The Bold Street Time Slips

[Fugitive]

2 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

Crime is different. You are an eye witness. If you are talking about time loops on Bold st eye witness is less important.

You dirty thick lying racist scumbag. 

[Clem H Fandango]

Just now, Poor Scouser T said:

Crime is different. You are an eye witness. If you are talking about time loops on Bold st eye witness is less important.

 

So, to sum up, your opinion that observational evidence in a scientific field is bollocks. Yet other observational evidence is okay?

 

[RJ Fan club]

1 minute ago, TheHowieLama said:

What if you witnessed a crime on a time loop?

 

[Poor Scouser T]

4 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

You're a cunt.

Again call me that to my face. I'll be down in Feb, Bring your bird. She will enjoy me slapping like a bitch and making you cry.

[Poor Scouser T]

Just now, Poor Scouser T said:

.

 

[Fugitive]

Just now, Poor Scouser T said:

 

You’ve just quoted yourself, you thick twat. What a fucking scumbag you are.

[Poor Scouser T]

5 minutes ago, Clem H Fandango said:

 

So, to sum up, your opinion that observational evidence in a scientific field is bollocks. Yet other observational evidence is okay?

 

Where did i say that?

In all data observational data is the least reliable. It has no control and is completely subjective. It cannot be used in any reliable study.

[Fugitive]

2 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

Where did i say that?

In all data observational data is the least reliable. It has no control and is completely subjective. It cannot be used in any reliable study.

Nonce

[Poor Scouser T]

16 minutes ago, Fugitive said:

Nonce

I've gone beyond trying to being nice to you now and am going to beat the shit out of you.

[Clem H Fandango]

20 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

Where did i say that?

In all data observational data is the least reliable. It has no control and is completely subjective. It cannot be used in any reliable study.

 

So it is bollocks for crime then?

[Poor Scouser T]

Just now, Clem H Fandango said:

 

So it is bollocks for crime then?

Depends on the circumstances. Criminal it is beyond reasonable doubt. Civil it is likely. Dozens of circumstantial stuff ads up it all depends.

[Fugitive]

7 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

I've gone beyond trying to being nice to you now and am going to beat the shit out of you.

Are you going to track me down with an up address, you racist loon?

[Clem H Fandango]

3 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

Depends on the circumstances. Criminal it is beyond reasonable doubt. Civil it is likely. Dozens of circumstantial stuff ads up it all depends.

 

Haleys comet observed by people in 240bc was bollocks then until the 1700's when it was spotted with a telescope? explain that difference please, it is science based.

[Poor Scouser T]

5 minutes ago, Clem H Fandango said:

 

Haleys comet observed by people in 240bc was bollocks then until the 1700's when it was spotted with a telescope? explain that difference please, it is science based.

That is a fair point but it took 2000 years to verify and was a galactic event. If the Bold St thing is being discussed in 2000 years i'll hold my hands up.

[cloggypop]

3 hours ago, Kepler-186 said:

Have heard about Bold Street. 
 

On a slightly different tangent here’s the story about the ley line down Mathew Street.

 

http://www.thecornpoppy.com/2019/07/manhole-cover-at-centre-of-universe.html?m=1

 

“Well, this interstellar ley line is a mega-powered one. Too much power coming down it for it not to writhe about. The only three fixed points on earth it travels through are Iceland, Mathew Street in Liverpool and New Guinea. Wherever something creatively or spiritually mega happens anywhere else on earth, it is because this interstellar ley line is momentarily powering through the territory.”

 

More on this. 

 

Bill Drummond

 

'It comes careering in from outer space, hits the world in Iceland, bounces back up, writhing about like a conger eel, then down Mathew Street in Liverpool....Back up, twisting, turning, wriggling across the face of the earth until it reaches the uncharted mountains of New Guinea, where it shoots back into space. Deep space....This interstellar ley line is a mega-powered one. Too much power coming down it for it not to writhe about. The only three fixed points on earth it travels through are Iceland, Mathew Street in Liverpool and New Guinea. Wherever something creatively or spiritually mega happens anywhere else on earth, it is because this interstellar ley line is momentarily powering through the territory.'

 

https://peterchrisp.blogspot.com/2015/01/pulling-cosmic-trigger-part-2-cosmic.html?m=1#:~:text=He came to imagine that,Street in Liverpool....

[Clem H Fandango]

2 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

That is a fair point but it took 2000 years to verify and was a galactic event. If the Bold St thing is being discussed in 2000 years i'll hold my hands up.

 

But thousnads of eyewitness accounts v 1 eyeball in a telescope?

[Poor Scouser T]

Just now, Clem H Fandango said:

 

But thousnads of eyewitness accounts v 1 eyeball in a telescope?

Seriously?

[Clem H Fandango]

2 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

Seriously?

 

What? do you not see what im getting at?

 

1 eyeball in a telescope you believe.

 

1000's of eyewitnesses you dont believe.

[Poor Scouser T]

11 minutes ago, Clem H Fandango said:

 

What? do you not see what im getting at?

 

1 eyeball in a telescope you believe.

 

1000's of eyewitnesses you dont believe.

Do you honestly think it was just an eyeball? Not thousands of hours of maths and equations to prove a hypothesis?

[Clem H Fandango]

1 minute ago, Poor Scouser T said:

Do you honestly think it was just an eyeball? Not thousands of hours of maths and equations to prove a hypothesis?

 

Anyone coan conjure up a hypothesis on anything. You believe Stephen Hawkings wormhole theory without it being observed?

[Poor Scouser T]

You obviously do not understand the scientific method.

[Clem H Fandango]

1 minute ago, Poor Scouser T said:

You obviously do not understand the scientific method.

 

You stated observational evidence in science is not believable.

[Poor Scouser T]

Just now, Clem H Fandango said:

 

You stated observational evidence in science is not believable.

It is not. Alone.

Science is not a mystical thing it is about ruling out all possible explanations. Observations are top of the list, unless they have conclusive evidence.

[Clem H Fandango]

3 minutes ago, Poor Scouser T said:

It is not. Alone.

Science is not a mystical thing it is about ruling out all possible explanations. Observations are top of the list, unless they have conclusive evidence.

But in the case of haleys comet, observation came first which was then verified and then the maths/science, otherwise why would you put effort into the math without having witnessed.

[cloggypop]

Getting a flashback to Anny Road here