fat] lady doth protest too much.

[G Richards]

A decent player who nevertheless should be on the bench for England. The central pairing needs to be Gerrard and Hargreaves all day long. Hargreaves becasue he is disciplined, athletic, neat and tidy and tenacious in the tackle, and Gerrard because he is the best midfielder in the country.

 

If Stevie is injured or horribly out of form, then, and only then, should Lampard be considered. It is a great shame no England manager has had the courage to say what is obvious.

 

As for Lampard's celebration, it really got under my skin, but then, I can't really blame him. It was a truly 'get out of jail' moment for them, and the relief must have been enormous. He was outclassed by Stevie the whole game. While the opportunity to score from the spot would have been an unexpected bonus, the reality of where he stands in relation to Gerrard could not be avoided on Sunday.

[RedBrian84]

A decent player who nevertheless should be on the bench for England. The central pairing needs to be Gerrard and Hargreaves all day long. Hargreaves becasue he is disciplined, athletic, neat and tidy and tenacious in the tackle, and Gerrard because he is the best midfielder in the country.

 

If Stevie is injured or horribly out of form, then, and only then, should Lampard be considered. It is a great shame no England manager has had the courage to say what is obvious.

 

As for Lampard's celebration, it really got under my skin, but then, I can't really blame him. It was a truly 'get out of jail' moment for them, and the relief must have been enormous. He was outclassed by Stevie the whole game. While the opportunity to score from the spot would have been an unexpected bonus, the reality of where he stands in relation to Gerrard could not be avoided on Sunday.

 

Hargreaves is shite.

[TommyW]

did Chelsea win the league in 2004?

 

regardless, that interview is a horrible insight into the modern footballer, it'd be best if most of them didnt try and prove how much like the working man they are and just stop giving interviews

 

similar to the Alan Davies incident, there was a rumour (might have been in fourfourtwo) that said that during the last world cup when any journalist suggested Gerrard was the better player or that Lampard should be dropped he called them personally to have it out with them... during the tournament!

 

twat, twat, twat

[G Richards]

Hargreaves is shite.

 

Disagree. Obviously not in Stevie's class, but I would say he is the best midfielder to form a cerntral partnership with Stevie. (English of course. Macher or Alonso are better).

[Paco]

fuckin supergoals cunt

[silverlining]

Hargreaves is shite.

 

 

No he fucking isn't.

 

He was ace in the World Cup, and shite players don't win four titles, one Champions League and stay 10 years at a club like Bayern.

 

He's disciplined, fast, a decent tackler and a OK passer.

 

Not sure I'd take him over Masher, but there aren't many DMs I would take over Masher.

[WeAreTheBest]

 

He was ace in the World Cup

 

He was great against Portugal, thats it. He was ok against Sweden and alright at right back against Ecuador. The "he was amazing for England at the World Cup" is annoying as the "Hargreaves is useless and shouldnt be in the squad" before it.

[Red Mist]

He isn't shite but he's not that great either. He's only a marginal improvement on Fletcher. Basically the same as Carrick.

[Paul]

I really like Hargreaves. He's a very experienced defensive midfielder at the highest level who rarely loses possession, is lightening fast and can run seemingly flat out for the entire 90 minutes.