Bad shit going down in Brussels

[What_What]

Blah blah blah.

 

You're genuinely claiming that people on here are shy and reserved and aren't posting their true feelings because of fear of being called names? On here? Really?

 

Get to fuck. People aren't backing you up because you're a fucking mentalist and they don't agree with your madness. Nothing more. Nothing less.

 

 

Keep trying to suppress the truth, you won't win.

 

The little interest I had in you has come to an end, you carry on throwing a tantrum.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Keep trying to suppress the truth, you won't win.

 

The little interest I had in you has come to an end, you carry on throwing a tantrum.

I will. You keep on crossing over when you see a brown person and jacking off to those Lee Rigby posters.

 

Sad case.

[What_What]

Still quacking on, you ridiculous cunt?

 

[What_What]

Sounds familiar...   Enough With The Teddy Bears And Tears: It’s Time To Take Our Civilization Back

Carl Court/Getty Images

by Raheem Kassam23 Mar 20166,575

Teddy bears, tears, candles, cartoons, murals, mosaics, flowers, flags, projections, hashtags, balloons, wreaths, lights, vigils, scarves, and more. These are the best solutions the Western world seems to come up with every few months when we are slammed by another Islamist terrorist attack. We are our own sickness.

Since the world learned of the dozens dead, hundreds injured, and hundreds of thousands affected by Monday’s attack on the NATO and European Union capital, we have seen an outpouring of what is commonly known as “solidarity”.

This word – most commonly associated with hard-left politics, trades union activism, socialism, and poseur indie rock bands – has come to mean very little in reality. In effect, “standing in solidarity” with someone now means that you have observed the situation, changed your Facebook profile picture accordingly, and patted yourself on the back.

And if like dead bodies Facebook profile pictures lost heat, it would be accurate to say that the Tricolores that adorned the social media profiles of many had hardly become cold before we were all changing the colours of the bands on the flags. From blue to black. From white to yellow. The blood red remains.

Because nowadays, teddy bears are the new resolve. They symbolise everything we have become in response to our way of life being threatened, and our people being slaughtered on our streets: inanimate, squishy, and full of crap.

Our security services and our police, hamstrung by political correctness, are just as interested (or more?) in rounding up Twitter “hate speech” offenders than criminal, rapist, or terrorist migrants. Our borders are as porous as our brains. We refuse to realise that there are now literally millions of people amongst us who hate us. Who hate our way of life, and who will, one day, dominate our public life.

But of course, such statements are dismissed as fear-mongering, alarmist, or “out of touch with reality”. As if the data doesn’t exist, or the demographics aren’t shifting quickly enough to notice.

As if vast parts of our towns and cities haven’t become ghettos, or no-go zones, or hubs of child grooming activity, or terrorism.

As if mosques, schools, prisons, and universities aren’t used as recruiting grounds for radicals.

As if the blood of our countrymen hasn’t even been spilled at all.

Instead, we will now think deeply about how we can “reach out” to these populations. How we can “co-exist” and “be tolerant” of one another. As if toleration – which is actually the permittance of what is not actually approved or desired – is a healthy aspiration for a society.

It is as if we model our countries on the practice of bending over and “taking one for the team”, chastising those who fail to “tolerate” the most barbaric traditions of alien cultures. It is everything this cartoon – obviously branded “racist” – suggests.

“But come on, Raheem, not all immigrants, or Muslims, are criminals, or rapists…. you’re not!” 

Yeah – and look at me. Excoriated daily by Islamists on Twitter. Why? Because I’ve integrated and I love my country. Because I refuse to believe that an Islamic caliphate is the best thing for Britain, or anywhere, quite frankly. Where is my white (or brown) knight? Where are the voices of the moderate Muslim world defending me? 

Not that I need protection, or defence, but some people aren’t as hard headed or resolved as I am.

Thusly, the albeit minority evil amongst British Muslims is thriving because good Muslims are doing nothing. At some point, we have to question why. I’m not sure most people are ready for the answers to that one.

So continue to sit there with your head in your hands. Mourning only to make yourself feel better. Missing people you never knew. Exclaiming, as the most immature of minds does: “Why can’t we all just get along?”

