Suicide

[dennis tooth]

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/water.htm

[dennis tooth]

"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official

of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the

Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and

sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the

chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person

who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more

will never again be the same person mentally or physically." CHARLES E.

PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954.

[dennis tooth]

What sec?

 

 

 

The Pharmaceutical Drug Cartel

Unethical Business Practices, Corruption, and False Product Claims

- A Public Health Threat -

by: Arthur M. Evangelista, PhD

former FDA Investigator

 

Research data, public records, and regulatory evidence indicates that false drug claims, and unethical or fraudulent pharmaceutical clinical practices and marketing practices create serious health threats for individuals (and their families) who use prescription or conventional OTC

(over-the-counter) drugs or health products.[1]

 

Deceptions in testing, clinical trials, product safety, and marketing may also occur in concert

with corrupted or negligent regulatory processes or from corporate-friendly political pressure greasing the "wheels of the regulatory process"; and sometimes all three occur simultaneously.[2] We coined a term: " Government and Corporate corruption, KILLS "

 

 

 

 

 

THE PHARMACEUTICAL CARTEL

 

 

The term 'pharmaceutical cartel' is a descriptive name for the politically influential, profit-driven assortment of pharmaceutical-chemical, and biotech firms headquartered in the United States

and around the globe.

 

Interestingly, it seems that a few of these older, larger drug firms are 'quasi-offspring' from the dubious mold of the drug company, I.G. Farben, (circa 1920's Germany). Records show that I.G. Farben engaged in human experimentation and was a producer of chemical warfare and population control agents.[3] Firms, such as Monsanto (now Pharmacia-Pfizer), G.D. Searle, and Bayer appear to have historical ties to this pre-WWII drug firm. This connection includes ties to the U.S. Chemical Weapons Research Programs, as well.

 

 

 

 

FALSE CLAIMS, PUBLIC MANIPULATION, and CASH BACK ...

 

 

A review of financial statements from 1999, indicates that the global drug industry pocketed more than $ 471 billion (U.S) dollars, and profits are growing. Canadian 1999 drug sales, alone, were almost $ 9 billion.[ii] That's a lot of little pink pills, folks.

 

Before a drug is officially approved and then offered for clinical use or sale, prescription drugs (allegedly) undergo relevant, and stringent 'safety' and efficacy testing by the pharmaceutical manufacturers, themselves (or their subcontractors).

 

To support the large amount of profits involved with pharmaceuticals, we may see falsification or manipulation of drug data or product test methods to help "ease the adverse effects" associated with a particular formulation.[4]

 

A classic example of falsification of test data and deceptive marketing practices occurred in 1995 with the diet drug, Fen-Phen.[5] Basically, Fen-Phen affects serotonin levels in the brain, providing a slight elevation of mood.[6] As a diet drug for weight loss, it was not very effective.

About only 3% of the individuals taking Fen-Phen (Redux) experienced any weight loss.

 

What did happen, as reported in the August 8, 1977 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine (Dr. Heidi Connelly of the Mayo Clinic), was that users of Fen-Phen began experiencing pulmonary hypertension and heart-value damage.[iii] This resulted in

approximately 130 reported American deaths, and heart valve damage on a massive scale.

 

Sometimes deceptive marketing practices (false advertising) can make up for a products "secret failures". What a drug company cannot manipulate in the lab, it will manipulate in the press and medical journals, or through direct false testimony or claims about its product.[7]

 

Another product we have seen in many recent commercials, is Celebrex, an anti-arthritic drug. Promoted by its maker, Monsanto (Pharmacia), Celebrex was hyped as having lower gastrointestinal problems and complications. This marketing angle suggested that Celebrex had

a "proven" safety advantage over its older competition, diclofenac and ibuprofen.[8]

 

Written medical journal articles appeared, emphasizing the "favorable findings" to the medical community. This false journal information was provided by public relations 'spin doctors'

and ghost writers.[9] [10]

 

In addition to signing ghost-written promotional articles, sometimes medical professionals are bribed with a stipend to promote drug products, or paid to help enhance the drug firm's political or professional clout, influence, or public perception.

