Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Nelly-Matip said:

Yes. I’m riled up. You got me. Grrrrr! 

You certainly seem flustered, yes. 

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

Chris Williamson wasn't it? (I may be wrong) 

Maybe, I was trying to find out who he was referring to before agreeing or disagreeing. If he meant Corbyn, then it’s not just semantics to point out he wasn’t. Though scoring tribal points is rarely about being accurate. I *think* Williamson was suspended for saying Labour he been too apologetic though I can’t really remember. If he was suspended for it, then fair comment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hank Moody said:

You certainly seem flustered, yes. 

Maybe, I was trying to find out who he was referring to before agreeing or disagreeing. If he meant Corbyn, then it’s not just semantics to point out he wasn’t. Though scoring tribal points is rarely about being accurate. I *think* Williamson was suspended for saying Labour he been too apologetic though I can’t really remember. If he was suspended for it, then fair comment. 

I’ll reply later when I’ve calmed down. Or something.*

 

*yawns 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hank Moody said:

 

Maybe, I was trying to find out who he was referring to before agreeing or disagreeing. If he meant Corbyn, then it’s not just semantics to point out he wasn’t. Though scoring tribal points is rarely about being accurate. I *think* Williamson was suspended for saying Labour he been too apologetic though I can’t really remember. If he was suspended for it, then fair comment. 

That rings more of a bell and I can't be arsed googling. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Anubis said:

There is something wryly amusing that a 73 year old, allotment and manhole cover loving vegan, who has spent his career advocating for fairness, equality and peace, is the Keyser Söze of British politics.

The whole corbyn anti semitism smear thing is the best example of say a lie often enough and it becomes 'fact"there Is.

I'd still like to know how exactly you can be a pacifist terrorist sympathiser. 

I wonder if starmer will know get a glimpse of what corbyn had to go through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nelly-Matip said:

Accusations of people weaponising antisemitism? Does anybody know when Margaret will be suspended and have the whip withdrawn from her? 
 

Consistency, kids…

Self awareness is not her strongest point I'm guessing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

The whole corbyn anti semitism smear thing is the best example of say a lie often enough and it becomes 'fact"there Is.

I'd still like to know how exactly you can be a pacifist terrorist sympathiser. 

I wonder if starmer will know get a glimpse of what corbyn had to go through.

Seems to have blown over to be honest. There’s just no legs in this. There were a lot of things that you could make a story out of with Corbyn, but this one is actually just silly. So they can trump it up once, but that’s it. With Corbyn they could keep going back and back and back to meetings or things he said or whatever. Individually they would have gone away, but to keep on going with it is what hurt Corbyn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hank Moody said:

Seems to have blown over to be honest. There’s just no legs in this. There were a lot of things that you could make a story out of with Corbyn, but this one is actually just silly. So they can trump it up once, but that’s it. With Corbyn they could keep going back and back and back to meetings or things he said or whatever. Individually they would have gone away, but to keep on going with it is what hurt Corbyn. 

I've seen people argue he is a bona fide nazi 

It was an a brilliant lesson on brainwashing..much better if it can be done with a thimble.

My guess is they will use something else to go after starmer with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

I've seen people argue he is a bona fide nazi 

It was an a brilliant lesson on brainwashing..much better if it can be done with a thimble.

My guess is they will use something else to go after starmer with.

Yeah, I don’t think it will be this. It’s just not something you can pin to Starmer. I think they’ll throw as much shit as they can to see what sticks. They had this Durham business for a while, now they’re looking for something else. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hank Moody said:

I read about five and had to stop at this one. He manages to be ignorant, idiotic, and a spiteful cunt all in one post.

 

Screenshot 2022-07-19 075950.png

I think that shows the uphill task Labour have got. 

Trying to get simpletons to vote for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Arniepie said:

I think that shows the uphill task Labour have got. 

Trying to get simpletons to vote for them.

Yeah, I think some are a lost cause. He'd not vote for Labour if Labour had a 'free blowjobs and money for Brads' policy. 'I can't support that type of socialism'. Okay Brad, back to bed. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hank Moody said:

Yeah, I think some are a lost cause. He'd not vote for Labour if Labour had a 'free blowjobs and money for Brads' policy. 'I can't support that type of socialism'. Okay Brad, back to bed. 

More foodbanks doesn't mean more poverty?

Just read that back.

The worrying thing for me is that you get this type of attitude from normal working people.

I can.understand it from lifelong Tories but this seems to be a common messege from red wall type voters.

I genuinely don't know how starmer even starts to address this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

More foodbanks doesn't mean more poverty?

Just read that back.

The worrying thing for me is that you get this type of attitude from normal working people.

I can.understand it from lifelong Tories but this seems to be a common messege from red wall type voters.

I genuinely don't know how starmer even starts to address this.

Yeah, it's daft. As if they're just opening more foodbanks for the fun of it an to serve the same amount of people. Sure thing, Brad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hank Moody said:

If anything, it makes him a bigger cunt. If such a thing is possible. 


Sums up Twitter to a tee. 
 

It’s exactly because of cunts like him I registered with Twitter about 10 years ago, have never posted a single thing and not logged in for 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...