Expressing sympathy is no bad thing. But to be truly sympathetic towards someone under attack, one must be chivalrous, gallant, and unafraid.

Watching someone getting raped, and tweeting your solidarity with them is not enough. Human nature and goodness calls upon us to intervene. To assist. To free someone from their torture, and to save them from their demise.

It is not enough to scrawl “no fear” on a post it note, and stick it onto some £3 flowers.

We must be fearless in electing leaders who we feel will best keep us safe. It is one of the few areas of our lives in which we should be able to feel comfortable. We pay our taxes, you keep us safe.

If not, then we must arm ourselves. If our governments refuse to protect us, or even begin to use the tools with which we empower them against us: surveillance, counter-terror laws, detention, then we will need to take the law back into our own hands. We cannot be afraid of doing so. It is where our societies all sprung from.

The defence of ourselves as individuals. The defence of our families, our properties, our means of production, our communities, and our neighbours.

It is why arms sales to individuals has shot up since the migrant crisis in Europe. Many Germans are losing their faith in their elected leaders to protect them. The same applies in Sweden, and in Austria. Some people refuse to take being wiped out laying down. How quaint.

It is also time to start to make serious, wide-reaching demands of our politicians on the subject of immigration and Islamism.

When U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump said what he said about a temporary ban on Muslim immigration, the tolerance lobby went into overdrive: full condemnations across the board from politicians – including presidents and prime ministers, across the media sphere, and you will recall the House of Commons debating a petition to ban the man from the country.

Now even the most politically correct of Hollywood luvvies is asking: is he really that wrong on this?

Because Mr. Trump has thought in a cycle longer than his potential presidency: what does the Western world look like in 20, 30, 50 years? What kind of societies do we leave to our children?

Do we leave cities with soldiers on patrol. With “peace” signs scrawled onto bomb-struck buildings? Or do we leave them safe places, with real promise for the future. Like our parents, or at least our parents’ parents, left us.

In order to confront this question, we have to get to the root cause of the problem. There is too much immigration, or at least, not enough hand-picked immigration, into the Western world today.

People of my age had no choice that our post-war leaders felt the heavy hand of post-colonial guilt on their shoulders, and decided to open up our countries, and flood us with “diversity”.

But we do have a choice to not make the same mistakes again. And we have a duty to correct the ones that were made.

And yes, that does mean exactly what you think it means. It means ending mass migration. It means smashing apart ghettos and no go zones. It means repealing laws that allow for Sharia councils. It means asserting what it means to be British, or European, or American, without fearing a backlash from the political left, or the media classes who scarcely see a face my colour let alone darker.

Let them riot. Let them cry.

I would far rather be subjected to ceaseless “direct action” by the scourges of my own society than import others.

At least if my fellow countrymen are deplorable, I won’t get called a racist for pointing it out.

So put down the teddy bears, burst the balloons, and let’s start demanding again that our countries are safe and civilised. And if we can’t find people who’ll make that happen for us… let’s do it ourselves.

Raheem Kassam is the Editor in Chief of Breitbart London. He tweets at @RaheemKassam and you can follow him on Facebook here

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Breitbart.

 

Haha hahahahahaha hahahahahaha.

 

Fucking hell!

[Jairzinho]

Isn't Breitbart satire?

[Frankenhooker]

Islam is a belief, not a nationality, it's nothing to do with immigration.  Pull out of the EU, stop immigration, that won't change a thing, it won't stop those people who feel alienated falling through the cracks, because, well, they're nationals.  Some people are getting confused, these aren't 'foreigners', they're your neighbours, your schoolmates, people you work with, it isn't a foreign war.

[Anubis]

I thought I'd see if What_What was posting on other forums, to check his right wing credentials, when I came across this gift which is far too amusing not to post, as it brings together so am your elements of the debate.

 

 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Sounds familiar...   Enough With The Teddy Bears And Tears: It’s Time To Take Our Civilization Back

Carl Court/Getty Images

by Raheem Kassam23 Mar 20166,575

Teddy bears, tears, candles, cartoons, murals, mosaics, flowers, flags, projections, hashtags, balloons, wreaths, lights, vigils, scarves, and more. These are the best solutions the Western world seems to come up with every few months when we are slammed by another Islamist terrorist attack. We are our own sickness.