 

A subsequent investigation into Celebrex claims and test data revealed gatrointenstinal problems. Adverse reactions of gastrointestinal and stomach ulcers were instigated by Celebrex, showing no such safety advantage over the older medications. This further fueled concern "for less

obvious adverse effects from decreased blood flow to the heart".[11]

 

 

What what

[ZonkoVille77]

I negged Hades in error. Please rectify on my behalf. Thank you please.

[dennis tooth]

Howdyalikedeespills?

 

 

Published January 1, 2005

 

 

 

LONDON -- A British medical publication said Friday that it had given U.S. regulators

 

confidential drug company documents suggesting a link between the antidepressant

 

Prozac, and a heightened risk of suicide attempts and violence.

 

 

The British Medical Journal reported in its latest issue that documents it received

 

from an anonymous source indicated that Prozac's manufacturer, Eli Lilly and Co.,

 

was aware in the 1980s that the drug could have potentially dangerous or fatal

 

side-effects !!

 

 

 

 

The journal said the documents, reportedly missing for a decade, had formed part of

 

a 1994 lawsuit

 

against Eli Lilly on behalf of victims of a workplace shooting in Louisville.

 

Joseph Wesbecker,

 

the man who killed eight people and himself in 1989, had been prescribed Prozac a month

 

before the shootings, as others in more recent incidents resulting in death.

 

Eli Lilly won the case but later disclosed that it had reached a secret settlement with the plaintiffs

 

during the trial.

 

The journal said that one of the records, dated November 1988, reported that fluoxetine,

 

the generic name for Prozac, had caused extreme and dangerous "behavioral disturbances" in

 

clinical trials.

 

 

The journal said it had turned the documents over to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,

 

which had agreed to review them.

 

The journal said the office of Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.)

 

also was examining the documents to determine whether Eli Lilly had withheld data from the public

 

and possibly the FDA.

 

"This is an alarming study that should have been shared with the public from

 

the get-go, not 16 years later," Hinchey was quoted as saying.

 

Lilly representatives said it had always

 

been the company's objective to disclose data about the safety

 

and efficacy of Prozac.

 

 

 

"To our knowledge, there has never been any allegation of missing documents from the Wesbecker

 

trial or any other trial involving Lilly," the company said Friday in a statement.

 

Lily has said it has consistently provided regulatory agencies results from clinical trials and safety monitoring.

"Based on this, Lilly believes that there is no new scientific information to review on this topic," the company's statement said.

 

In an earlier statement issued to the British journal, Lilly said Prozac

 

"has helped to significantly improve millions of lives." (...while killing others...)

 

"It is one of the most studied drugs in the history of medicine and has been prescribed for more

 

than 50 million people worldwide in 2002. The safety and efficacy of Prozac is well studied,

 

well documented and well established," that statement said.

Then why are we having this conversation ??

 

In October, the FDA ordered that all antidepressants carry warnings that they "increase the risk of

 

suicidal thinking and behavior" in children.

 

 

Prozac Chemical Make-Up

 

This is why Fluorides are a key ingredient of Prozac and many other psychiatric drugs. Prozac, scientific name Fluoxetine, is 94% fluoride.

 

Toxicologist Phyllis Mullenix demonstrated in the mid-1980's that rats given fluoride as youngsters or adults became passive, underactive and lethargic. This explains, in part, the obesity issue in our country. This subsequently makes you think about why the American people are so "laid back" about rampant corruption in our fascist or corporate-government. If you wanted to take over a country and its citizens, what would be the easiest way to do it ?

 

Drug the population; poison them; and keep information hidden from them...just what the government is doing right this very minute !!! Its time to wake up people...

 

______________________________________________________________________

[Rico1304]

I negged Hades in error. Please rectify on my behalf. Thank you please.

Done.

 

Can you neg Denis because my neg gun is empty after blasting him most of the last 2 days?

