Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Stickman said:

Tells fibs??

 

Lord Darzi

 

"As an Armenian survivor of the Armenian genocide, I have zero tolerance to anti-Semitism, Islamophobic or any other discrimination against religion or race."

 

 

 

 

Lord Darzi was born in 1960. The Armenian Genocide ended in 1917

 

The after effects continued long past 1917. His family were still refugees from genocide when he was born in Iraq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

The after effects continued long past 1917. His family were still refugees from genocide when he was born in Iraq.

Then why didn't he say that he had learnt lessons from the Armenian massacre handed down by his great grandparents ?  

 

Lets be honest , he deliberately made the statement as evocative as possible by over-inflating his personal experiences assuming that most people wouldn't know or check that he was born 43 years after the end of that abomination. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all depends on how broadly you draw the definition of genocide survivor, whether you limit it to those who escaped the immediate killing or extend it to those who were born as refugees to those who escaped. It's similar to how we talk about Palestinian refugees, even though the overwhelming majority of them weren't born in and have never even been to Palestine.

 

I think this is a weak stick to hit him with to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to laugh yesterday when Corbyn made his latest Brexit declarations, I think it was Sky News who somehow turned relative clarity (which they've been asking for) into criticism along the lines of "Corbyn has made clear Labour's Brexit position while in opposition, but not if they were in government".  He literally cannot win. 

 

As for antisemitism, I think it would be easier for all concerned to be provided with list of approved criticisms of Israel rather than the, apparent, disputes over the definition of antisemitism. People should not be fearful of criticising apartheid.  Maybe such a list already exists? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sir roger said:

How dare Labour use facts in response to an aggressively anti tv programme.

 

Seems quite a sensible approach to have a set strategy knowing the shitstorm likely from all of the usual suspects. 

It’s not a press strategy though is it?  It’s aimed

at you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Why would you trust the press when it is they that are muck spreading in the first place ?

Better to have an army untrained supporters doing it, inevitably fucking it up and providing all the ammo that’s needed.  Deffo the best way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sixtimes Dog said:

 

I think this is a weak stick to hit him with to be honest.

I actually agree with that. Whether it was a rhetorical flourish or a slip of the tongue, it doesn’t undermine his main point.

 

(The facts that anti-Semitism is rare in the Labour Party and gets stomped on wherever it is found are what undermine his main point. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I actually agree with that. Whether it was a rhetorical flourish or a slip of the tongue, it doesn’t undermine his main point.

 

(The facts that anti-Semitism is rare in the Labour Party and gets stomped on wherever it is found are what undermine his main point. )

You need to read the memo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

You need to read the memo. 

Nobody has sent me a memo.

 

Those tweets that someone claims are from the Leader's office suggest that people respond to Panorama with facts and not personal attacks; coincidentally, that's the tenor of my post about Darzi.

 

So... what is your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...