Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

It's mad that Jo Swinson enabled Brexit and Nick Clegg enabled austerity. For a small party they do punch above their weight, all of it bad.

Then try and claim the moral high-ground. Crazy eh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

It's mad that Jo Swinson enabled Brexit and Nick Clegg enabled austerity. For a small party they do punch above their weight, all of it bad.

 

Yes, those are some mad thoughts alright.

 

This is the Corbyn thread though, so perhaps we could stick the liberal-bashing elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

The Jewish Chronicle in yet another false story/lie backtracking... 

 

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/apology-marc-wadsworth-1.517269

Right at the top of their story page as well which I guess is worth a thumbs up. They always seem to be apologising.... how about just stop lying? They aren't arsed they lied, they're arsed they got threatened with legal action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Right at the top of their story page as well which I guess is worth a thumbs up. They always seem to be apologising.... how about just stop lying? They aren't arsed they lied, they're arsed they got threatened with legal action. 

It's crazy how loose they are with the truth. But, remember, calling actual smears for what they are - smears - is downplaying antisemitism and is "jew baiting" or something or other. 

 

If the Jewish Chronicle said it was raining I'd look outside just to make sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

It's crazy how loose they are with the truth. But, remember, calling actual smears for what they are - smears - is downplaying antisemitism and is "jew baiting" or something or other. 

 

If the Jewish Chronicle said it was raining I'd look outside just to make sure. 

It's anti-semitic to pick them up on their lies mate so be careful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Yep, keep attacking the ethnic minority the party illegally discriminated against, it continues to be a really great look.


Just to confirm, then, criticising the Jewish Chronicle for consistently producing verifiably inaccurate and misleading journalism constitutes an attack on the Jewish community and is therefore antisemitic.

 

Is that right? Just so we’re clear what the parameters of the debate are here.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neil G said:

Just to confirm, then, criticising the Jewish Chronicle for consistently producing verifiably inaccurate and misleading journalism constitutes an attack on the Jewish community and is therefore antisemitic.

 

Is that right? Just so we’re clear what the parameters of the debate are here.

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

 

200 (1).gif

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

You’re English and you’re not being forced out of anywhere. Israel is one of the most powerful nations in the world. It isn’t going anywhere. Hope this helps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

You’re English and you’re not being forced out of anywhere. Israel is one of the most powerful nations in the world. It isn’t going anywhere. Hope this helps. 

You'll be telling me next that Margaret Hodge hasn't really had a suitcase made up in the hall for the last 40 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

You been snorting angel dust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I suppose if you pretend that the occasional unintentional inaccuracy constitutes something consistent, or unusual, where any newspaper is concerned, then you could get away with pretending that this constant gaslighting constitutes reasonable criticism.

 

We all know that the real crime of the Jewish Chronicle isn't to have published something unverifiable, which political parties (including Labour) do almost every single day, but having taken a position against Jeremy Corbyn and his rag-tag band of wanton bigots.

 

Even now after the EHRC report has proven that Jewish people were right all along about Corbyn's Labour, his cult-like racist followers continue to demean and demonise Jews - oh sorry, not Jews, but "Zionists" and "The Jewish Chronicle" and "Anything or anyone Jewish which we can pretend isn't actually an attack on Jews as a people".

 

Just one question. When we've all been forced out of this country - again - where are we supposed to go? You know, given that our homeland should be denied to us.

“We’ve” you’ve never even been to Israel you soft twat. You know full well picking up on an article BY the Jewish Chronicle apologising for THEIR lies isn’t anti-Semitic you’re just being your usual gobshite slanderous snide self. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...