[Rico1304]

Dennis, despite having access to all this information about mental health and the root causes of mental illness are you the single most mental cunt I've ever come across?

[Spy Bee]

At the end of the day, a lot of depression is down to chemicals, that's why half of Scandinavia are swinging from chicken wire come October time while portoguese street kids without a pot to piss in are doing cartwheels down the donkey path. With that in mind, surely using chemicals to fight a chemical problem makes absolute sense.

I don't get this, are you saying they have different chemicals in Portugal then Finland?

 

I thought the suicide rates would be more to do with having freezing winters, 20 hours of darkness and sometimes very isolated existences due to the population spread. Well, that and the drinking cultures being quite different.

[Champ]

With the best will in the world, Dennis, these are blunt instruments...nah, life's too short

[Dr Nowt]

Why would you barge in on a thread with the title 'Suicide', where people are talking candidly about what has worked for them in the struggle to lead a life of quiet desperation as many of us endure either in patches or permanently, and rubbish people's highly personal experiences and thoughts?

 

Any illness, be it mental or physical, is usually a very individual thing with a combination of many factors relating to that person's specific make-up and circumstances wrapped up in how it can best be approached by them. It's about tuning into yourself and seeing what works, with the only bias being on what gets you through and hopefully, one day, thriving. When you're too unwell one way or another to do that without help, staying alive is good, so any port in a storm.

 

You'd just never write off someone's opinions when they've written something like Silver Song did. He sounds like a wise man who's to be much respected.

 

There's having a laugh and a bit of internet one-upmanship and there's just being a rude twat.

[TheHowieLama]

Dennis, despite having access to all this information about mental health and the root causes of mental illness are you the single most mental cunt I've ever come across?

 

 

Good question.

[dennis tooth]

Why would you barge in on a thread with the title 'Suicide', where people are talking candidly about what has worked for them in the struggle to lead a life of quiet desperation as many of us endure either in patches or permanently, and rubbish people's highly personal experiences and thoughts?

Any illness, be it mental or physical, is usually a very individual thing with a combination of many factors relating to that person's specific make-up and circumstances wrapped up in how it can best be approached by them. It's about tuning into yourself and seeing what works, with the only bias being on what gets you through and hopefully, one day, thriving. When you're too unwell one way or another to do that without help, staying alive is good, so any port in a storm.

You'd just never write off someone's opinions when they've written something like Silver Song did. He sounds like a wise man who's to be much respected.

There's having a laugh and a bit of internet one-upmanship and there's just being a rude twat.

Well the road to heaven is paved with bad intentions and taste. I can take the shitstorm i care about you all dont you take dem pillz, do some research on the content and what phd's are saying

 

http://www.madinamerica.com/2012/02/60-minutes-the-ssris-and-the-dirty-little-secret-2/

 

And listen to the experts, which isnt your doctor unless theyve read the studies by the most qualified people who arent in the pockets of big pharma, which is just dispensing various forms of flouride in most of them.

[dennis tooth]

With the best will in the world, Dennis, these are blunt instruments...nah, life's too short

In her September 13, 2004 testimony to the FDA, Dr. Ann Blake Tracy, PhD, author of Prozac:

 

Panacea or Pandora? testified:

 

“The last 15 years of my life have been devoted full time to researching and writing about SSRI* antidepressants. Research on serotonin has been clear … that the most damaging thing that could be done to the … system would be to impair one’s ability to metabolize serotonin. Yet that is exactly how SSRI antidepressants exert their effects….

 

“For decades research has shown that impairing serotonin metabolism will produce … hostility, violent crime,… impulsive behavior with no concern for punishment, and argumentative behavior….

 

“Can you remember two decades ago when depressed people used to slip away quietly to kill themselves rather than killing everyone around them and then themselves as they do while taking SSRI antidepressants? ….

