Tottenham at Anfield, February 4th 2018

[torahboy]

Graham Poll if I remember right. Cannot remember the game though.

 

 

Mike Reed. A game against Leeds when he played an advantage and, I think, Murphy scored. They are really such insignificant people with such low self=esteem that they actually celebrate when they do something right in their life. THe cunt linesman yesterday took such behavioural anomaly to the realms of insanity because he actualy celebrated getting things wrong.

[sir roger]

Mike Reed. A game against Leeds when he played an advantage and, I think, Murphy scored. They are really such insignificant people with such low self=esteem that they actually celebrate when they do something right in their life. THe cunt linesman yesterday took such behavioural anomaly to the realms of insanity because he actualy celebrated getting things wrong.

 

Trrriffffic. Now run around.

[deiseach]

BBC pundits are a disgrace, no mention at all of Kane diving. They just fixated on the offside issue. Can't have the integrity of England's golden boy called into question, oh no.

 

I'm trying, and mostly succeeding, to not get het up over yesterday. We'd all be chucking not-very-quietly if Liverpool had benefited from those decisions. But when you see Harry Kane claiming that Van Dijk "just wiped [Lamela] out" and not get called out for being a bare-faced liar . . . unless proven otherwise, it's safe to assume that someone working in the media is below a cockroach in the evolutionary ladder.

[sir roger]

If VAR had been working at Anfield yesterday we would all still be there.

[deiseach]

Mike Reed. A game against Leeds when he played an advantage and, I think, Murphy scored. They are really such insignificant people with such low self=esteem that they actually celebrate when they do something right in their life. THe cunt linesman yesterday took such behavioural anomaly to the realms of insanity because he actualy celebrated getting things wrong.

 

He was 'severely reprimanded' over that. Like he gave a shit. 

[sh#t waffle]

I'm not saying he's biased but I do think it needs looking at.

 

I think that assistant will be quietly spoken to by his superiors about what the fuck he was up to with that gesture. 

Hadn't even seen that until now - it's fucking weird, and though it may sound harsh I think he should probably be killed. 

[torahboy]

Trrriffffic. Now run around.

What the fuck are you drivelling about?

[sir roger]

What the fuck are you drivelling about?

 

You're probably too young to remember Mike Reid & certainly over-aggressive.

[torahboy]

You're probably too young to remember Mike Reid & certainly over-aggressive.

 

 

 

How well you know me.

[deiseach]

You're probably too young to remember Mike Reid & certainly over-aggressive.

 

Chevy Chase didn't think much of him either.

[dockers_strike]

Mike Reed. A game against Leeds when he played an advantage and, I think, Murphy scored. They are really such insignificant people with such low self=esteem that they actually celebrate when they do something right in their life. THe cunt linesman yesterday took such behavioural anomaly to the realms of insanity because he actualy celebrated getting things wrong.

 

No one Im thinking is Poll at Anfield. Remember the people behind me saying did you see the ref fist pump that goal.

[Jockey]

I'm still struggling to understand how the linesman stating that 'If' Lovren touched it - it would be onside, if not it is offside - only for Moss to then say 'I have no idea' 

 

Then

 

'I'm going to give the pen'!

 

How does that work? I don't know what happened so i will give it. 

[Anubis]

Always did like Clatters.....

 

https://www.101greatgoals.com/news/clattenburg-tottenham-liverpool-offside/

[The Golden Eel]

I'm still struggling to understand how the linesman stating that 'If' Lovren touched it - it would be onside, if not it is offside - only for Moss to then say 'I have no idea' 

 

Then

 

'I'm going to give the pen'!

 

How does that work? I don't know what happened so i will give it. 

 

It's because he'd already given it, I would imagine. Easier to stick with the decision than change it. The linesman didn't give him a definite steer that he should not give it. I'm not saying that's right by the way, just what I think went through his head at that moment.

[chacha shakoor]

I'd say both penalties weren't penalties because they were offside. I still can't see the VVD kick as a foul even though it looked like a foul in real time. It looks to me as if he brushes him and Lamela throws himself backwards, if he kicked him what kind of motion is that to fall. Regardless of that Lamela was offside and so was Kane. I think even though Kane jumped over Karius that's still a penalty because he's impeding him, he could have just dragged his foot down a bit and created contact.

[Ranxerox]

Not arsed. It happened in one of our games in the 80's. The ref allowed play-on from a bad tackle, and we scored. He fist pumped. He was accused of bias. He explained that it was because he made the right call and from which a goal ensued. I accepted it. It's a bit shit but not worth getting your knickers in a twist over.

This reminds me of a personal experience.

 

I was coaching my son's U16 team 2 summers ago and the ref played advantage and we ended up scoring as a result. The foul that led to the advantage was a nasty deliberate kick that nearly took my players leg off and left him injured. As we were getting ready to restart I called out to ask why there was no yellow. The ref came storming over screaming at me that I was ungrateful and had some nerve complaining after he had "just given us a goal".

[Denny Crane]

Surprised more people didn't pick up on the "TV comments". 

 

Sounds like they are covering up here. Asking about what he has from TV is a breach of the rules. Award a 3-0 home win to us and suspend Manc Riley.

 

 

 

[an tha]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42943628

[Lee909]

So whats a player supposed to do know. Leave the ball and hope the player is flagged. Its play to the fucking whistle. He has to try and play the ball or Kanes in

 

Beck pedalling and arse covering all tbe refs and FA are good for

[John101]

So he knew the Liverpool player played it, was in a good position to see it and also saw the foul on Kane.

 

What was that whole episode on the sideline all about then?

 

They must read these forums and realise some Liverpool fans will accept any old excuse.

[Johnlj]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42943628

What an absolute joke of a statement. 

[sir roger]

Blatant lies , would expect no less from PGMOL

[Pureblood]

Moss was seen on camera asking Atkinson if there was "anything from TV" showing if Lovren had touched the ball, before sticking to his decision without receiving a response.

 

I can't accept this bit.  What did Atkinson do, blank him?  How do we know he didn't receive a response?  He had a headset on.

[Moo]

Blatant lies , would expect no less from PGMOL

Terrible isn't it? Blatant bullshit, nothing, not a single word or gesture in the exchange indicated Moss knew it came off a Liverpool player but he just didn't know which one.

Really this should make matters even worse for the officials but that depends if anyone takes up the baton and runs with it. More realistically it'll probably be accepted and the story allowed to die.

[Pureblood]

I think we should write to the authorities and request an explanation as to why Jon Moss was allowed to confer with Martin Atkinson in the absence of VAR, and ask for cast-iron proof that no information was relayed from Atkinson to Moss.  If that makes me sound small-time, I don't care.   The more information that emerges about this the angrier it makes me.