Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

James Milner is....


TheHowieLama
 Share

Recommended Posts

After he's had a good game.. 'Totally underrated player! Any City fan would tell you he's worth his weight in gold! ETC ETC'

After a bad game.. 'Totally limited player. There's a reason he never got many games at CM for City. ETC ETC.'

Maybe the real answer is somewhere in the middle. Maybe we'll have to wait more than 5-6 games to know for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

He's not a good enough CM for any club with CL aspirations. He's far better out wide, but he doesn't want to play there (presumably because he wants more of the ball, and to feel more influential on the pitch).

I think he's harking back to his Leeds and Newcastle days when he looked a decent prospect in CM. He probably feels he's now a very good player and can return to that role, but he can't. 

 

He could probably get away with that role at West Ham or a modern day Newcastle or Villa, but whatever dream Rodgers sold him won't be honoured by Klopp.

 

I do think he's probably a model professional behind the scenes, and I don't doubt his commitment or physical fitness. He's just not good enough for the position he's in.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was on the wing and stunk the place out. Their first goal was schoolboy shit

 

Poor mans Beckham as he cant beat anyone to the line so his option is an early delivery into the box. It is quality but I'm not sure that will be enough as we cant have one of the three behind a lone striker unable to contribute goals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's had a few poor games, but he was excellent at the start of the season and planted a beauty of a cross onto Benteke's head last week.

 

Faint praise, but he starts over Allen any day for me.

 

Will be interesting to see how we shape up when Henderson returns. I miss the bobble-headed runner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to come over too harsh on the lad because I do like him and I've no doubt he'll make a fair contribution this season but thus far, I've been staggered by his lack of nous and in-game intelligence. If you sign a pro of his age and experience, you sort of expect them to be cute in how they put themselves about on the pitch, but he throws himself into challenges he has no hope of making like a rash kid. It's been doing my nut in. That challenge which led to Ramires' goal summed it up: why the fuck would you go to ground there? Azpilicueta still had so much to do before he could even get the cross in. Just jockey him, stand him up- don't make his mind up by committing yourself like that.

 

This is just a personal opinion, but I think it all comes back to the lack of tactical knowledge from a hell of a lot of English players. It seems to be a widespread thing endemic in the game in this country: poor reading of the game from commentators, glib clichéd soundbites from pundits, an appalling lack of tactical discussion in the papers. Listen to some fans discuss their teams woes and it'll more often than not be attributed to a 'lack of passion'. I'm not decrying passion as an attribute because you're buggered without it, but it's amazing how it's the go-to bone of discontent, when it could just as easily be a number of other things.

 

There seems to be this idea- which I personally think Milner is guilty of- is that unless you're at the centre of things, throwing your body in the way, getting on the ball as much as possible, then you're not influencing the game. Gerrard was a case in point when Rafa came in and told him bluntly, "you're running around too much." When he was pushed further up the pitch to play behind Torres, he played some of his best football in a red shirt. Even though he maybe saw less of the ball than, say, somebody like Xabi Alonso, all of his touches came in important areas of the pitch to have a positive impact of the game, rather than doing needless donkey work and knackering himself out.

 

It's the same, I think, with Rooney. Don't get me wrong, I think he's absolutely shot to pieces, but for a few years now he seems to have been indulged in this daft fantasy of dropping deep to receive the ball, get as many touches as possible and spray about Hollywood balls like some Cherry Blossomed Pirlo, albeit further up the pitch. His best season for that shower came the season after Ronaldo left (I think it was) when he was the focal point of the attack, again probably seeing less of the ball than he was used to, but getting something like 20 odd goals in the league.

 

Remember that daft experiment England had of putting Beckham in the holding position despite him having no defensive brain? Even when he played on the right for them, he was like a headless chicken, just trying to put himself about in some misguided attempt at influencing the game. It's like some widespread Scott Parker syndrome, where you're lauded simply for throwing yourself about, as if it's the easiest way of gauging passion. It seems as if it's lost on some people that one of the reasons they're throwing themselves about is because they're either going after balls they don't need to go for, or because they were poor positionally.