 

“A study out of the University of Southern California in 1996 looked at a group of mutant mice in an experiment that had gone terribly wrong. These genetically engineered mice were the most violent creatures they had ever witnessed. They were born lacking the… enzyme which metabolizes serotonin. As a result their brains were awash in serotonin. This excess serotonin is what the researchers determined was the cause for this extreme violence. Antidepressants produce the same end result as they inhibit the metabolism of serotonin…

 

“It is believed that the high serotonin levels over stimulate the brain stem leading to a lack of muscle paralysis during sleep thus allowing the patient to act out the dreams or nightmares they are having. Connecticut witnessed the Prozac-induced case of Kelly Silk several years ago. This young mother attacked her family with a knife, then set the house on fire killing all but her 8 year old daughter who ran to the neighbors. As she stood bleeding and screaming for help she explained, ‘Help! My mommy is having a nightmare!”

[stringvest]

You dont half chat shit get off the pills do you know what they contain and why they contain it.

Dennis your ignorance is one thing - we can laugh at or ignore it - but your blend of ignorance, bellicosity and offensiveness is fucking tiresome. Learn some empathy, manners and good grace you befuddled fuck.

 

[dennis tooth]

The Prozac Calamity by award winning Scientist Shane Ellison

I love Big Pharma. After getting a masters degree in drug design, I was fortunate enough to work within their stinky labs and learn the inner workings of corporate drug making (and dealing). My most important lesson: Not all drugs are bad. Some are really bad. Take the so-called antidepressant Prozac as an example…

 

By Shane Ellison, Award winning Scientist, Masters Degree in Organic Chemistry

August 12, 2009

 

I love Big Pharma. After getting a masters degree in drug design, I was fortunate enough to work within their stinky labs and learn the inner workings of corporate drug making (and dealing). My most important lesson: Not all drugs are bad. Some are really bad. Take the so-called antidepressant Prozac as an example.

 

In 1990, Prozac appeared on the cover of the pharmaceutically compliant, Newsweek magazine with the headline “Prozac: A Breakthrough Drug for Depression.” It was designed almost twenty years prior. And during that time, some ghastly findings were made which proved the drug to be the antithesis of what popular media touted it as. Such findings were kept hidden. Patients are learning the hard way.

 

Thirteen days after taking the SSRI Prozac, on April 28, 2003, Jordan’s wife of 56 years, Kathy, found his lifeless body hanging from a beam in a back room of their shop. Not depressed at the time of his appointment, Jordan was given a free sample of Prozac for “chest pains!” Apparently, a pretty drug rep convinced Jordan’s doctor that Prozac could be used for these types of “off-label” purposes. By FDA standards, this is totally illegal. But those standards are never enforced by the consumer watch dog turned Big Pharma lap dog. Regardless of what they are prescribed for, Prozac is a real and present danger to SSRI users.

 

SSRI’s strive to increase the levels of a “coping” molecule known as serotonin in the brain. It helps us FIND happiness when it’s covered in an avalanche of nastiness. SSRI’s attempt to boost serotonin by “selectively” stopping the “reuptake” of it among brain cells. This is where the whole SSRI acronym came from – “selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.” It’s a slick name that seems to hypnotize medical doctors into prescribing submission, but it’s a really stupid idea.

 

Nothing is selective in the body. While trying to block the reuptake of serotonin, SSRI’s can also prevent its release. The areas of the brain responsible for release and reuptake are so damn similar (after all, they work on the same molecule) that an SSRI isn’t smart enough to understand which one it is supposed to work on. So it does what any dumb drug would do, it blocks both. The end result: no coping molecules in the brain. Deep sadness, fear or anger can set in. Early studies proved this.

 

The first testing of Prozac was performed on dogs and cats. Every trial showed that Prozac use caused aggression amongst these normally calm and friendly animals, as could be seen by increased hissing and growling. When the animals were taken off of the drug, they returned to their usual friendly behavior. Researchers concluded that Prozac use causes aggressive behavior.

