Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 21/02/20 in all areas

  1. James Cleverly says hi.
    7 points
  2. The weekend kicked off with a controversial game at Molineux as Wolves found themselves on the wrong end of another bizarre VAR decision as they were held to a goalless draw by Leicester. When Willy Boli headed in there was not a soul inside the stadium (or watching on TV) thought for a second there was anything wrong with it. Usually you have an inkling that VAR is going to take a look. It doesn’t always mean the goal will be ruled out but usually you have an inkling if something might be looked at and it's enough to make you hold off on the celebrations. Sadio’s winner at Norwich for example. I didn’t think it was a foul but I knew they’d be looking at it. This one though, there was hint of anything and not even the Leicester players appealed for a possible offside. For all the cryarsing about it though, technically it was the correct decision. You can argue all day about whether goals morally should be disallowed for that, but by the current laws of the game that was offside and Wolves don’t have a leg to stand on. Nuno Holy Spirit handled it with his usual good grace, and Conor Coady handled it with his usual arrogance and bitching. He remonstrated with Mike Dean as they left the field at half time and the ref admitted he didn’t know who was offside or why, he was just going by what he was told in the headset. Seeing Coady continually whining about VAR decisions this season has been a guilty pleasure of mine. He’s arguing about black and white shit. Offside is offside, regardless of whether he likes it or not. He was crying about the one that was disallowed at Anfield, and also wanting a handball when there wasn’t one. I’m sick of him spouting off when the officials have gotten the decisions right. What does he want them to do, ignore the rules just to suit him and his team? The disallowed Boli goal was a bizarre one but when VAR looks at it and puts their little lines in and the player is offside, there is no other option than to disallow the goal. Do we want to see goals disallowed for THAT? No, of course not. It’s ridiculous and there are probably at least 20 goals this season that have been disallowed that would never have been ruled out in the past. That’s a problem but haranguing referees over it is stupid as it’s not their fault. I'm all for giving them shit over their own mistakes, but this isn't that. The law definitely needs to change but until then VAR can only enforce it as it is, and like it or not (and I don’t think anyone does), Neto was offside. What does Coady want them to do, ignore the laws of the game just to make him happy? Fair play to him though, being in a shot with Mike Dean where you’re the one who is more arrogant and full of yourself is pretty much impossible for most people, but Conor pulled it off. Ronaldo might be the only man on the planet who can beat him on that front. Not gonna lie, if I had my way then Wolves would be on the wrong on VAR every week as I find it funny as fuck, albeit I do have sympathy for Nuno as he’s a top fella. Anyway, in summary Wolves had the better chances but couldn't score, and Choudhury finally got a red card that’s been months in the making. Reckless bastard him. Onto Saturday now and Southampton were surprisingly beaten at home by Burnley. I didn’t see that coming, but Burnley are fucking weird aren't they? They’re even more Bournemouth than Bournemouth. Seven games unbeaten, eight losses on the bounce, six game unbeaten run, seven games winless and rinse and repeat every season. I heard someone on the radio describe Burnley as a team that loses every game it’s expected to lose and wins every game it’s expected to win. That’s pretty accurate, although winning away at Southampton isn’t something I’d have expected them to do. Generally though that's what they do. They took the lead direct from a corner when Ings inexplicably moved out of the way of Westwood’s inswinger. No idea what he was thinking there but it was an embarrassing moment for him against his old club. Naturally he soon made amends with a thumping equaliser from 20 yards. 18 goals for the season now, great stuff from him. Southampton were doing all the attacking but they couldn’t make it count and out of nowhere Vydra blasted in a superb winner. That was his first goal since September 2018, which makes Benteke seem like Gerd Muller. In fairness he hardly ever plays. He plays more for the Czech Republic than he does Burnley, which is about as damning an indictment of the current state of Czech football as you’ll find. Onto Sunday now where both North London clubs were in action against relegation threatened sides. At Villa Park Toby Alderweireld put through his own net to give Villa the lead but then scored at the other end to cancel it out. Spurs were (correctly) awarded a pen by VAR. Reina saved from Son but was beaten by the rebound. Dean Smith wasn’t happy about it and he repeated an argument I’ve heard a few times lately but makes no sense to me. He said “forty thousand people in the stadium didn’t think it was a penalty, but it goes to a sterile environment and two minutes later a penalty is given”. What does the environment have to do with it? A foul is a foul, and that was a foul. Smith said it wasn’t a clear and obvious error, but it was. Refs can’t always see fouls clearly (especially when they’re registered blind, like Martin Atkinson) but it’s precisely for incidents like this that VAR was introduced. Fat Jon Moss was the VAR and he got it