Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

BBC News - Prisoners serving less than four years to get vote

 

The government has announced that prisoners serving less than four years will be eligible to vote.

 

But the Cabinet Office statement said all offenders sentenced to four years or more would automatically be barred from registering to vote.

 

The decision comes after a European court ruling which the government is obliged to implement.

 

Meanwhile a man serving life for raping and murdering a seven-year-old niece lost an appeal over his right to vote.

 

Under the changes, the sentencing judge will be able to remove the right to vote from some prisoners sentenced to less than four years.

 

Mark Harper, Minister for political and constitutional reform, said proposal was "not a choice, it is a legal obligation".

 

"We are ensuring the most serious offenders will continue to be barred from voting.

 

"If the government failed to implement this judgement, we would not only be in breach of our international obligations but could be risking taxpayers' money in paying out compensation claims," he said.

 

Five years ago, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled the UK's long-standing voting ban was unlawful.

 

Anyone fancy starting a new party? Sky TV in cells and phones up the arse for all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmm, I personally don't think shitbags should have any say in issues which affect my life, not until they've paid their dues and earned that right again.

 

 

Well tough, the European Court of Human Rights says they should, and I am inclined to agree. Prisoners are people too. Anyone who is remotely interested in rehabilitation of offenders ought to support measures like this that allow transgressors to continue to play a role in civic society. The last thing prisoners need is to be dehumanised further than they already are.

 

You are definitely in the majority on this though, LabCon oppose votes for prisoners and fought this ECHR ruling tooth and nail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest davelfc

Prisons, what a joke, you should be punished and earn the right to get rehabilitation. If you get 3 years that's what you serve, good behaviour means you don't serve any longer.

 

Split the sentence in two, half punishment and half rehabilitation. I don't agree you should have the vote, you gave up a lot of your rights when you fucked up and got caught.

 

We need improved prisons, more of them and better trained staff. But my mate is a prison officer and they're just cutting and cutting. If I heard him right last week he said a new officer earns less now than what he earned as a new officer 18 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ShoePiss
Well tough, the European Court of Human Rights says they should, and I am inclined to agree. Prisoners are people too. Anyone who is remotely interested in rehabilitation of offenders ought to support measures like this that allow transgressors to continue to play a role in civic society. The last thing prisoners need is to be dehumanised further than they already are.

 

You are definitely in the majority on this though, LabCon oppose votes for prisoners and fought this ECHR ruling tooth and nail.

 

I don't understand why they should have a role to play in civic society when their punishment (that they were well aware of in most cases) is to be taken out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, I personally don't think shitbags should have any say in issues which affect my life, not until they've paid their dues and earned that right again.

You get sent to jail you you can't vote; not hard really is it? Well, not in any sane society anyway, although Christ knows that's long ceased to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco
Is the main reason the MP's are objecting because its Europe telling them what to do or do they really feel passionately about prisoner rights?

 

FWIW I'm very slightly inclined to agree prisoners should have the vote, but I'm not really arsed either way.

 

I feel more passionately about 16 year olds getting the right to vote. Even if it's only the ones who are working. To contribute money to society but not be able to vote is fucking ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I feel more passionately about 16 year olds getting the right to vote. Even if it's only the ones who are working. To contribute money to society but not be able to vote is fucking ridiculous.

 

Problem being 16 year olds are more likely to vote against the con-dems after the university lies and deceit. Chuck their fellow criminals the chance to vote With a few sweetners to secure they vote in the right direction and they've managed to clawback some of the votes they've lost by being self protecting, stealling, conning corrupt politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just the idea that they should forfeit this right when they go to prison which is the issue for me, it's the fact they're a group of people who've got no vested interest in selecting a Government anyway, unless that Government has got particular prison policies which they're likely to vote for (a worrying prospect to be sure). Let's say you're in prison for the next three and a half years, why would you use that vote with any real conviction? You're more than likely just going to take the piss with it. Lunacy.

 

How will it work with council elections? Will they vote for their home council or the authority where their prison is based? Could we then see a prison full of convicted criminals having a disproportionately large say in who gets voted onto that council?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

It's just wrong on so many accounts as Section has explained. How can someone doing bird vote with any conviction. Just another daft idea rolled out by the European/UK human rights job worthies to add to a list that grows longer by the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should get the Republicans involved in the implementation of this; they've got previous of being really efficient when it comes to managing databases of former felons.

 

And by "managing" I mean fraudulently fiddling them to steal elections.

 

 

Some states in the US ban felons from voting even after they've been released. Crazy shit. They might as well reintroduce branding.

 

These laws banning prisoners or felons from voting are racist laws because ethnic minorities are over-represented in the prison system. They're a great way of preventing black people from having their say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...