 

By mid 1978, Prozac testing moved to humans in controlled clinical trials involving more than 4000 patients. In an attempt to hide its aggressive tendencies, the study allowed for voluntary dropout of those who experienced the most severe side effects. Additionally, clinical investigators were allowed to administer concurrent sedatives to patients to further mask Prozac’s side effects that would most likely lead to violence/suicide. This is a common loophole used by drug company-funded drug trials and is known as “checkbook science.” Despite the lack of scientific methodology, this study concluded that Prozac works well to a “statistically significant” degree in a population of depressed patients.

 

Since its approval, the potential for Prozac calamity has become frighteningly clear amongst both professionals and the public. Reports of Prozac-associated suicide, written by James D. Hagerty and distributed by the Drugs and Devices Information Line at the Harvard School of Public Health, dominated the “Letters to the Editor” section of the American Journal of Psychiatry during the fall of 1990.

 

Under the FDA’s own analysis, there have been more than 20,000 Prozac-related suicides since 1987.

 

Clinical studies performed on Prozac show 191 negative side effects per 100 people. This equates to almost two negative side effects for every user of the drug.

 

The FDA continues to ignore the Prozac body count (they approved Prozac’s use for children in 2003). To make matters worse, the FDA granted its manufacturer, Eli Lilly, extended patent protection. In order to procure thirty additional months of earning power, Eli Lilly changed the name of Prozac to Sarafem, while at the same time labeling common personality and biological shifts as a disease among women; this “disease” being premenstrual irritability. As a result, thousands of unsuspecting women were given Prozac for premenstrual irritability while at the same time increasing their chances of suffering from the aforementioned negative side effects such as aggression, and suicide.

 

Such lessons got me out of corporate drug making. Thankfully, they taught me how not to be healthy: Take prescription drugs. You can do the same, just say no to Prozac.

 

About the Author

 

Ellison’s entire career has been dedicated to the study of molecules; how they give life and how they take from it. He was a two-time recipient of the prestigious Howard Hughes Medical Institute Research Grant for his research in biochemistry and physiology. He is a best selling author, holds a master’s degree in organic chemistry and has first-hand experience in drug design. Use his knowledge and insight to look and feel your best with his Secret Cures monthly report. Get it free at www.thepeopleschemist.com

[dennis tooth]

Dennis your ignorance is one thing - we can laugh at or ignore it - but your blend of ignorance, bellicosity and offensiveness is fucking tiresome. Learn some empathy, manners and good grace you befuddled fuck.

Now youve insulted me your threats to insult me further are giving me no option but to continue displaying my ignorance to infinity.

[dennis tooth]

Until you all fuckin learn yeselfs wot ur talking about bathe in my light

 

 

Glaxo Faces Criminal

Action In UK Over

'Suicide' Pills - Paxil

From Dr. Ann Blake Tracy, PhD

6-7-4

 

This is a newsletter that just went out to our Drugawareness E-group and I knew you would all be interested in this late breaking news on the antidepressant front as well.

 

Also, if any of you carried the story last Wednesday on Prozac being good for children you should know that both Dr. Emslie and Dr. March have major confilcts of interest and therefore, never should have been allowed to do this study. On top of that, in reading the results of the study there was NO evidence that Prozac was beneficial unless you call what they found as beneficial: a DOUBLING of the suicide rate and a suicide attempt rate FIVE TIMES GREATER on Prozac than placebo. So, I ask again, where was the evidence of any benefit? And why was none of that reported to the public?

 

For additional information contact:

 

Ann Blake Tracy, Ph.D. Executive Director, International Coalition For Drug Awareness Author: Prozac: Panacea or Pandora? - Our Serotonin Nightmare & audio tape on safe withdrawal: "Help! I Can't Get Off My Antidepressant!"

 

Order Number: 800-280-0730

Website: www.drugawareness.org

Office Number: 801-282-5282

Cell: 801-209-1800

 

Four days ago I sent you the news that the NY Attorney General had filed a suit against GlaxoSmithKline over Paxil and in that message I made the following statement: "United Kingdom has been considering criminal charges against this company for almost a year for this same exact reason. With this action by the state of New York will we see them now act on that as well?"