right, no doubt while saying “it’s not VAR’s fault you’re in a relegation battle”. (see what I did there? Gold that is. That’s why you pay your money). The one point Smith made that I agree with is that Atkinson should have taken a look at the monitor himself as that decision should really be made by the ref on the field. All VAR should be for in that situation is to tell him he might want to have a look as there’s a reasonable case that it was a foul. And it was a foul. It took a replay to show it as you can’t possibly tell in real time, but a foul is a foul. No point crying about it, but I do think it’s probably easier to take if it’s the referee on the field who makes the decision. Maybe that was the point he was trying to make, but as I say, I’ve heard it said a few times lately that it’s not right that someone who isn’t involved in the ebb and flow of the game is making decisions. I don’t really see how it makes any difference to the decision itself but I’m in total agreement that I’d rather the on field referee look at the monitor for any ‘judgement’ calls and leave the black and white issues to VAR. Engels (who had conceded the pen) headed the equaliser from a Grealish corner, but Villa’s hearts were broken in stoppage time when Engels missed the ball and Son ran through to win it. Mad how Spurs have had so many 3-2 wins since Mourinho came in. I don’t see them getting too many more though, not now that Son has joined Kane in the treatment room. That bus of Jose's won't be clocking up much mileage between now and May. As for Villa, the more I watch them the more I have to confess that Jack Grealish wins me over. I know I know, you’re disappointed in me but I can’t help it. I’m doing my best to fight it, as I’ve been ripping him for years and he looks like such a bad knobhead. The hair, the tan, the shinnies…. the fact he plays for Villa… all of that goes against him and it’s why I’ve always slated him. Yet it’s really hard to keep disliking him as he’s fucking brilliant and he gives everything he’s got every time he steps onto the field. I love his commitment and attitude. At the end of this game he went over to console Engels and it was just a genuine, heartfelt gesture. He’s been an inspiration to that team and if they stay up it’s entirely because of him. I feel as though this new found respect and grudging admiration I have will be short lived though, as come the end of the season he’ll be on the move and unless we buy him (unlikely, as we don’t need any more midfielders) then he’s going to be playing for the likes of United or Spurs and normal service will be resumed. He’ll be back to being a Poundland Lee Hendrie again. The other game on Sunday saw Arsenal wallop Newcastle at the Emirates. I watched the first half and Arsenal looked abysmal, so I was shocked when I checked back in later with a couple of minutes to go and they led 3-0. Even Ozil scored. That's how bad Newcastle must have been. Lacazette added a fourth in stoppage time and the celebrations for that were, shall we say, a little excessive. You’d have thought it was a winner in a cup final. Stuff like that really annoys me. That’s the problem with Arsenal’s players. They have zero self awareness. So often I find myself squirming at their lack of awareness of their reality. Look at where you are in the table lads. You have nothing to celebrate, you fucking bums. Arsenal’s squad is jam packed with fucking losers who just don’t get it. They’re genuinely embarrassing and it angers me far more than it should. Monday night was a fucking farce. I have no love for Chelsea but what a stitch up that was. A referee from Manchester and a VAR ref from Manchester. Seriously, how is that allowed to happen? Chelsea had two goals disallowed by VAR (one correctly, one not) but the main issue was that neither Anthony Taylor nor Neil Swarbrick felt that Slabhead Maguire should have been sent off for kicking Batshuayi in the balls. I’ll give Taylor a pass on that one because he might not have seen it and also because at least his shitness is consistent. He didn’t give a red card to Son the other week for more or less the exact same thing so at least there are no double standards there. He missed the Son one on Rudiger but VAR corrected his mistake. When that happened, virtually everyone other than Mourinho said it was the right call. So how come Maguire got away with it, especially as if anything the intent was even more clear in this one? Of course Maguire would later score, as he tends to do. The cunt did the same thing at Anfield last season when he also escaped a clear red card. What is it with this big fucking dope, has he got diplomatic immunity on red cards because he plays for England? Chelsea should be kicking up all manner of stink over this as what happened just wasn’t right. Their first disallowed goal was a scandal too. Fred pushed Azpilacueta into Williams. Yes, Azpilacueta then shoves the United defender in the back, but he couldn’t stop himself after being shoved by Fred. I don’t understand how you can give a foul against Azpilacueta there. I’ve seen it justified on the basis that Fred’s push isn’t enough to justify a penalty, so that has to be ignored and it’s the foul by Azpilacueta that has to be given. Bollocks. One foul only takes place as a result of the other. If Fred doesn’t push him then Azpilacueta can stop himself from running into Williams. I had missed the start of this game but I tuned in seconds before Chelsea 'scored' to make it 1-1. I was watching the replay as they did the VAR check and it seemed so obvious to me