Havant and Waterlooville or Swansea?

[Randy Marsh]

THE MIGHTY SALIF HAS JUST COME ON FOR STOKE!!!

[hamstrung]

THE MIGHTY SALIF HAS JUST COME ON FOR STOKE!!!

 

We're playing H & W then...

 

*edit: note to self. Red Wine on a school night may result in fuckwitedness.*

[Elite]

We're playing H & W then...

 

Why Cos Salif is playing in a different match?

[hamstrung]

Why Cos Salif is playing in a different match?

 

In my defence, I have been drinking heavily.

 

I understand Newcastle have scored again since his arrival, so the underlying point was correct.

[RedinSweden]

I mean, havants no. 10 is Rocky Baptiste. That is Jossy's Giantstastic.

[philyhamann]

I've never thought of it before, but is "isn't it" correct as far as grammar goes? I mean, does it not mean "is not it"?

[hamstrung]

I've never thought of it before, but is "isn't it" correct as far as grammar goes? I mean, does it not mean "is not it"?

 

doesn't it?

[Randy Marsh]

Havant it is!

[ReddOrDedd]

I've never thought of it before, but is "isn't it" correct as far as grammar goes? I mean, does it not mean "is not it"?

 

It is grammatically correct. What it means is 'is it not (so)' – the 'so' is unspoken but understood and incorporated in the meaning.

 

(Well done, Havant! I hope Anderson plays.)

[philyhamann]

I've never thought about it, I've just always used doesn't, haven't, etc.

 

Amazing.

[Tom R]

4-2 Havant!!!

 

WHAT THE FUCK!!!

 

That's just brilliant!

 

Expect to grow extremely tired of the phrase "magic of the Cup" over the next few days...

[Guest PaddyBerger15]

An excellent result for the non-leaguers.

[Tom R]

Why is will not wont instead of "willn't"?

[hamstrung]

Why is will not wont instead of "willn't"?

 

Wouldn't that be won't?

[ReddOrDedd]

Why is will not wont instead of "willn't"?

 

Good question. My guess would be it stems from 'would not', but that's, as I say, a guess.

 

Who gives a monkey's, though - GREAT result for Havant. Here's hoping we don't regret celebrating it, eh??

[Red Nick]

Brilliant, its what the cup is all about

[Dan Vito Corleone]

Good on them. I hope we go for the club record win like, but good on them all the same.

[kopitegaz]

Good on them. I hope we go for the club record win like, but good on them all the same.

 

Dirk and Voro on the wings, just in case. Riise left back (in a locked room, preferably). Torres in goal. Reina centre mid. Carra and Babel up front.

 

We'll shit 'em.

[ReddOrDedd]

Dirk and Voro on the wings, just in case. Riise left back (in a locked room, preferably). Torres in goal. Reina centre mid. Carra and Babel up front.

 

We'll shit 'em.

 

Reina has a very good touch. Let's not hope too good - don't need him giving Rafa an even bigger headache in midfield.

[ReddOrDedd]

(Raf, can I have a game, by the way?)

[zigackly]

If you want to see Anderson play, you have to go other places than Anfield, as he isn`t allowed to play if Swansea goes through.

 

FA regulations means he cant play

 

No, that's a premier league regulation for loans between premier league clubs. I'm about 99% sure it doesn't apply. Anderson himself was about 100% sure, and so were Swansea given that they said so on their website:

 

Ando in Anfield dreamland | Swansea City | News | Press | Press

 

Anyway, I'm just being pedantic after the fact since he can't play now because Havant won.

[Kurt]

No, that's a premier league regulation for loans between premier league clubs. I'm about 99% sure it doesn't apply. Anderson himself was about 100% sure, and so were Swansea given that they said so on their website:

 

Ando in Anfield dreamland | Swansea City | News | Press | Press

 

Anyway, I'm just being pedantic after the fact since he can't play now because Havant won.

 

 

I read that article as well. But after that one I read somewhere else...maybe on liverpool.no that it did`nt matter wether we allowed him to play, he would not be able to, due to regulations.

 

But as you said... it doesnt really matter now.

 

Edit: Anderson får ikke spille mot Liverpool

 

Det samme reglementet ser også ut til å forhindre Paul Anderson i å spille mot Liverpool, dersom Liverpool og Swansea skulle vinne sine omkamper og møtes i 4.runde. I reglementet står det nemlig at fotballforbundet ikke vil gi tillatelse til at utlånsspillere spiller FA-cup mot klubben de er utlånt fra.

 

That was the piece . It says that Anderson wont be able to play against Liverpool as the FA would not allow loan players to face the team they are loaned out from.

[ReddOrDedd]

No, that's a premier league regulation for loans between premier league clubs. I'm about 99% sure it doesn't apply. Anderson himself was about 100% sure, and so were Swansea given that they said so on their website:

 

Ando in Anfield dreamland | Swansea City | News | Press | Press

 

Anyway, I'm just being pedantic after the fact since he can't play now because Havant won.

 

It's a damn shame, but let's face it, it's great that players from Havant are going to get the experience of playing Prem opponents. I hope they do well (but not too well, obviously).

[RedKnight]

Quite looking forward to this tie now.

[zigackly]

That was the piece . It says that Anderson wont be able to play against Liverpool as the FA would not allow loan players to face the team they are loaned out from.

 

I'm aware of the premier league rule, but I'm not aware of an FA rule. I can't be arsed to look it up. You're probably right anyway.