Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should the UK remain a member of the EU


Anny Road
 Share

  

317 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the UK remain a member of the EU

    • Yes
      259
    • No
      58


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Captain Willard said:

The pipes of peace is shit. I preferred it when we were calling each other cunts because we disagreed over the merits of trade deals. 

Watch this and (ignoring the commercial aspect) not be moved:

 

 

and stop arguing over the EU for fucks sake. Its Christmas day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another in the 'it must be going swimmingly' column...

 

B-WORD BANNED: The Telegraph reckons civil servants have been told to avoid using the word “Brexit” and instead refer to “31 December 2020” in a Whitehall style guide. Officials should only use the word when “providing historical context,” the document suggests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, skend04 said:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jan/01/uk-ministers-eager-to-ease-immigration-rules-for-indian-citizens

 

Average wage in India is £300/month. Farm workers even less. I can see why the Tories are desperate to have more of us over here. Don't know what leave voters will think mind as it's the opposite of what they were sold.

It was always going to be the consequence of a points based system that was blind to race and country of origin. Non European immigration will increase but it will be higher skilled applicants from Asia instead of unemployed unskilled white Eastern Europeans. Fundamentally it’s a less racist system. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rico1304 said:


anyone paid any roaming charges yet? Can’t wait. 


Loads.

 

The wife especially is taking to the new charges with the typical aplomb with which she encounters most financial considerations and just completely ignoring them.

 

’Oh, I didn’t realise it’d happen again. I thought after the first time they would have sorted it’

 

Madness, we’ve had two £300 plus bills as she just ignores the polite text telling you you can pay by the day for a fixed amount.

 

I’ve effectively bricked her phone when she isn’t in the UK now.

 

She was transiting through Qatar a few years back and thought this would be the opportune moment to download all her favourite podcasts for the next leg of the flight, £400.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:


Loads.

 

The wife especially is taking to the new charges with the typical aplomb with which she encounters most financial considerations and just completely ignoring them.

 

’Oh, I didn’t realise it’d happen again. I thought after the first time they would have sorted it’

 

Madness, we’ve had two £300 plus bills as she just ignores the polite text telling you you can pay by the day for a fixed amount.

 

I’ve effectively bricked her phone when she isn’t in the UK now.

 

She was transiting through Qatar a few years back and thought this would be the opportune moment to download all her favourite podcasts for the next leg of the flight, £400.

 

 

I meant in the EU. They started yesterday didn’t they?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Captain Willard said:

It was always going to be the consequence of a points based system that was blind to race and country of origin. Non European immigration will increase but it will be higher skilled applicants from Asia instead of unemployed unskilled white Eastern Europeans. Fundamentally it’s a less racist system. 

Free movement within the EU is "blind to race". The UK experience of large-scale immigration from the EU wasn't one of "unemployed unskilled white Eastern Europeans" at all. The opposite was true: the "benefits tourists" were always a fiction created to distract and enrage readers of shitrags like the Daily Heil; many East European workers in the UK were hugely overqualified for the jobs they took.

 

But, apart from that, great post!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Mudface said:

God, haven't seen those in years. My Nan always used to have them around, especially at Christmas.

I'm the same, I honestly haven't seen them in at least 30 years. 

 

I wasn't being a smart arse either with my original post, these sweets never even entered my mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Free movement within the EU is "blind to race". The UK experience of large-scale immigration from the EU wasn't one of "unemployed unskilled white Eastern Europeans" at all. The opposite was true: the "benefits tourists" were always a fiction created to distract and enrage readers of shitrags like the Daily Heil; many East European workers in the UK were hugely overqualified for the jobs they took.

 

But, apart from that, great post!

I didn’t use the phrase “benefits tourists” or say anything about welfare. 

 

I said the EU concept of free movement within the continent means free movement of mainly white people whilst restricting the entry to the continent of non white groups irrespective of their relative skills. This is undeniable. Points based immigration controls are not racist, country membership based controls are.
 

The EU is at its very core a collective endeavour to protect the interest of mainly white Europeans and their capital from foreign competition either in labour markets (free movement with country specific immigration controls on non European nationals) or imports (tariffs). You may think this a good or bad thing but that’s what it has always been, a big protectionist collective which has led to relatively higher food prices for decades, a huge transfer of wealth from tax paying workers to land owners and more recently high youth unemployment in member states. I really struggle to see why anybody on the left defends it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...