Our new chairman

[BRAP]

'Why I'm missing Chelsea game' - Liverpool FC

 

 

Dont really know how to take that,what happens next season when we play them!!!!!!!! its more fucked up than I thought.

[Funkasy]

I think its fair. and i dont give a fuck if he was there or not.. JUST GET THE CLUB SOLD FAST!

[OnizukaEikichi]

whats with that? Better than showing up pretending to support us.

[esoteric]

Personally can't fault the fella, I think his attitude is spot on there.

[Pidge]

absolutely fair enough, respect and honesty. I wouldn't want him pandering to us and I hope he doesn't pander to dastardly and mutley either.

[Newport]

I can't come to the match on Sunday and show any of that emotion because that would be very disrespectful to the Liverpool faithful.

 

Actually tomorrow is a one-off opportunity to do it. Anyway, it's nice to see someone at the top of the club being honest for once.

[Dan Vito Corleone]

I suppose honesty is the best policy, but it says little for him as a professional.

[BolshieBastard]

'Why I'm missing Chelsea game' - Liverpool FC

 

 

Dont really know how to take that,what happens next season when we play them!!!!!!!! its more fucked up than I thought.

 

What a load of shit from 'our' chairman.

 

Plenty of people in football support another team while working for a club. Nearly every player does it.

 

I cant get my head around this, is he our chairman or not? He should be at that game in his professional capacity. What would he do if it was a European final, stay away!?

 

He knew this scenario would crop up at least twice a season when he was offerred the role or did he forget about this? Bet he's happy to turn up at shithouse bridge when we play down there too.

 

Jesus, you couldnt make this up.

[Antynwa]

No bullshit.

 

Which makes a change.

[Newport]

What a load of shit from 'our' chairman.

 

Plenty of people in football support another team while working for a club. Nearly every player does it.

 

I cant get my head around this, is he our chairman or not? He should be at that game in his professional capacity. What would he do if it was a European final, stay away!?

 

He knew this scenario would crop up at least twice a season when he was offerred the role or did he forget about this? Bet he's happy to turn up at shithouse bridge when we play down there too.

 

Jesus, you couldnt make this up.

 

WUM on display.

[Trumo]

What a load of shit from 'our' chairman.

 

Plenty of people in football support another team while working for a club. Nearly every player does it.

 

I cant get my head around this, is he our chairman or not? He should be at that game in his professional capacity. What would he do if it was a European final, stay away!?

 

He knew this scenario would crop up at least twice a season when he was offerred the role or did he forget about this? Bet he's happy to turn up at shithouse bridge when we play down there too.

 

Jesus, you couldnt make this up.

 

You seem to think he's a permanent appointment, despite him clearly putting on record the specific role he'll be taking on. He also said a few weeks ago that he won't come to this game. Why do you even care so much if he's there or not? Were you happy that the previous co-chairmen turned up to fixtures in their "professional capacity"?

[BolshieBastard]

WUM on display.

 

Kiss my ass!

 

You seem to think he's a permanent appointment, despite him clearly putting on record the specific role he'll be taking on. He also said a few weeks ago that he won't come to this game. Why do you even care so much if he's there or not? Were you happy that the previous co-chairmen turned up to fixtures in their "professional capacity"?

 

Not at all. But he's been appointed chairman of LFC. He doesnt have the right to pick and chose when he represents us.

 

You seem to think he has. Weird! But if that's your point of view so be it.

 

To me, he's full on chairman of LFC until he's no longer wanted or replaced.

 

And why do you ask stupid questions about the owners? No I wasnt happy they are in charge of the club. Now I know your next retort is going to be well why's it ok for them and not the current chairman.

 

And the answer is, because he's been supposedly brought in to present a different face for the club and to act as its chairman while trying to get a sale.

 

He's appointed so he should be here.

[Jarvinja Ilnow]

Kiss my ass!

 

 

 

Not at all. But he's been appointed chairman of LFC. He doesnt have the right to pick and chose when he represents us.

 

You seem to think he has. Weird! But if that's your point of view so be it.

