Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Go fuck yourselves FSG


Neil G

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, RedKnight said:

What's the % we take for each shirt sold? If it's even 10% off the rrp of £70, and it's just the home shirt with 2m sales, you can see why FSG fancied the Nike deal.

 

4D0F5EC8-73C0-45F4-A53A-7A07993576D3.png
 

From my dodgy maths, this would be £58m just from the upfront payment and home shirt sales.

 

Given the ecru shirt is one of our best ever selling away shirts, the 3rd kit and the leisurewear, you’d think this will well exceed the £70m estimate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RedKnight said:

What's the % we take for each shirt sold? If it's even 10% off the rrp of £70, and it's just the home shirt with 2m sales, you can see why FSG fancied the Nike deal.

It was a £30m base fee then 20% of merchandise which covers every LFC Nike product. So that would be £28m just for the home shirt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, an tha said:

Man City getting more sponsorship money than us is so laughable it is beyond bent.

 

A total piss take.

Just a pity us, Man Utd and Chelsea are unknowns or we might have a royal blue segment of £20m for naming rights.too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sir roger said:

Just a pity us, Man Utd and Chelsea are unknowns or we might have a royal blue segment of £20m for naming rights.too.

I know.

 

How we can compete with a name as rich in history and with decades of success and fame around the world, and a massive worldwide fanbase as manchester city, i just don't know.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The £580m will go up again next year with the new shirt deal, more sponsors and the Nike deal. Matchday revenue will probably break the £100m barrier once the ARE is expanded. I think we've had about 8 extra home games with all the Cup competitions. 

 

Peter Moore said a few seasons ago that the aim was to break the £500m revenue barrier to be a top club.  Looks like the club will be exceeding £600m soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Elite said:

No excuse to not massively back Jurgen in the summer now.

 

Two great midfielders and another forward will do.

Tariq Lamptey to rotate with Trent

Mount/Gallagher to eventually replace Hendo

A target man type to replace Origi/Taki

 

That’s the dream. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aRdja said:

Tariq Lamptey to rotate with Trent

Mount/Gallagher to eventually replace Hendo

A target man type to replace Origi/Taki

 

That’s the dream. 

Only if you polished this off before bed last night.

 

C048C7F2-7703-42D7-A684-4F282694E1BA.jpeg

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't there also be some financial boost from being the last English team standing in terms of the TV pot money split? Certainly for the final anyway, as we'd have had to share it with City had they not suffered a terribly unfortunate and saddening mishap.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Dr Nowt said:

Won't there also be some financial boost from being the last English team standing in terms of the TV pot money split? Certainly for the final anyway, as we'd have had to share it with City had they not suffered a terribly unfortunate and saddening mishap.

I thought this was a thing too.

 

The relatively small difference between us and Utd show why teams are desperate to get top 4 even if they are crap.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sir roger said:

I thought this was a thing too.

 

The relatively small difference between us and Utd show why teams are desperate to get top 4 even if they are crap.

Definitely. Also, handily shows us how much United will be short by next year, just as they attempt a much-needed rebuild.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, aRdja said:

Tariq Lamptey to rotate with Trent

Mount/Gallagher to eventually replace Hendo

A target man type to replace Origi/Taki

 

That’s the dream. 

Not sure any of those players fit what we do.

 

Gallagher is an interesting one where he looks great on TV but his underlying numbers in key area's are atrocious, that might be the role he's asked to play or the overall team tactics but a top club will need to be sure that it's scalable/an issue with age/development before looking at him as a legitimate signing for the amount he would cost.

 

Against midfielders he's in the bottom 11% for passes attempted, bottom 10% for pass completion, bottom 3% for progressive passes made, bottom 30% for progressive carries, yet scores highly in dribbles, touches in the attacking areas, progressive passes received, shots, goals.

 

Against attacking midfielders and wingers he fairs far worse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...