The Official Raheem Sterling Thread (Part 412)

[Mathewbet1]

30m and Bony?

[Megadrive Man]

No.

[Megadrive Man]

£30 million and Aguero?

[Mathewbet1]

30m and Navas?

[kalasoma]

Navas is a winger and I don't see him staying in England much longer.

 

£60M or jog on.

[Mathewbet1]

City paid 28m for Bony lets put things in perspective, we should rinse them

[J-V]

We paid £35mill for Carroll we should definitely rinse them.

[Mathewbet1]

its on the bbc now, must be true innit

[Section_31]

£31.9 mil and at least one of Liam Gallagher's nose hairs.

 

30 mil sounds mad but the we paid more for Carroll. All bets are off with English players these days, even though they're all shite.

[J-V]

its on the bbc now, must be true innit

 

£25million cheeky cunts.  That buys you a Lallana.

[thompsonsnose]

£50 mill or do one.

Their overlords have stated they are on a mission to rebuild.

They must pay.

[Mathewbet1]

i think if we play hard ball we will get 50m, but how much do QPR get? 15%?

[Ranxerox]

i think if we play hard ball we will get 50m, but how much do QPR get? 15%?

 

We'll give them Mario in lieu.

[magicrat]

Talking to a Utd fan today , I've known the fella for years and he's not a knob and you can have reasoned chat to him about footie and life in general. He reckons we've been smart forcing the issue with Sterling and the lad will probably sign, He's really pissed off about De Gea leaving and reckons they should have been all over him 6 months ago to agree a new contract, 

[J-V]

i think if we play hard ball we will get 50m, but how much do QPR get? 15%?

 

I very much doubt we'll get £50mill for him.

[G Richards]

I'd do 40M and Dzeko. He is a seasoned striker who knows where the net is. Ings and Origi are young. If they do well they can surpass Dzeko, but we need experience right now.

 

Obviously if we can buy a better striker then let's do that with the cash, but I'm not sure what sort of striker we can buy. We have the role of young striker with potential sorted. We have the talented crock role sorted too. So we need someone experienced, who is good, to come in and do well.

 

Benzema would be ideal, but I don't think we can attract that sort of quality at the moment. So I'd do 40M and Dzeko, or 30M and Walcott.

[Mathewbet1]

Cant argue with that, but I doubt they will give us 40m plus a player.

[Russ Atmosphere]

What good is money to us?

[niallers]

£50 mill or do one.

Their overlords have stated they are on a mission to rebuild.

They must pay.

This, with fucking bells on. 60 million or do one.

[Section_31]

What good is money to us?

Fair point.

 

Shit isn't it? Football has now become the prospect of perpetual bumrape by Chelsea, city, barca and Madrid, taking our best players while we replace them with overpriced, mid table shite.

[Mark M]

What good is money to us?

haha this is actually very true. If we got 30 million for sterling and got to reinvest it we'd make a balls of it. If we got 100 million we'd do the same.

[Pureblood]

£50m, no less.  Ian Ayre is holding a thermal detonator. 

[Section_31]

£50m, no less. Ian Ayre is holding a thermal detonator.

This marketing man is my kind of scum. Fearless, and inventive.

[Grinch]

Still can't get over the money talked about for this over hyped wee shit.  If he's worth £30m then Lallana was money well spent (was it fuck btw)

[Section_31]

Still can't get over the money talked about for this over hyped wee shit. If he's worth £30m then Lallana was money well spent (was it fuck btw)

He's better than Lallana to be fair, and better than anyone we've bought in recent years, save sturridge and coutinho, that's not saying much I suppose.