Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

John Barnes Article in Times


Skully
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

I stopped going to England games in the 80's which had become little more than a paltform for the prejudiced, xenophobic and dispossesed, only recently have i returned ( and it is better).

 

You are right to point out the FA's spineless response to England hooliganism and bigotry right up to the turn of this century.

 

Barnes does speak eloquently about racism, and from first hand experience. I do think however that it is important that as Liverpudlians we show some humility on the race issue. Liverpool in the eighties, was institutionally racist, Everton resisted signing black players for a long time, and our handling of the race v suarez balance has been poor.

 

There is still a reluctance generally to discuss racism in the game generally. Retired players who suffered abuse and now garner sympathy are not enough, nor are modern multi-millionaires who are happy to use it as a publicity platform.

 

What is, and is not, acceptable as banter needs airing without fear or favour. Luis revelaed that he calls Glen negro in training, as do other Man U players of Hernandez, is that ok? If Alan Hansen were to address either as negro on a match of the day interview would that be acceptable?

 

Why have proportionately so few black managers and coaches come through?

 

Too many are happy to swear allegiance to the anti-racism cause- and then dive for cover.

 

The debate is more nuanced than some would imagine, and being black alone does not make for a good advocate of the matter - in my view Garth Crooks has set back the cause of black media pundits by being hopeless, but the likes of John barnes, Dion Dublin and jason Roberts should be encouraged to debate this.

 

They call the players Neg-ro because its spanish culture to do so and until this smear campaign most footballers were happy to be tolerant to other nationalities and cultures,even Evra.

 

Great statement by Diego Lugano saying England is still colonial and embarrassed by racial debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They call the players Neg-ro because its spanish culture to do so and until this smear campaign most footballers were happy to be tolerant to other nationalities and cultures,even Evra.

 

Great statement by Diego Lugano saying England is still colonial and embarrassed by racial debate.

 

Extreme caution should be exercised on the nuances of the use of negro.In South America and Spain black people are subject to racism, and the term can be as abusive, or literal, as it is here. I'm certainly not taking race relations lessons from a Uraguayan.

 

I do agree that the debate on race should be more open, and the lynch mob on Hansen for using the word coloured was embarrassing.

 

Luis', and our, mistake, was that if you are in a foreign country, and cause unintended offence, the first thing you do is offer a profuse apology.

Sadly ego ,and the Manc v Scouse bile,quickly overwhelmed what should have been a minor incident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extreme caution should be exercised on the nuances of the use of negro.In South America and Spain black people are subject to racism, and the term can be as abusive, or literal, as it is here. I'm certainly not taking race relations lessons from a Uraguayan.

 

I do agree that the debate on race should be more open, and the lynch mob on Hansen for using the word coloured was embarrassing.

 

Luis', and our, mistake, was that if you are in a foreign country, and cause unintended offence, the first thing you do is offer a profuse apology.

Sadly ego ,and the Manc v Scouse bile,quickly overwhelmed what should have been a minor incident.

 

Completely disagree.

This is about one Sportsman going out of his way to stain the character of another. What Evra said about Luis family was much worse than what Luis said.

 

The fact that he used the word Negro, which we all know is acceptable in his country and the fact as Luis said that it is a word used by his S America counterparts at United, tells me that Evra went out deliberately to cause problems. I bet Forlan uttered it while he was there as well.

 

People also have very short memories in this country as well, it was'nt that long ago, you were'nt allowed to use the term Black, and coloured was a term used by many.

Christ at one point it was :- Chalkboard instead of Blackboard, You could'nt say Baa Baa Black sheep.

 

One last thing i really hope Terry gets this much shit when his court case is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extreme caution should be exercised on the nuances of the use of negro.In South America and Spain black people are subject to racism, and the term can be as abusive, or literal, as it is here. I'm certainly not taking race relations lessons from a Uraguayan.

 

*Uruguayan

 

Who would you take race relation lessons from? John Barnes? He says there's no such thing as race.

 

Maybe a lesson in Spanish before you start talking about the use of words, in Spanish?

 

How do you apologise to someone for something you didn't say? 'Nigger'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extreme caution should be exercised on the nuances of the use of negro.In South America and Spain black people are subject to racism, and the term can be as abusive, or literal, as it is here. I'm certainly not taking race relations lessons from a Uraguayan.

 

I do agree that the debate on race should be more open, and the lynch mob on Hansen for using the word coloured was embarrassing.

 

Luis', and our, mistake, was that if you are in a foreign country, and cause unintended offence, the first thing you do is offer a profuse apology.

Sadly ego ,and the Manc v Scouse bile,quickly overwhelmed what should have been a minor incident.

 

I've noticed a conspicuous absence of posts from you in the Uruguayan's thread.

It would be interesting to hear the response when you tell him how they feel about racism and how blacks are treated there. You could just cut and paste the same two paragraph blurb you have been recycling for the last few months.

Just an idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed a conspicuous absence of posts from you in the Uruguayan's thread.It would be interesting to hear the response when you tell him how they feel about racism and how blacks are treated there. You could just cut and paste the same two paragraph blurb you have been recycling for the last few months.Just an idea.

 

You have identified the point- that is good enough for me.

 

Race and racism rarely comes in convenient packages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Uruguayan

 

Who would you take race relation lessons from? John Barnes? He says there's no such thing as race.

 

Maybe a lesson in Spanish before you start talking about the use of words, in Spanish?

 

How do you apologise to someone for something you didn't say? 'Nigger'

On the first point- no-one.

On the second there is no dispute regarding the ambiguity of the word in question.

On the third, Luis confirmed what he said in writing.

 

Some really are getting themselves tangled up in knots over this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely disagree.