 

With Milner, he really needs to move out wide. In the current set up of two in behind the front man, I don't think there's a place in the side for him once Henderson comes back. If Klopp goes back to his Dortmund 4-2-3-1, I can see him filling in either the Grossreutz or Kuba role and doing a great job, but I don't think he's a centre mid at all.

  • Upvote 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to come over too harsh on the lad because I do like him and I've no doubt he'll make a fair contribution this season but thus far, I've been staggered by his lack of nous and in-game intelligence. If you sign a pro of his age and experience, you sort of expect them to be cute in how they put themselves about on the pitch, but he throws himself into challenges he has no hope of making like a rash kid. It's been doing my nut in. That challenge which led to Ramires' goal summed it up: why the fuck would you go to ground there? Azpilicueta still had so much to do before he could even get the cross in. Just jockey him, stand him up- don't make his mind up by committing yourself like that.

 

This is just a personal opinion, but I think it all comes back to the lack of tactical knowledge from a hell of a lot of English players. It seems to be a widespread thing endemic in the game in this country: poor reading of the game from commentators, glib clichéd soundbites from pundits, an appalling lack of tactical discussion in the papers. Listen to some fans discuss their teams woes and it'll more often than not be attributed to a 'lack of passion'. I'm not decrying passion as an attribute because you're buggered without it, but it's amazing how it's the go-to bone of discontent, when it could just as easily be a number of other things.

 

There seems to be this idea- which I personally think Milner is guilty of- is that unless you're at the centre of things, throwing your body in the way, getting on the ball as much as possible, then you're not influencing the game. Gerrard was a case in point when Rafa came in and told him bluntly, "you're running around too much." When he was pushed further up the pitch to play behind Torres, he played some of his best football in a red shirt. Even though he maybe saw less of the ball than, say, somebody like Xabi Alonso, all of his touches came in important areas of the pitch to have a positive impact of the game, rather than doing needless donkey work and knackering himself out.

 

It's the same, I think, with Rooney. Don't get me wrong, I think he's absolutely shot to pieces, but for a few years now he seems to have been indulged in this daft fantasy of dropping deep to receive the ball, get as many touches as possible and spray about Hollywood balls like some Cherry Blossomed Pirlo, albeit further up the pitch. His best season for that shower came the season after Ronaldo left (I think it was) when he was the focal point of the attack, again probably seeing less of the ball than he was used to, but getting something like 20 odd goals in the league.

 

Remember that daft experiment England had of putting Beckham in the holding position despite him having no defensive brain? Even when he played on the right for them, he was like a headless chicken, just trying to put himself about in some misguided attempt at influencing the game. It's like some widespread Scott Parker syndrome, where you're lauded simply for throwing yourself about, as if it's the easiest way of gauging passion. It seems as if it's lost on some people that one of the reasons they're throwing themselves about is because they're either going after balls they don't need to go for, or because they were poor positionally.

 

With Milner, he really needs to move out wide. In the current set up of two in behind the front man, I don't think there's a place in the side for him once Henderson comes back. If Klopp goes back to his Dortmund 4-2-3-1, I can see him filling in either the Grossreutz or Kuba role and doing a great job, but I don't think he's a centre mid at all.

 

Good post. At the minute Milner probably drops out but I wouldn't write him off entirely from picking up the pace and then Henderson probably replaces Can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent post Faustus mate, and pretty much exactly what I think about English/British players in general. I've mentioned in the past about how Beckham's performance against Greece all those years ago is hailed by the media in this country as one of THE great performances of all time. He was a key reason why England struggled so much in that game. While all the players would have been given tactical instructions to follow, he seemed to ignore them and charge about like a headless chicken, wanting to make his mark on the game. It left huge holes all over the pitch as teammates scrambled to cover spaces at the expense of following their given instructions, resulting in the hugely disjointed display we witnessed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...