Since the world learned of the dozens dead, hundreds injured, and hundreds of thousands affected by Monday’s attack on the NATO and European Union capital, we have seen an outpouring of what is commonly known as “solidarity”.

This word – most commonly associated with hard-left politics, trades union activism, socialism, and poseur indie rock bands – has come to mean very little in reality. In effect, “standing in solidarity” with someone now means that you have observed the situation, changed your Facebook profile picture accordingly, and patted yourself on the back.

And if like dead bodies Facebook profile pictures lost heat, it would be accurate to say that the Tricolores that adorned the social media profiles of many had hardly become cold before we were all changing the colours of the bands on the flags. From blue to black. From white to yellow. The blood red remains.

 

Because nowadays, teddy bears are the new resolve. They symbolise everything we have become in response to our way of life being threatened, and our people being slaughtered on our streets: inanimate, squishy, and full of crap.

Our security services and our police, hamstrung by political correctness, are just as interested (or more?) in rounding up Twitter “hate speech” offenders than criminal, rapist, or terrorist migrants. Our borders are as porous as our brains. We refuse to realise that there are now literally millions of people amongst us who hate us. Who hate our way of life, and who will, one day, dominate our public life.

 

But of course, such statements are dismissed as fear-mongering, alarmist, or “out of touch with reality”. As if the data doesn’t exist, or the demographics aren’t shifting quickly enough to notice.

As if vast parts of our towns and cities haven’t become ghettos, or no-go zones, or hubs of child grooming activity, or terrorism.

As if mosques, schools, prisons, and universities aren’t used as recruiting grounds for radicals.

As if the blood of our countrymen hasn’t even been spilled at all.

 

Instead, we will now think deeply about how we can “reach out” to these populations. How we can “co-exist” and “be tolerant” of one another. As if toleration – which is actually the permittance of what is not actually approved or desired – is a healthy aspiration for a society.

It is as if we model our countries on the practice of bending over and “taking one for the team”, chastising those who fail to “tolerate” the most barbaric traditions of alien cultures. It is everything this cartoon – obviously branded “racist” – suggests.

“But come on, Raheem, not all immigrants, or Muslims, are criminals, or rapists…. you’re not!” 

Yeah – and look at me. Excoriated daily by Islamists on Twitter. Why? Because I’ve integrated and I love my country. Because I refuse to believe that an Islamic caliphate is the best thing for Britain, or anywhere, quite frankly. Where is my white (or brown) knight? Where are the voices of the moderate Muslim world defending me? 

Not that I need protection, or defence, but some people aren’t as hard headed or resolved as I am.

Thusly, the albeit minority evil amongst British Muslims is thriving because good Muslims are doing nothing. At some point, we have to question why. I’m not sure most people are ready for the answers to that one.

 

So continue to sit there with your head in your hands. Mourning only to make yourself feel better. Missing people you never knew. Exclaiming, as the most immature of minds does: “Why can’t we all just get along?”

Expressing sympathy is no bad thing. But to be truly sympathetic towards someone under attack, one must be chivalrous, gallant, and unafraid.

Watching someone getting raped, and tweeting your solidarity with them is not enough. Human nature and goodness calls upon us to intervene. To assist. To free someone from their torture, and to save them from their demise.

 

It is not enough to scrawl “no fear” on a post it note, and stick it onto some £3 flowers.

We must be fearless in electing leaders who we feel will best keep us safe. It is one of the few areas of our lives in which we should be able to feel comfortable. We pay our taxes, you keep us safe.

If not, then we must arm ourselves. If our governments refuse to protect us, or even begin to use the tools with which we empower them against us: surveillance, counter-terror laws, detention, then we will need to take the law back into our own hands. We cannot be afraid of doing so. It is where our societies all sprung from.

The defence of ourselves as individuals. The defence of our families, our properties, our means of production, our communities, and our neighbours.