that I didn’t think there was anyway they’d disallow that goal. I was genuinely shocked but at that point I had no idea the VAR was a manc. I actually felt sorry for Chelsea and it takes a lot for that to happen. I want to hate Lampard but he’s made it really difficult as he’s been such a good guy all season, and even their team these days doesn’t really have any villains. Under Mourinho the first time around I hated every single one of the fuckers, but now? There’s no-one I actively dislike. They really can’t beat shite teams at home though and they seem to come unstuck in the same way all the time. Shit teams sit back and frustrate them, and then take advantage of set-pieces or counter attacks. That’s exactly what happened again. United are fucking shit and it seems like the only gameplan Solskjaer has it to sit back and try and play on the break. He’s had some decent results playing that way, especially against Chelsea, and it’s a black mark against Lampard that he hasn’t been able to figure out how to overcome that. In fairness to him though it’s not easy when you’re up against twelve men as well as the VAR official. Until someone actually lodges a formal complaint about manc refs being allowed to referee manc teams though this will continue. Mike Dean isn’t allowed anywhere near Liverpool or Everton unless we’re playing each other, and he isn’t even from Liverpool, he’s a Tranmere fan from the Wirral. So how come mancs are allowed to do City and United games? That’s the question other clubs should be asking, as Chelsea aren’t the only ones to have been on the receiving end of the manc mafia. Staying with the dishonesty amongst mancs theme, City had a predictably comfortable time against sorry West Ham at the Etihad on Wednesday. They won 2-0 without breaking sweat and Moyes seemed content to just not get battered. I often joke about Phil Foden and his token ‘eight minutes at the end of a game’ appearance stat padding, but it’s amazing how often it happens. He got six minutes at the end of this one. I mean, if the kid is as good as they’re trying to tell us he is, why don’t they ever let the little scrote play? There were more seats than fans on view, although obviously it’ll be listed as a full house on City’s books as the Sheikh buys up any unsold tickets. Apparently that's ok though. After the week they'd had I thought there'd be a show of defiance and the fans would show up in force to back their team. Maybe they stayed away in disgust at the cheating? What? It could be that. Ok ok I'm taking the piss. I'd actually respect any of them who did stay away on those grounds. The reality is they didn't show because it was West Ham in midweek in a re-arranged game. The ones who did show up sang “Fuck off UEFA, we’ll see you in court”. Always the victims, eh? Laughable that they think they’re being hard done to. Their own club hasn’t even denied any of the allegations, they’ve just launched a scorched earth campaign about how everyone has it in for them (and some are even playing the ‘islamophobia card’). Firstly, they’ve cheated. For years. They’re still cheating now in fact and the only reason nobody is talking about that (or investigating) is because the leaked emails only go up to 2016 or something. I read something about how they’ve been operating within FFP parameters these past couple of years but based on what? The fact there are no leaked emails to prove otherwise. Don’t believe for one second that they aren’t still paying people off the books, over inflating the value of sponsorship deals and having their owners subsidise the payment of those deals. Had it not been for their emails being hacked though they’d still be getting away with it. Secondly, not only are they cheating, but they’ve repeatedly lied to try and cover it up. And that’s what UEFA are getting them on. They cheated and they tried to deceive the authorities to cover it up. They haven’t denied it because they’re bang to rights. Yet their sportswashed fans think UEFA are the bad guys in all this and it’s a conspiracy to hold them back and protect the ‘big club cartel’. Fucking idiots. Looking at all those empty seats against West Ham I can’t help but wonder what some of the players must be thinking. Sergio Aguero and Kevin De Bruyne for example. They must be getting even more money than anyone realises, as these are players who could grace any club in the world, yet they’re playing in front of 25,000 morons for a club that nobody outside of Manchester gives a shit about. We got a full house for an u23 side playing League One opposition. If you’re a player at a top side you must look at that and then compare it to your own fanbase. Same with the trophy parades. I saw a quip made on Twitter that the difference between us and City is that the video of their trophy parade has a third of the views that one of Robbo and Milner talking about biscuits had. I’m sure our players know how good they have it here, but I reckon City players have to have noticed it too. It’s human nature. We know they’re well paid but I’d be willing to bet they’re making well more money than anybody ever suspected. If the ban is upheld and there isn’t a mass exodus, then we’ll know for sure, because realistically there’s no way ANY of those top stars (or Guardiola) would stay there without Champions League football. Still, maybe the ban will be a good thing for them. Those fans who were there in League One but have mysteriously fucked off might return, and who knows, maybe if all the rats flee the sinking ship then Foden might finally get to start some games.