 

And today we have that answer in VERY bold headlines stating it the way it is: "Glaxo may face prosecution over antidepressant" or "Glaxo faces criminal action in Britain over 'suicide' pills" - exactly what I have said for 15 years, although "murder/suicide pills" may have been a better fit.

 

Paxil was the worst of the SSRIs until Celexa hit the market - as if you can pick one out as one's worst poison? They all work the same way and they all produce the same results - some may take a day or two longer is all. But I predict that Effexor will be the next to bite the dust because it is such a nasty drug. When they marketed it as "Prozac with a kick" they were not kidding!

 

Anyway I don't think anyone would want to be in the shoes of Glaxo spokeswoman Mary Ann Rhyne right now. The end of May Italian police announced they want 4000 doctors and 273 Glaxo employees put on trial. Then the NY Attorney General last week, Canada issued their strong warning against this group of drugs a day or two later, and now Britian plans to file criminal charges. Talk about a public relations nightmare! They are being hit from the four corners of the earth!

 

Considering how many lives I have seen lost to this drug, or lives destroyed as a result, or people addicted to it in terrible withdrawal, I have no compassion for Glaxo. The old saying, "You reap what you sow" certainly applies in this case.

 

Ann Blake Tracy, Ph.D.

 

Executive Director, International Coalition For Drug Awareness Author: Prozac: Panacea or Pandora? - Our Serotonin Nightmare & audio tape on safe withdrawal: "Help! I Can't Get Off My Antidepressant!"

 

Order Number: 800-280-0730 www.drugawareness.org

 

 

Glaxo Faces Criminal Action In Britain Over 'Suicide' Pills

 

By Paul Durman and Dominic Rushe

Times Online - UK

6-6-4

 

GLAXO SMITH KLINE is facing a potential criminal prosecution for allegedly failing to inform British health regulators about the suicide risks associated with Seroxat, its blockbuster anti-depressant. Officials at the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) launched an investigation into Glaxo because of concerns that Britain's biggest pharmaceutical group had withheld important data from clinical trials.

 

This showed that Seroxat could cause an increased risk of suicide and " self-harm" if prescribed to depressed teenagers.

 

The MHRA and the Committee on Safety of Medicines only received full details of the trials in May last year. Within two weeks, the MHRA announced a ban on giving Seroxat to children under 18 - the first regulator in the world to take such a step. Shortly afterwards, the US Food and Drug Administration issued similar, though less categorical, advice to doctors.

 

The MHRA investigation is expected to report its findings shortly. This weekend the MHRA said it "treats very seriously any failure to comply with the law. Last year, the MHRA announced that it would investigate Glaxo to make sure the company had complied with its legal obligations under UK and European law."

 

Drug companies are obliged to report new evidence that changes the balance of risks and benefits of using their products.

 

Depending on its findings, the MHRA could choose to prosecute either Glaxo as a company or go after named individuals. If found guilty, the penalties could include fines or imprisonment.

 

The MHRA action comes when Glaxo is still reeling from allegations last week that it had "engaged in repeated and persistent fraud by misrepresenting, concealing and otherwise failing to disclose" important information about the safety and efficacy of Seroxat, which is known as Paxil in America. The company must defend itself against a lawsuit from Eliot Spitzer, the New York attorney-general who first came to prominence after taking on the abuses of Wall Street banks during the technology boom.

 

Jean-Pierre Garnier, Glaxo's chief executive, insisted the firm had provided regulators with all trial data. "We are a high-integrity company," he said. " We know what the rules are and we follow them. We have a policy of publishing our negative data to the authorities."

 

The British case rests on some of the same evidence as that of the New York lawsuit.

 

Garnier said it could be dangerous to change medical advice based on a single clinical study. "Sometimes you have to wait for all studies to come in before you have some sort of conclusion."

