Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

Just 5 years ago, only 11% considered the EU as a very important political issue.

 

https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/economy-immigration-and-healthcare-are-britons-top-three-issues-deciding-general-election-vote

 

It's mad how quickly it has become a fundamental dividing line; one that provokes the worst accusations and insults from both sides and a seemingly complete inability and unwillingness for people to find common ground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, skend04 said:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/02/irish-border-after-brexit-all-ideas-beset-by-issues

 

Leaked report indicating that there's no solution without problems for the Irish border. Just embarrassing this.

I don't think they care, I don't think they care about Scotland either (possibly one of the reasons Davidson has jumped ship). They probably view both as having very little impact on the Tory party's fortunes in the coming years (they'd probably be right). 

 

Jettisoning Scotland would also be a huge blow to Labour, as being able to take it back would be probably the only way it'll ever get a decent majority in Parliament again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Section_31 said:

No not at all. I can't stand May, but she's old school Tory.

 

She hates Corbyn more than probably any other Tory I've seen and the reason for that IMO is that she thinks he's a communist and s genuine threat to her view of Britain. 

 

That generation of Tory view Britain as the South East and its hinterland. The Royal Family (watch how she bows), the HMS Victory museum, Cornish ice cream and so forth. That's what conservatism is. You plant your flag on something you like and try and stop people from changing it, even if it's for the better.

 

The new breed, the Camerons and Osbornes, this lot, would sell everything she likes about Britain to a Russian oligarch for 50 pence. 

 

I think ultimately it's arbitrary whether one personifies the values of the old school or the new school when the result is the same. Looking at Theresa May's voting record for example, comparative to Cameron's, it's virtually identical. Cameron voted for more laws that promoted equality and human rights than May. He voted for more EU integration. Their records on welfare and benefits are the same. They both voted to increase taxes with the caveat of both voting against increasing tax for earners over £150,000 a year and both consistently voted to stop the Mansion tax. They both voted to increase tuition fees by £6000. Cameron voted for Proportional representation and May voted against. May voted for mass surveillance and mass retention of information, Cameron didn't. May voted against measures to try and curtail climate change, Cameron voted a mixture of for and against. May voted to privatise Royal Mail, Cameron didn't.

 

Now bearing in mind these votes are the things that actually change the country, not how May bows to the Queen or what she says in a pre-written speech to the survivors of WW2 - which is ultimately just Daily Mail fluff. I don't think you can arbitrarily impart morality on one, that you then claim the absence of in the other. If they both deliver the same thing, then the psychological underpinnings as to why are not important. The result is what matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Champions of Europe said:

The latest poll figures have them very strong, so I'd imagine the idea is that if they vote against him they are deselected. Then in a GE the tories clean up and Labour are decimated. They're claiming a damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

Going to be an interesting week.

About the size of it

Engineer an election, blame the remainers , purge the party and win a majority 

Still high risk despite what the polls may say today 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
38 minutes ago, Boss said:

Say what you want about Johnson but this is masterful politicking.

 

Well that remains to be seen. Not everyone swallows his bullshit. He's just relying on those who do, the type who believe the right wing media and have done with previous Tory leaders. I'm certain he'll cut his own throat at some point, his lies will definitely catch up with him. They have before, hence the fact he's been sacked from important positions a few times already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Boss said:

Say what you want about Johnson but this is masterful politicking.

It's really not

He's just throwing the dice and taking a huge gamble and even if he wins he's still left with the basic fact that Brexit is a really stupid idea with really bad consequences

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Section_31 said:

Jettisoning Scotland would also be a huge blow to Labour, as being able to take it back would be probably the only way it'll ever get a decent majority in Parliament again.

 

Labour would have won a healthy majority without Scotland in 1997, 2001 and 2005.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

Rebecca Long Bailey on the BBC was awful.  Just parroting lines. 

I heard most of that and I thought she was fine. They were trying to trip her up asking why Labour's policy wanted to ignore all those that voted for Brexit blah blah blah. Shite interviewing that only deserved soundbite responses. They can't go off this line because the media are happy to muddy the waters on what is actually a very clear policy line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

If he wins, yes.  He has circumvented the truth and democracy to get this far; we'll see whether he can carry it on to absolute power.

He's done well all right. He can look forward next month to blaming his political enemies for whatever transpires. He'll no doubt be creative in his description of them, something like 'the November criminals'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...