    5 points
  3. Have got other priorities, sorry. Have made a new character on Skyrim recently and need to level up heavy armor, block, enchanting and two-handed. No time for anarchism threads with all that on my plate.
    5 points
  4. Why the fuck would city be treated with the same respect as Liverpool.
    5 points
  5. I'm sure youre a good lad in real life, but the image you paint to me is a running to fat bloke with a bit of a beard in too tight chinos and brown shoes wandering round some city with headphones on and a costa coffee stuck out like a dalek with a smirk saying "yah" and "lols" all the time before going back to the office to fanny about with spreadsheets.
    5 points
  6. The reply to this artetas_biggest_fan Player Valuation: £2.5m Yesterday at 11:07 PM New Add bookmark #33 On a broader point (really addressed to much older blues), when did the RS overtake us in size? Or were the clubs always level up until a point in time? In the Dixie era were we the biggest club in the land? (that last one is more for historians) Up until the 1960s, both clubs had five league titles, we had two cups. Both clubs were able to generate 50k plus attendances. Something changed after that. Was it simply the Shankly impact (and legacy) that drove them on to another level? It was the decade where the city was the centre of pop culture, and they had an anthem that came from that sound. Having the city name must have had an effect also. As a club they seemed to forge a strong identity that became known to the wider public, while Catterick kept us in the shadows (that’s just how it seems anyway without having gone through it). Like Quote Reply Report maccavennie Player Valuation: £70m Forum Supporter Today at 12:09 AM New Add bookmark #35 Your a massive knobhead, the biggest on here you Kopite piss soaked Aldo loving ferret
    5 points
  7. It's like some blert who bought a set of medals at an antique store demanding to be treated with the same respect as the war hero who earned them in combat.
    4 points
  8. Actually I think the problem is that it is all style over substance. Series 2 was simply messing with chronology and showed the ending at the beginning. All in all its been caught out. Like a pretty but dim woman its nice to look at but too empty and pointless to keep you interested for too long
    4 points
  9. Leamington Spa is 45 miles from everywhere. Even Leamington Spa.
    4 points
  10. Ole might not have had the time to reply to me but he did what I asked.
    4 points
  11. Can’t remember if I said on here or not, but the vet gave him a clean bill of health after his 3 weeks intensive treatment. Repeated his faeces tests and none of the stages of lungworm were present, including larvae etc, putting weight back on, back to his normal self. It was the first case they’ve ever had where the dog has survived, she thinks because it’s often hard to spot until it’s so far advanced dogs are being brought in at death’s door. Think we just got very lucky, touch wood. Thanks for asking mate.
    4 points
  12. Appendix 20.3 of their planning application isn't going to go down too well...
    4 points
  13. I would happily hurl puppies into the sea for this woman if she asked me to.
    3 points
  14. hello hello Sterling - "When you see the white shirt you know exactly what the club stands for - it's massive. But, at the same time, I have a contract with City now and I have to respect this. But it's a fantastic club"
    3 points
  15. His creeping to Real could see him change his name to Raheem Euro.
    3 points
  16. Raheem Sterling believes Manchester City are "not treated with the same respect" as Liverpool. The winger joined the Reds from Queens Park Rangers' Academy as a 15-year-old in February 2010, but left many fans upset when he forced through a £44million move to the Etihad in 2015 after turning down what Brendan Rodgers had described as “an incredible deal” in terms of a new contract offer earlier in the year. He has now spoken to Spanish media outlet AS about the fact no City players won the Ballon d'Or of PFA Player of the Year awards despite claiming every domestic title last term. The 25-year-old said: "Especially in the last year where we have won the domestic quadruple including the league, to not have a player winning PFA Player of the Year kind of speaks for itself really. "The award was given to a Liverpool player who had a fantastic season but I look at previous seasons as well when Yaya Touré scored 20 goals from midfield and he didn't win Player of the Year. "Also, Sergio Agüero has been at the club for more than seven years and has scored unbelievable goals during this time, yet none of City’s players have won it. "I think that certain players are not treated in the same way when they are from different football clubs across the country and across the world over the past few seasons. The first year we won the league, De Bruyne was unbelievable and they gave it to another player. "Every year we win a major trophy and it's given to an opposition player. It's that sort of thing that doesn’t depend on us, but we keep going." Sterling was pushed for his thoughts about this and declared that City weren't treated with the same respect as Liverpool. "It’s something everyone can see," he added. "It is impossible to win the league for four or five times and none of the players were Player of the Year. "Every team which wins the league has a player who wins Player of the Year, for sure. "So, this year Liverpool win the league and a Liverpool player will win the Player of the Year for sure. "We win the league for five times and we were not treated with the same respect." https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/raheem-sterling-says-man-city-17788548 Could be that people realise you're a bunch of cheating cunts. You cheating cunts.