 

To me, he's full on chairman of LFC until he's no longer wanted or replaced.

 

And why do you ask stupid questions about the owners? No I wasnt happy they are in charge of the club. Now I know your next retort is going to be well why's it ok for them and not the current chairman.

 

And the answer is, because he's been supposedly brought in to present a different face for the club and to act as its chairman while trying to get a sale.

 

He's appointed so he should be here.

 

He's appointed to SELL the club - nothing else. His presence isn't required as Purslow still has a role at the club. It's to his credit that he is being honest about his loyalties. As a football fan you should be able to empathise with him. You wouldn't go to watch Man U v Sunderland with your Manc supporting colleagues would you?

 

If he does a great business job for us and gets us sold to a decent owner then he has done more for us than any 'custodian' has done in 20 years.

 

Your pathological desire to be controversial does you no favours.

[Trumo]

He doesnt have the right to pick and chose when he represents us.

 

I'd like to see where it says that in his agreement. I'm not particularly fussed if the club chairman chooses not to attend games. This only bothered me with the leeches.

 

Now I know your next retort is going to be well why's it ok for them and not the current chairman.

 

And the answer is, because he's been supposedly brought in to present a different face for the club and to act as its chairman while trying to get a sale.

 

How long do you think he's going to hang around to fulfil his intended brief? Long enough for this scenario to crop up twice per season?

[Jennings]

I respect what he said there. For me, he should attend as a Chelsea fan.

 

I don't mind who he has in his heart, as long as he uses his business acumen to our benefit.

[Original202]

He's not really our Chairman in the true footballing sense of the word though is he?

 

At least he's being honest and not sat there with his scarf pretending he cares:

 

[BolshieBastard]

He's appointed to SELL the club - nothing else. His presence isn't required as Purslow still has a role at the club. It's to his credit that he is being honest about his loyalties. As a football fan you should be able to empathise with him. You wouldn't go to watch Man U v Sunderland with your Manc supporting colleagues would you?

 

If he does a great business job for us and gets us sold to a decent owner then he has done more for us than any 'custodian' has done in 20 years.

 

Your pathological desire to be controversial does you no favours.

 

I'd like to see where it says that in his agreement. I'm not particularly fussed if the club chairman chooses not to attend games. This only bothered me with the leeches.

 

 

 

How long do you think he's going to hang around to fulfil his intended brief? Long enough for this scenario to crop up twice per season?

 

You both are happy for someone appointed chairman of LFC, whatever their brief is, to pick and chose when he wants to represent the club at games.

 

I dont think that's reasonable. He should be professional. He should represent our club at all times while he's our chairman.

 

As for how long would he hang around, I dont know, But while he's here he should act like what he's supposed to be, our chairman.

[BolshieBastard]

He's not really our Chairman in the true footballing sense of the word though is he?

 

At least he's being honest and not sat there with his scarf pretending he cares:

 

 

I dont see why people compare him to those two who are totally discredited. This guy is supposed to be presenting a different face of LFC. Only he presents that face when he chooses!

[23_Carra_Gold]

I'd rather we had a football supporter as our chairmen over them two cunts

[Pidge]

I suppose honesty is the best policy, but it says little for him as a professional.

 

I don't see how it says anything about him as a professional. If some of our suitors were here he should be here playing the host, but if not there is no job for him to do, other than an empty PR showing. I'd rather he left the empty gestures and told us the truth.

 

as for bolshiebollocks, who is he meant to be representing the club to? Everyone knows the score with his appointment.

[JohnnyH]

That's all fair enough. He has been brought in to sell the club. I respect what he has said and don't think in any way it goes against his professionalism.

[Torvald Utne]

Mr Bastard, you are quite annoying.

[Torvald Utne]

I never tire of that photo, taken at the perfect moment.

[Monster Masch]

I think he has been pretty spot on, in all of his dealings so far.

[Kopite Pete]

Its fair what he is saying, maybe he should do a exclusive on SSN with a mug telling us he wants to win and he loves the passion.