Legal question

[Guest Ulysses Everett McGill]

Inspired by a pic in the mundane shit thread

 

Legally, what would happen if one of the two girls murdered someone?

 

Also, how the fuck would you prove it was one and not the other?

 

[Unrighteous]

They'd both get done for it, to be honest.

 

They should both have control over their limbs in a sense...

[Fugitive]

Inspired by a pic in the mundane shit thread

 

Legally, what would happen if one of the two girls murdered someone?

 

Also, how the fuck would you prove it was one and not the other?

 

 

Awww fucking hell.

 

I'm going to go to sleep tonight wondering would it be classed as a threesome or not if you shagged one/both of them.

[Fugitive]

If one wanted Sex and the other did not, would the one who never be able to do you for rape. Surely the other one saying yes would take away some responsibility.

 

I'm staying away from Siamese twins. It's a fucking minefield.

[Cosmos]

Two faced bitch.

[Unrighteous]

If one wanted Sex and the other did not, would the one who never be able to do you for rape. Surely the other one saying yes would take away some responsibility.

 

I'm staying away from Siamese twins. It's a fucking minefield.

 

If ONE of them says yes, then I reckon you can get away with the rape on the second...

 

I mean you didn't know which one you had to listen to and whatnot...

[Bubsa]

In British Law, at least, there are no such examples of the scenario given and, therefore, should it arrive, the legal baseline for such a circumstance would rely on a Judge and/or jury. Until then, it's a legal anomaly.

 

If you cast your mind back to 2000, the European Court of Appeal had a significant landmark regarding Siamese twins and the law. The two twins were conjoined at the hip and doctors said they should be separated, or both would face certain death, however, in doing so, one of the twins would definately die. The parents did not want to go ahead, but, in the laws of ethics, the judgement had to be made.

 

This is about as close as we've come to the example of the thread. British Law is unique, and arguabaly flawed, in that it isn't bound by a written constitution, as with American Law, to act as a baseline. For example, little Johnny steals an apple to feed his starving son and is prosecuted successfully. That is the baseline. however, a judge, albeit very difficultly, rule that little Timmy, who did the same, would be innocent of theft - that then becomes the new baseline. This is a horrendously simplified version of the law, I concede, but it serves an example.

 

In relation to this thread, especially over such a contentious issue, I'd imagine in British Law it would really depend on what kind of Judge the twins are dealing with!

[philyhamann]

If I was a siamese twin I'd become a comic book villain but irl then if someone ever caught me, my twin would claim innocence.

[melons]

Does she give heads?

 

i was wondering the type of suck treat they would have on offer, given one doesnt want the view, the proximity would make it very difficult. If the other was happy to join in then jobs a good un?

 

Didnt those ones joined at the head admit to not being virgins?

 

You'd also be fucked if one wanted to commit suicide by swallowing a few boxes of pills.

[Guest Ulysses Everett McGill]

i was wondering the type of suck treat they would have on offer, given one doesnt want the view, the proximity would make it very difficult. If the other was happy to join in then jobs a good un?

 

Didnt those ones joined at the head admit to not being virgins?

 

You'd also be fucked if one wanted to commit suicide by swallowing a few boxes of pills.

 

Can Twin A feel Twin B's if Twin A started punching herself in the face?

 

Or would Twin A have to hook around and achieve impact on the face of Twin B?

[Unrighteous]

Can Twin A feel Twin B's if Twin A started punching herself in the face?

 

Or would Twin A have to hook around and achieve impact on the face of Twin B?

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

Funniest mental picture. Ever.