    3 points
  17. Started following a group called 'Terrible Art in Charity Shops' and someone found this at a shop in St.Helens.
    3 points
  18. Your a massive knobhead, the biggest on here you Kopite piss soaked Aldo loving ferret What a response. No arguing with that.
    3 points
  19. The Retrospective Cup sounds like something Everton would play in.
    3 points
  20. Hold on, you can only disagree with people who are smarter than you? Damn, I've been doing it wrong this whole time.
    3 points
  21. It’s the vapid position taken up by people who see the right generally descending to fascism and the left generally fighting to improve the conditions of the working class/minority populations/etc and pretend it’s morally equivalent and *they* are in fact the only reasonable people because the key to politics is to find a balance between objectively very good things and utterly horrific dehumanising things. tldr - people like stronts and rico
    3 points
  22. Klopp should have replied with a letter calling him a bitter little gobshite and enclosed a crisp packet filled with his own piss. Jurgen has gone down in my estimation here.
    3 points
  23. When I first heard about the European ban, I said to De Bruyne, ‘You should move to Parma, son.’ PARMA, SON PARMESAN Cheese No you shut up
    3 points
  24. Ha ha. Seriously, though, nobody who supports a footy team from Liverpool should be using “bin dippers”.
    2 points
  25. 2 points
  26. Our success aside, the internet hasn't helped things. People seem angry, jealous and resentful about everything these days.
    2 points
  27. It is a bit weird that City haven’t had a PFA player of the year. But it’s voted for by the footballers so he seems to be saying that none of his industry respect his club which is quite telling. Maybe his fellow professionals are not that keen on financial doping
    2 points
  28. Insensitive Basterds?
    2 points
  29. From a time before beards. What a bunch of ugly fuckers. Fellaini looks clinically insane
    2 points
  30. *sees Centrists and Neoliberals threads at the top of the forum*
    2 points
  31. A vote chaser who's principles dance around like that carrier bag at the end of American Beauty ?
    2 points
  32. Oh, and "lols" will be negged aRdja. It hurts me to do it, but it's for your own good mate.
    2 points
  33. And on weekends, flying Emirates first class to Maldives making copious notes on the progress of class struggle observed along the way.
    2 points
  34. Oh, this is amazing... ‘I think it looked worse on tv. Maybe those who were getting hit by the rain moved further back to avoid getting wet. Which would make it look emptier than it actually was’ So they moved to the empty seats further back you fucking halfwit? I am genuinely enjoying how utterly stupid they are. Its ok, you’re not a big club or a big draw despite the best interest of a bunch of repressive dictators and crooks, it’s fine and ok to admit.
    2 points
  35. He was on every fucking month. Allowing him to develop the "loveable buffoon" image rather than the "massive, hateful fucking cunt" reality. It can be filed away next to allowing Nigel Farage on QT every week despite the fact his party had one MP and he wasn't it. Good old BBC. YEAH BUT LOCAL RADIO AND ATTENBOROUGH. Comforting stuff for the all the people they've helped to fuck over.
    2 points
  36. 3-2-1 with Ted Rogers?
    2 points
  37. Yeah, like I said, I kind of felt that in the first series after a few episodes. Lost was the same- great premise, then they piled so many 'mysteries' on top that it was obvious it would never be resolved sensibly. Still, provides fodder for fanatics on the web who think they see symbolism everywhere.
    2 points
  38. Some men just want to watch their football team burn. And blame the other team across the park...
    2 points
  39. Punching down isn’t a natural byproduct of being “fucking smart” is, I suppose, my point. Not trying to have an argument about it or anything, I realise you said it wasn’t always to his credit.
    2 points



×
×
  • Create New...