Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

Comparison of Israel to the Nazis?

 

Sue the cunt.

People either want the IHRA definition adopting or they don't. It appears that people want a "have your cake and eat it" approach.

 

The IHRA definition is arguably a quasi-legal document. So, what rules of interpretation should be adopted? Given the potential seriousness of allegations of antisemitism, the IHRA should be interpreted literally.

 

The document states that it may be antisemitism if:

 

"Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis."

 

This is clearly meant to mean saying stuff like "they're worse/as bad as the Nazis, them" etc. Corbyn does no such thing. He discusses the conditions of people living under occupation in Gaza etc and relates them to other people living under occupation by other nations. He doesn't mention Nazis at all. Didn't Japan, Italy and Russia occupy places in the second world war?

 

This complete bending of the meaning of "antisemitism" to fit is pathetic. It now appears to have gone even further than trying to class legitimate criticism of Israel as antisemitic to also trying to include sympathising with Palestinian people and making illustrative comparisons of the suffering they're subjected to.

 

These IHRA examples must now be resisted, no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Booooom!

 

 

 

Jeremy Corbyn

 

@jeremycorbyn

 

·

 

8m

 

Israeli PM @Netanyahu's claims about my actions and words are false. What deserves unequivocal condemnation is the killing of over 160 Palestinian protesters in Gaza by Israeli forces since March, including dozens of children.

He's doubling down on sweetlips
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cute bit of "journalism" that.

 

Israel's secret service is accused of assassinating those behind the 1972 siege. The PLO's liaison officer with foreign inteligence agencies, Atef Bseiso, was killed in Paris in 1992.

 

They don't actually say that Bseiso was in any way involved in the Munich Siege.  (According to Wikipedia, there's only the Israeli military intelligence who claim that; the PLO denied it.)  But by putting those two sentences side by side, they give an impression that confirms that Corbyn loves a good ol' bit of terrorism - he can't get enough! - while leaving themselves just enough legal wriggle-room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's pick nationalising the railway for one. Will end up with even worse punctuality than there is now and poorer choice. People forget how shit things were under British Rail.

 

British Rail became shite due to deliberate underfunding by the Tories prior to being "saved" by privatisation. See the NHS for a more contemporary example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who bemoan nationalisation conveniently forget many of these companies are state owned, just not by our state. Arriva for example is owned by the German government.

 

Every time you find yourself with your face in someone's armpit on a train you're probably paying for some Canadian teacher's pension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stolen from Twitter:

 

If you look at what current Labour backbenchers have achieved, on FOBTS, loan sharks, children's funeral fees and more, they effected change that helped people. I can't see Corbyn ever did. He just voted against his own side, usually with the Tories.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stolen from Twitter:

 

If you look at what current Labour backbenchers have achieved, on FOBTS, loan sharks, children's funeral fees and more, they effected change that helped people. I can't see Corbyn ever did. He just voted against his own side, usually with the Tories.

You seem to be trying to make a point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man, that’s poor. You know it’s poor too.

It was an attempt to illustrate the importance of actually posting what you mean.

 

Not one piece of legislation but loads of foreign trips.

Again, you seem to be trying to make a point without wanting to say what your opinion is. It feels like you don't want to lock yourself in to an opinion. SD does it too. Implications abd insinuations aren't useful. There's way too much room for misunderstanding.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was an attempt to illustrate the importance of actually posting what you mean.

 

Again, you seem to be trying to make a point without wanting to say what your opinion is. It feels like you don't want to lock yourself in to an opinion. SD does it too. Implications abd insinuations aren't useful. There's way too much room for misunderstanding.

What a load of fucking tosh. It’s you, once again, trying to make yourself look clever.

 

Man of the people Corbyn changed fucking nothing for the people he was representing. Ever. Now, if he’d been an MP solely worried about his constituents perhaps that’s forgivable, but we know that’s not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stolen from Twitter:

 

If you look at what current Labour backbenchers have achieved, on FOBTS, loan sharks, children's funeral fees and more, they effected change that helped people. I can't see Corbyn ever did. He just voted against his own side, usually with the Tories.

 

And Corbyn voted against all of those bills ? I am disgusted if he did.

 

Your posts used to be interesting on this thread, Rico , as an alternative view to our mainly Corbyn-love  , but you seem to have gone a bit manic recently , sub-Daily Mail stuff.

 

On the Cemetery shit , all of the suspected Munich terrorists' graves have now been revealed and not a single one of them is buried in the graveyard in question , the Arabic inscription on the wreath relates to an Israeli atrocity which was condemned unanimously by the United Nations ( Including Thatcher ) the picture appears to have been photoshopped and Netanyahu is a cunt. Not necessarily in that order.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man of the people Corbyn changed fucking nothing for the people he was representing. Ever. Now, if he’d been an MP solely worried about his constituents perhaps that’s forgivable, but we know that’s not the case.

He's MP for Islington and his website has more mentions of Israel than it does Islington. Read into that what you will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...