 

It is why arms sales to individuals has shot up since the migrant crisis in Europe. Many Germans are losing their faith in their elected leaders to protect them. The same applies in Sweden, and in Austria. Some people refuse to take being wiped out laying down. How quaint.

 

It is also time to start to make serious, wide-reaching demands of our politicians on the subject of immigration and Islamism.

When U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump said what he said about a temporary ban on Muslim immigration, the tolerance lobby went into overdrive: full condemnations across the board from politicians – including presidents and prime ministers, across the media sphere, and you will recall the House of Commons debating a petition to ban the man from the country.

Now even the most politically correct of Hollywood luvvies is asking: is he really that wrong on this?

Because Mr. Trump has thought in a cycle longer than his potential presidency: what does the Western world look like in 20, 30, 50 years? What kind of societies do we leave to our children?

 

Do we leave cities with soldiers on patrol. With “peace” signs scrawled onto bomb-struck buildings? Or do we leave them safe places, with real promise for the future. Like our parents, or at least our parents’ parents, left us.

In order to confront this question, we have to get to the root cause of the problem. There is too much immigration, or at least, not enough hand-picked immigration, into the Western world today.

People of my age had no choice that our post-war leaders felt the heavy hand of post-colonial guilt on their shoulders, and decided to open up our countries, and flood us with “diversity”.

But we do have a choice to not make the same mistakes again. And we have a duty to correct the ones that were made.

 

And yes, that does mean exactly what you think it means. It means ending mass migration. It means smashing apart ghettos and no go zones. It means repealing laws that allow for Sharia councils. It means asserting what it means to be British, or European, or American, without fearing a backlash from the political left, or the media classes who scarcely see a face my colour let alone darker.

Let them riot. Let them cry.

I would far rather be subjected to ceaseless “direct action” by the scourges of my own society than import others.

At least if my fellow countrymen are deplorable, I won’t get called a racist for pointing it out.

So put down the teddy bears, burst the balloons, and let’s start demanding again that our countries are safe and civilised. And if we can’t find people who’ll make that happen for us… let’s do it ourselves.

Raheem Kassam is the Editor in Chief of Breitbart London. He tweets at @RaheemKassam and you can follow him on Facebook here

 

Wow!  Just, fucking Wow!  Not sure I know where to start with that unhinged, dangerous nonsense.

 

Should I start with his identification of "solidarity" as some sort of politically-suspect, deviant activity, rather than a basic human impulse?

 

Should I start with his identification of the attacks in Paris and Brussels as attacks on "our streets" - and his conclusion that we need to stop wringing our hands and start taking up arms?  Is he too fucking stupid to realise that there are also far more regular and deadlier attacks in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, etc - and that there are people who identify those attacks as being against "our" people and are therefore taking up arms against the countries responsible?  After all, "Human nature and goodness calls upon us to intervene. To assist. To free someone from their torture, and to save them from their demise."

 

Should I start with the dishonest shithouse way he hides his lies in rhetorical bullshit.

As if vast parts of our towns and cities haven’t become ghettos, or no-go zones, or hubs of child grooming activity, or terrorism.

As if mosques, schools, prisons, and universities aren’t used as recruiting grounds for radicals.

By hiding these claims behind a dismissive "yeah, well, everybody knows..." attitude, he swerves the obligation to name even one "no-go zone", one "hub of child grooming", one "hub of terrorism" one mosque, one school, or one university which is a "recruiting ground for radicals".  He avoids the need to name any, because he can't; because nowhere in the UK matches those descriptions.

 

Should I start with his repetition of the tired lie that "good Muslims are doing nothing"?  If he's really interested in this - and if he really is a full-time journalist, whose job it is to find out what's going on and then report it truthfully - then it wouldn't take him long to ring round, or visit, a few mosques and find out exactly what good Muslims are doing.  He'd soon find it's not "nothing".

 

Or should I start with him looking to the Fascist Trump, to make our country civilised and safe?

 

WhatWhat - If you've posted that badly-written claptrap to support your argument, you've shot yourself in the foot.

[cloggypop]

What_What shops exclusively at Sports Direct.

 

Proper English brands.