 

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8209-1135320,00.html

 

 

Glaxo May Face Prosecution Over Anti-Depressant

 

6-7-4

 

LONDON (Reuters) - GlaxoSmithKline may face prosecution for allegedly not informing health authorities about suicide risks associated with its antidepressant Seroxat, The Sunday Times has reported.

 

Europe's largest drugmaker is already facing charges by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer over the use of the drug, sold in the United States as Paxil, on children.

 

The Sunday Times said the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had begun an investigation because of fears that Glaxo held back important information from clinical trials.

 

The information indicated that Seroxat may cause a greater risk of suicide and "self-harm" if given to depressed teenagers, the paper said.

 

A spokeswoman for MHRA -- the government's watchdog on drug safety -- confirmed it was investigating Glaxo on the Seroxat issue.

 

"The MHRA treats very seriously any failure to comply with the law. Last year, MHRA announced that they would investigate (Glaxo) to establish whether they had complied with their legal obligations under UK and European law," she said.

 

"The investigation is ongoing and will report shortly," she added. She did not elaborate.

 

A Glaxo spokesman declined to comment.

 

The use of Seroxat and other similar drugs to treat children is under medical scrutiny because of worries about higher suicide risks, leading U.S. and British regulators to issue warnings against using it for patients under the age of 18.

 

Spitzer filed a lawsuit against Glaxo on Wednesday over charges that it fraudulently concealed studies showing that the antidepressant may not work when used to treat children and could lead to suicidal behaviour.

 

"The company suppressed the negative results of the other studies, which failed to demonstrate that Paxil is effective and which suggested a possible increase risk of suicidal thinking and acts," Spitzer said. This amounted to "repeated and persistent fraud," he said.

 

Glaxo spokeswoman Mary Ann Rhyne said on Wednesday that the company disseminated information about all its trials either in medical journals or at public scientific meetings as well as to regulatory agencies.

 

The Sunday Times said the MHRA may choose to prosecute Glaxo or go after specific individuals at the company.

 

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=b

usinessNews&storyID=524209&section=finance

[dennis tooth]

Cups ear?

 

Im the last person who was on the shitter if anyone asks.

[stringvest]

You can get tablets for that

[Section_31]

I don't get this, are you saying they have different chemicals in Portugal then Finland?

 

I thought the suicide rates would be more to do with having freezing winters, 20 hours of darkness and sometimes very isolated existences due to the population spread. Well, that and the drinking cultures being quite different.

 

No, I mean the environmental conditions produce different chemical responses in their brains. The scandos have well structures and safe societies and yet have high suicide rates, largely thought to be down to sunlight, equatorial countries have lower suicide rates - despite tending to have worse conditions when it comes to issues like financial and crime pressures. 

[Section_31]

Don't see how you can get angry with Dennis, it's like a cocker spaniel shitting in your hall. 

[dennis tooth]

Dennis, despite having access to all this information about mental health and the root causes of mental illness are you the single most mental cunt I've ever come across?

Im embedded in your bones

Your in denial

You be comin back i know

You be havin the cold swetz wit the runny nose

And the bubble guts

I giv u a couple puffs

Of this fire right here you never get enuff

You a addict for me

Dont pretend that you not

I dont fuck up lungs or leave track marks

May cause rowdiness but not drowsiness

 

Keep out the reach of children im a bad influence

I make the lil bastards grow up faster

And start askin questions you cant answer

I make old women feel young

Make your pappa wanna hit the clubs

[Spy Bee]

I like to think I am mentally strong, so if I ever considered killing myself I'd be bloody suicidal!

[dennis tooth]

No, I mean the environmental conditions produce different chemical responses in their brains. The scandos have well structures and safe societies and yet have high suicide rates, largely thought to be down to sunlight, equatorial countries have lower suicide rates - despite tending to have worse conditions when it comes to issues like financial and crime pressures.

 

Scienctriffic.

[dennis tooth]

Don't see how you can get angry with Dennis, it's like a cocker spaniel shitting in your hall.

 

Try explaining the mona lisa to a dog is my experience.