Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

*Shakes head* Everton again.


Fugitive

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Pidge said:

Lakers and Clippers

Mets and Yankees

 

Not sure how no derby means more money.

Screenshot_20240131-220729.png

They'll be removing themselves with nobody's help but their own. And if they had any shame they'd be thankful they aren't in the Championship where they should be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Pidge said:

Lakers and Clippers

Mets and Yankees

 

Not sure how no derby means more money.

Screenshot_20240131-220729.png

 

 

What difference does it make they are in a different conference. They still take up marketplace and finances. Does he think that if they we t down bitters would start going to Liverpool games or the new stadium will mean tourist and a whole untapped fanbase will start visiting a team that hasn't won a thing in 30 years

 

 

Also many US cities host multiple teams in multiple sports. Look at New York 2 NFL teams on New Ork/New Jersey and Buffalo up state. The Nets and Knicks in the NBA,MLB Yankees and Mets,NHL Rangers and Islander, boxing regularly 

 

Tin foil hat brigade these lot

confused-so.gif

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Lee909 said:

 

 

What difference does it make they are in a different conference. They still take up marketplace and finances. Does he think that if they we t down bitters would start going to Liverpool games or the new stadium will mean tourist and a whole untapped fanbase will start visiting a team that hasn't won a thing in 30 years

 

 

Also many US cities host multiple teams in multiple sports. Look at New York 2 NFL teams on New Ork/New Jersey and Buffalo up state. The Nets and Knicks in the NBA,MLB Yankees and Mets,NHL Rangers and Islander, boxing regularly 

 

Tin foil hat brigade these lot

confused-so.gif


They’re always coming up with mad theories about how what they do, plan or have done will cause turmoil for us and our plans, and that FSG big wigs are constantly scrambling. They are absolute non-entities in almost anything we are doing or involved with in reality. They’re like the bullshitter class mates you had at school 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lee909 said:

 

 

What difference does it make they are in a different conference. They still take up marketplace and finances. Does he think that if they we t down bitters would start going to Liverpool games or the new stadium will mean tourist and a whole untapped fanbase will start visiting a team that hasn't won a thing in 30 years

 

 

Also many US cities host multiple teams in multiple sports. Look at New York 2 NFL teams on New Ork/New Jersey and Buffalo up state. The Nets and Knicks in the NBA,MLB Yankees and Mets,NHL Rangers and Islander, boxing regularly 

 

Tin foil hat brigade these lot

confused-so.gif

 

Traditionally the biggest cities in America had two baseball franchises. New York had the Yankees and the Giants, Philadelphia the Phillies and the Athletics, Boston the Red Sox and the Braves, St Louis the Cardinals and the Browns... now, the eagle-eyed will note the second franchise in each city upped stakes in the 50's. Why? Because the natives voted with their feet and the loser franchise had to find pastures new. Maybe Everton should see if Milton Keynes needs a franchise.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, deiseach said:

 

Traditionally the biggest cities in America had two baseball franchises. New York had the Yankees and the Giants, Philadelphia the Phillies and the Athletics, Boston the Red Sox and the Braves, St Louis the Cardinals and the Browns... now, the eagle-eyed will note the second franchise in each city upped stakes in the 50's. Why? Because the natives voted with their feet and the loser franchise had to find pastures new. Maybe Everton should see if Milton Keynes needs a franchise.

 

Stick Bramley Moore on a barge and float it out to Conwy 

 

No other teams to deal with and they can leave the corrupt premier league,FA and sky 6 and compete with the mighty Connah's Quay Nomads to be runners up in the Welsh leagues

 

 

 

Untitled.png

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Harry Squatter said:

Yes but liverpool gained no sporting advantage from the penalty..

Wouldn't a random drug test reveal the use of performance enhancers?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, johnsusername said:

 

I don't know any reasonable Blues when it comes to footy. They might be normal in an everyday setting, but mention football and they all turn into pricks, frothing at the mouth about corruption and red shite.

And ain't that the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a couple of cousins who are blues who are well educated, very (I mean VERY) successful careers, nice families who are sound until you talk about footy and then they become raving idiots.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Anubis said:


Yes. Payments deferred until this summer. They’ve been well had off. Imagine getting him for a season without having to pay anything but wages, patting yourself on the back, then finding out he’s dogshit and realising you’re still going to have to cough up for him. Cenk Tosun 2.0.

 

£30m as well.

 

What's great is they will have been fucked on it for ffp this season and only deferred payment for cashflow reasons, giving any new owner a time bomb. Except there may not be a new owner and they're running at such a loss, you could well see this as the thing that trips them into administration. It's fucking hilarious 

 

14 hours ago, Ronnie Whelan said:

That's it in a nutshell.

 

When he was going on about Heysel on another occasion, my brother who is a Blue, just said Everton's downfall is all of their own making and it started in the late 80s. To be fair, my brother does think they would have won the European Cup in 1986, but they were an excellent team then to be fair, so I can't begrudge him thinking that.

 

Don't be fair to them Ronnie. They weren't even the best team in their postcode in 1986, let alone the whole of Europe. 

 

11 hours ago, Pidge said:

Lakers and Clippers

Mets and Yankees

 

Not sure how no derby means more money.

Screenshot_20240131-220729.png

White sox and cubs to that list too. And I know fuck all about American sport and that was right off the top of my head. They're absolutely mental. 

 

Honestly, what will we do when they're gone? 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm not sure that's a boost.

 

Everton receive £30m funding boost

Everton have been provided a further £30m in funding from prospective owners 777 Partners, taking the total loan from the American investment firm to £180m.

The company agreed to purchase owner Farhad Moshiri’s 94% stake in September, but are will awaiting approval of the takeover from the Premier League.

777 were aiming to complete the deal before Christmas but checks remain ongoing and are hopeful of a resolution this month.

Everton’s appeal hearing over their 10-point deduction began this week and an outcome should be revealed by mid-February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Anubis said:

Yeah, I'm not sure that's a boost.

 

Everton receive £30m funding boost

Everton have been provided a further £30m in funding from prospective owners 777 Partners, taking the total loan from the American investment firm to £180m.

The company agreed to purchase owner Farhad Moshiri’s 94% stake in September, but are will awaiting approval of the takeover from the Premier League.

777 were aiming to complete the deal before Christmas but checks remain ongoing and are hopeful of a resolution this month.

Everton’s appeal hearing over their 10-point deduction began this week and an outcome should be revealed by mid-February.

Didn't they get 18m the other day? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...