[cloggypop]

The big meff.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Coming to realise this is probably the future of the world for the next few decades, bar a world war.

 

Terrorist group kill innocent civilians

Mass faux mourning on social media.. "Solidarity".

Politicians Condemn said terrorist group, and say they will not win.

"The War on Terror" continues, Countries invade other Middle Eastern countries for retribution and most likely kill thousands of innocent civilians. Thereby creating the next terrorist group and helping said groups recruitment.

 

Rinse........ Repeat.

 

It really is one fucked up planet we live on.

Someone on Facebook today made some comment about worrying about the world their kids are going to grow up in.  

 

It made me think - actually, it's got it's problems, but it's a fuck of a lot better than the one my grandparents and parents grew up in.  World wars, grinding poverty, widespread deaths due to childhood diseases... compared to ours, their lives were nasty, brutish and short.  They also lived in a world in which there were outbreaks of violent atrocities from time to time in different places around the world; but they never felt the immediate impact of those tragedies, because they didn't have the communications media, nor did they have the education to try to make sense of it or even the time and energy to empathise, because they had their own daily struggles to focus on.

 

I grew up with all the benefits of a couple of generations who rejected that and built a better world.  Cunts in power now seem to be trying to drag us back to those harder times, but we don't have to let them.

 

In some ways, I'm quite optimistic for the future (as long as the nukes and climate change don't wipe us all out).

[TheHowieLama]

What_What shops exclusively at Sports Direct. Proper English brands.

 

SD is boss

Got a pair of Patricks off there a few weeks ago

[cloggypop]

SD is boss

Got a pair of Patricks off there a few weeks ago

They sell the cheapest Adidas Samba Super Suede in the country. After that I don't really see the point of them.

 

E, E, EDL, E, E, EDL!

[Hades]

The complete conviction with which What_What is posting his hysterical, unfounded lies is scarier than any terrorist.

[What_What]

Wow!  Just, fucking Wow!  Not sure I know where to start with that unhinged, dangerous nonsense.

 

Should I start with his identification of "solidarity" as some sort of politically-suspect, deviant activity, rather than a basic human impulse?

 

Should I start with his identification of the attacks in Paris and Brussels as attacks on "our streets" - and his conclusion that we need to stop wringing our hands and start taking up arms?  Is he too fucking stupid to realise that there are also far more regular and deadlier attacks in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, etc - and that there are people who identify those attacks as being against "our" people and are therefore taking up arms against the countries responsible?  After all, "Human nature and goodness calls upon us to intervene. To assist. To free someone from their torture, and to save them from their demise."

 

Should I start with the dishonest shithouse way he hides his lies in rhetorical bullshit.

As if vast parts of our towns and cities haven’t become ghettos, or no-go zones, or hubs of child grooming activity, or terrorism.

As if mosques, schools, prisons, and universities aren’t used as recruiting grounds for radicals.

By hiding these claims behind a dismissive "yeah, well, everybody knows..." attitude, he swerves the obligation to name even one "no-go zone", one "hub of child grooming", one "hub of terrorism" one mosque, one school, or one university which is a "recruiting ground for radicals".  He avoids the need to name any, because he can't; because nowhere in the UK matches those descriptions.

 

Should I start with his repetition of the tired lie that "good Muslims are doing nothing"?  If he's really interested in this - and if he really is a full-time journalist, whose job it is to find out what's going on and then report it truthfully - then it wouldn't take him long to ring round, or visit, a few mosques and find out exactly what good Muslims are doing.  He'd soon find it's not "nothing".

 

Or should I start with him looking to the Fascist Trump, to make our country civilised and safe?

 

WhatWhat - If you've posted that badly-written claptrap to support your argument, you've shot yourself in the foot.

 

 

What you should do is take your wife and children (if you've got any) and send them for a walk through Tower Hamlets and see how that goes.

 

 

They might be lucky and only have to put up with the verbals... This is a must watch for any woman by the way, this is exactly where we are heading and have already headed in some parts of the country.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d65LFY3BDc

 

 

 

Also can you reply to the my post about your absurd immigration theory, I don't blame you for not replying because trying to defend that delusion is next to impossible, you're a far left open border type activist aren't you? one of the truly insane.

