Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

The Conflict in Afghanistan


Section_31
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

No, my opinion is as I said above, diplomacy right now would be better all things considered. Despite what me, you and the rest of the world think of them. 

Yep, make no criticism of them at all, gag all politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Yes. I'm not really arguing about the merits of such a scheme or the reality of implementing it on the ground. I'm not even arguing that Burgon didn't definitely mean giving money to the Taliban. He might've meant that. But, probably not. 

 

My issue is with the jump to the most dramatic interpretation of his ambiguous comment re: reparations - that of handing a big bag of money to the Taliban - and refusing to accept that his tweet could've possibly meant anything else, even if the word reparations has a few different meanings which would be equally applicable to the situation Burgon was discussing. 

 

It's just a bad faith, troll tactic - Oooh, look at the mad lefty suggesting something really mad, even though he's not necessarily saying what we're claiming he is. 

The fact that he mentioned helping refugees seemed to be overlooked somewhat.

I'm not sure about reparations myself but there is little doubt us and the americans did a lot of damage to the country (over 100,000 civilians dead)but apparently the last 20 years have been a halcyon era 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Yeah good idea for a serving MP to start calling them backward cunts when it's quite clear the diplomatic route with them is probably the best chance the people have got without another war. Fucking hell let's get the PM on calling them all barbaric twats, Biden peering down a camera calling them rabid gobshites .... then try and get them to agree to let women go to school..... 

Tbf the gmnt called Saudis all the murdering bastards under the sun when they started chopping up journalists. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, A Red said:

Labelling them as murderous would be accurate and fair, wouldn't you agree?

 

The word "murderous" isn't one Stig uses very often. Only 15 occasions, according to the search function, and never to refer to the Taliban.

 

You'll never guess who he's called murderous on most (6) occasions...

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

The word "murderous" isn't one Stig uses very often. Only 15 occasions, according to the search function, and never to refer to the Taliban.

 

You'll never guess who he's called murderous on most (6) occasions...

Doing it again SD?  Of course the taliban are murderous. Goes without saying. How many times have you called the taliban murderous? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Doing it again SD?  Of course the taliban are murderous. Goes without saying. How many times have you called the taliban murderous? 

 

I've not used the specific word "murderous" to refer to the Taliban. "Murder" and "murdering", yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gooch said:

Am I reading it wrong or is Burgon suggesting that we effectively pay reparations to the Taliban? Going to assume he's just botched the wording although never know with him, the guy is thick as mince.

Yeah I don’t particularly like the fella either but I don’t think that’s what he’s saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...