Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Russia v Ukraine


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SasaS said:

You mean, you are actually struggling with simple information such as VSRF counterattacked  the ZSU with 3 additional MBGs staffed with BARS1 and BARS2 and consisting of 17 MBTs, some BMPs and a company of IFVs and APCs, allowing the VDV to take control of the P-68 without employing the full force of the CAA and without having any fully functioning UAVs?

That would be an ecumenical matter.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-63911895

 

They actually had an exchange on the airport tarmac.

 

As if they were afraid one of them at the last second was going to refuse to keep up their end of the deal.

 

These are two of the three nuclear super-powers acting like a pair of third-graders swapping toys on the playground.

 

Bodes well for any potential Ukrainian peace negotiation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, polymerpunkah said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-63911895

 

They actually had an exchange on the airport tarmac.

 

As if they were afraid one of them at the last second was going to refuse to keep up their end of the deal.

 

These are two of the three nuclear super-powers acting like a pair of third-graders swapping toys on the playground.

 

Bodes well for any potential Ukrainian peace negotiation.

 

Maybe it was an homage to the cold war spy exchanges?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very interesting interview with a Ukrainian army officer for those who willing to go deeper, on Russian tactics around Bakhmut, difference to May / June, casualties, where do the army veterane see the war ending, war fatigue etc. English subtitles.

 

There are also new updates from Tom Cooper.

 

https://medium.com/@x_TomCooper_x/ukraine-war-12-december-2022-52037ae30a06

 

https://medium.com/@x_TomCooper_x/ukraine-war-12-december-2022-the-bakhmut-paper-e921301689f0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SasaS said:

A very interesting interview with a Ukrainian army officer for those who willing to go deeper, on Russian tactics around Bakhmut, difference to May / June, casualties, where do the army veterane see the war ending, war fatigue etc. English subtitles.

 

There are also new updates from Tom Cooper.

 

https://medium.com/@x_TomCooper_x/ukraine-war-12-december-2022-52037ae30a06

 

https://medium.com/@x_TomCooper_x/ukraine-war-12-december-2022-the-bakhmut-paper-e921301689f0

 

 

 

I've got some spare time today. I'm 15 minutes into that video, and it's fantastic to listen to (read)

 

Thanks for that.

 

edit: he's a cool cat, that Arty.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think both. And he isn't wrong.

 

They should receive longer range HIMARS and other missiles so they can hit controlling stations for Iran-supplied drones and such and the ban on hitting targets in Russia with western supplied weapons should be lifted. It serves no purpose any more.

 

There is a widespread misconception, mainly in the West, that there should not be an "escalation", as if Russia would not escalate if it could. Force and power is the only thing they respect. They would never start a war with a stronger opponent, that is why there would never be a nuclear response. If Ukraine had tools to respond "taking out" electricity, heating and water supply in western Russia the way Russia is doing to Ukraine, Russia would stop it within 24 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you say that?

I would say the most important part of his job right now is to ensure that Western support continues. At this point, the Ukrainians are totally dependent on Western (mostly American) arms deliveries. If they continue, then Ukraine will inevitably be able to force Russia to retreat to at least the pre-Feb lines eventually.

 

If they don't continue, if the West falters and then pushes them to negotiate from a position of weakness, then a lot of Ukrainians are going to be tortured to death in basements as Russia continues to hold sway over their territory.

 

So, when you look at it that way, it makes perfect sense for Zelensky to be going on American talk shows. Because sure, the people that follow things are going to be supportive of the Ukrainians, but if the likes of Tucker Carlson can get the "average American" to be tired of sending weapons to them then it can all end pretty quickly. And so I'm sure his staffers are well aware of that and putting him on television screens across the USA is aimed at preventing that from happening.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ne Moe Imya said:

Why do you say that?

I would say the most important part of his job right now is to ensure that Western support continues. At this point, the Ukrainians are totally dependent on Western (mostly American) arms deliveries. If they continue, then Ukraine will inevitably be able to force Russia to retreat to at least the pre-Feb lines eventually.

 

If they don't continue, if the West falters and then pushes them to negotiate from a position of weakness, then a lot of Ukrainians are going to be tortured to death in basements as Russia continues to hold sway over their territory.

 

So, when you look at it that way, it makes perfect sense for Zelensky to be going on American talk shows. Because sure, the people that follow things are going to be supportive of the Ukrainians, but if the likes of Tucker Carlson can get the "average American" to be tired of sending weapons to them then it can all end pretty quickly. And so I'm sure his staffers are well aware of that and putting him on television screens across the USA is aimed at preventing that from happening.

 

He’s building a brand. 
 

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

1101430104_400.jpg

 

1101360413_400.jpg

 

time-person-of-the-year-cover-trump-hitl

 

Wouldn’t use Time Magazine Man of The Year as barometer for anything considering some of their last selections. 

I think they select the person they consider has had most influence on the news, rather than the one they think is best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...