[What_What]

This is a must watch on Sweden... pure and utter madness, imagine in 10-20 years if it keeps up? The women of this country should be worried, the ones can that think for themselves anyway.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWSMURYM7bA

[What_What]

Night.

 

 

[Hades]

Also can you reply to the my post about your absurd immigration theory, I don't blame you for not replying because trying to defend that delusion is next to impossible, you're a far left open border type activist aren't you? one of the truly insane.

 

If you stop immigration you will get hit with the capitalist double-whammy. Less people buying capitalist products means they'll put prices up and less people to undercut labour means they'll move their workforce overseas. It's a pity you're such a slave to capitalist divide-and-conquer propaganda because you'd be the exact type of person who the working class needs to start a revolution. Capitalism is destroying the planet as well as all its common humanity. You are being misdirected.

[skend04]

22 people killed in a mosque in Nigeria on Thursday by suicide bombers. Now, surely if the suicide bombers represent Islam they wouldn't have targeted a place of worship or am I missing some other point? Is it now considered Islamic to blow up a mosque? I'm getting confused because of what What_What, Naz and Rico have been saying.

[Rico1304]

22 people killed in a mosque in Nigeria on Thursday by suicide bombers. Now, surely if the suicide bombers represent Islam they wouldn't have targeted a place of worship or am I missing some other point? Is it now considered Islamic to blow up a mosque? I'm getting confused because of what What_What, Naz and Rico have been saying.

What the fuck? It's a fact that Muslims kill more Muslims than any other religion. In the religion thread it's something that we talked about at length so don't try and turn that round on me. Pretty disingenuous there Skend

[AngryOfTuebrook]

What you should do is take your wife and children (if you've got any) and send them for a walk through Tower Hamlets and see how that goes.

 

 

They might be lucky and only have to put up with the verbals... This is a must watch for any woman by the way, this is exactly where we are heading and have already headed in some parts of the country.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d65LFY3BDc

 

 

 

Also can you reply to the my post about your absurd immigration theory, I don't blame you for not replying because trying to defend that delusion is next to impossible, you're a far left open border type activist aren't you? one of the truly insane.

I've been to Taaramlits. It's a poverty stricken shithouse, abandoned by the Capitalist pigs troughing it a few miles away. But it's not some kind of citadel of religious fanaticism.

 

I haven't seen your comments on immigration. I'll have a look and if there's anything worth replying to, I'll let you know.

[Hades]

22 people killed in a mosque in Nigeria on Thursday by suicide bombers. Now, surely if the suicide bombers represent Islam they wouldn't have targeted a place of worship or am I missing some other point? Is it now considered Islamic to blow up a mosque? I'm getting confused because of what What_What, Naz and Rico have been saying.

Do not attempt to reason with them, chief. They have been fed their bogeyman and it's all systems go. Forget the causes or the wider political context or the far more pressing issues affecting the world, this is a very big crisis.

[Rico1304]

Do not attempt to reason with them, chief. They have been fed their bogeyman and it's all systems go. Forget the causes or the wider political context or the far more pressing issues affecting the world, this is a very big crisis.

Muslim Statistics

Main Article: Muslim Statistics (Terrorism)

This page consists of various statistics concerning Islam and terrorism. A small sample include:

2012 report finds the majority of world's terrorism committed by Muslims. Almost 9000 deaths caused by Sunni terrorists in 2011.

Esposito/Mogahed find almost 4 out of 10 Muslims worldwide are extremists who think 9/11 was totally/partially/somewhat justified.

More than 95% of all suicide bombing attacks conducted worldwide are carried out by Muslims.

2011 Study finds no link between poverty and support for militant Islamic groups.

[VladimirIlyich]

We always seem to get a Kipper on here ranting shite every now and again as if they have some kind of bot that picks up certain words and then jumps in with mind numbingly boring and inaccurate posts that are expecting us all to suddenly say 'Oh yeah,those right wing nutjobs are right,we're being invaded by muslims and we need to deport them or send them to camps.'

That went down so well last time that what can possibly go wrong?