This is about one Sportsman going out of his way to stain the character of another. What Evra said about Luis family was much worse than what Luis said.

 

The fact that he used the word Negro, which we all know is acceptable in his country and the fact as Luis said that it is a word used by his S America counterparts at United, tells me that Evra went out deliberately to cause problems. I bet Forlan uttered it while he was there as well.

 

People also have very short memories in this country as well, it was'nt that long ago, you were'nt allowed to use the term Black, and coloured was a term used by many.

Christ at one point it was :- Chalkboard instead of Blackboard, You could'nt say Baa Baa Black sheep.

 

One last thing i really hope Terry gets this much shit when his court case is done.

 

Hold on there.

 

The debacle of how the situation was allowed to escalate has been well recorded, how Luis was let down well documented.

 

The word negro is not acceptable in Spanish, it is ambiguous, it may be used in a benign, or offensive manner.

 

My point was that the defence to the charge was that the word was used inoffensively- if it had been backed up immediately by an apology for any unintentional offence caused, a lot of grief would have been saved. That in no way impacts on the other stuff.

 

I think we can be confident that Terry will face consequences which will put Luis punishment n the shade.

 

I could not agree with you more on the lunacy of extreme interpretations of language deemed racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on there.

 

The debacle of how the situation was allowed to escalate has been well recorded, how Luis was let down well documented.

 

The word negro is not acceptable in Spanish, it is ambiguous, it may be used in a benign, or offensive manner.

 

 

Xerxes, I think someone as pernickety as you will allow me to pull you up on a fairly glaring factual point of order.

 

Just because something is ambiguous does NOT make it unacceptable. Context and intent is what makes something acceptable or not.

 

If you're going to high-horse it, please refrain from making blanket, fabricated, just-plain-wrong laws of language.

 

Especially, I would've thought, someone else's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If you're going to high-horse it, please refrain from making blanket, fabricated, just-plain-wrong laws of language.

 

Especially, I would've thought, someone else's.

 

or , as suggested, could just read the other thread:

 

"Here in Uruguay we can tell "negro" to the black ones because the word "negro" and belonging the black race isn't considered offensive. You can be black as you can be white as you can be yellow as you can be whatever you are. I've got the impression that in England you can't tell "negro" to the black ones because of a kind of prejudice that from my point of view it can be perfectly seen as a racism itself.

 

Things are what they are. If you're black there's no reason for not calling you "black". To us it's totally normal."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or , as suggested, could just read the other thread:

 

"Here in Uruguay we can tell "negro" to the black ones because the word "negro" and belonging the black race isn't considered offensive. You can be black as you can be white as you can be yellow as you can be whatever you are. I've got the impression that in England you can't tell "negro" to the black ones because of a kind of prejudice that from my point of view it can be perfectly seen as a racism itself.

 

Things are what they are. If you're black there's no reason for not calling you "black". To us it's totally normal."

 

Of course.

I was more pulling him up on the linguistic lunacy of suggesting ambiguity equals unacceptability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the first point- no-one.

On the second there is no dispute regarding the ambiguity of the word in question.

On the third, Luis confirmed what he said in writing.

 

Some really are getting themselves tangled up in knots over this.

 

'I'm certainly not taking race relations lessons from a Uraguayan.' - says Xerxes the pretzel.

 

Bit narrow minded in itself that, isn't it.

 

OK, how's about a lesson in Spanish from a Uruguayan?

 

Suarez was originally accused of saying the word 'nigger', how do you go about or at what point do you apologise for that?

 

Any excuse to mypost one of my faves -

 

[YOUTUBE]Jn3iybtxNZw[/YOUTUBE]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extreme caution should be exercised on the nuances of the use of negro.In South America and Spain black people are subject to racism, and the term can be as abusive, or literal, as it is here. I'm certainly not taking race relations lessons from a Uraguayan.

 

I do agree that the debate on race should be more open, and the lynch mob on Hansen for using the word coloured was embarrassing.

 

Luis', and our, mistake, was that if you are in a foreign country, and cause unintended offence, the first thing you do is offer a profuse apology.Sadly ego ,and the Manc v Scouse bile,quickly overwhelmed what should have been a minor incident.

 

I agree that throughout we have handled things really poorly however I disagree with this. When Evra said he had been called n****r 10 times that left no room whatsoever for a profuse apology for unintended offence.

 

If Evra had said Suarez had said "por que negro" and that he was offended by that then yes Suarez could have said sorry for unintended offence but the allegation meant that was no longer an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that throughout we have handled things really poorly however I disagree with this. When Evra said he had been called n****r 10 times that left no room whatsoever for a profuse apology for unintended offence.

 

 

Exactly.

 

And the torrent of fictitious shite in the final report, which 'the reliable witness' changed it to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest The Chimp

If people were as vehemently opposed to racism as they claim to be, then surely they'd be all over any individual who risks setting the same course back through falsely accusing someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to keep this point out there in case people forget about it.

The independent language "experts" that the FA used for their stitch up agreed in the report that "If Luis Suarez is telling the truth the phrase he used would not be considered racist".

.

 

I never saw this but am glad you posted it as it gives me an additional response for when mongs come back with "but he admitted it" when he is defended as they don't seem to understand words mean different things in other cultures

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to keep this point out there in case people forget about it.

The independent language "experts" that the FA used for their stitch up agreed in the report that "If Luis Suarez is telling the truth the phrase he used would not be considered racist".

So seeing as I believe Luis in his version of events over the quite ludicrous claims of Evra with his blackie' date=' blackie, blackie claim, I believe a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred here and I know I will never be satisfied untill the truth is told either by a manc player with a conscience or someone from our own club decides to get it all out there.[/quote']

 

The only think which could clear Suarez is a death-bed confession from Evra. Any volunteers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...