Jump to content

  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Go fuck yourselves FSG

Neil G

By Neil G,
in FF - Football Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Mil-ing Around
Mil-ing Around

Controversial to many on here but I think they've been good owners. Some real shady cunts tried to buy us from Tom & Jerry.   FSG came in, stabilised us, kept us at Anfield and redevelop

dave u
dave u

Based on replies to my tweet about this, the defence seems to be that because the club pays tax they're entitled to do this. Another argument is that there are wealthier businesses doing the same and

Grinch
Grinch

Same old cuck banging the FSG drum. Shame the French coppers didn’t give him a good kicking.

Posted Images

Moo Veteran

Moo

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, MegadriveMan said:

https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1592621479631679488?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1592621479631679488|twgr^8fdbeb8d10c3831d263cc4eb47135076402cddac|twcon^s1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.empireofthekop.com%2F2022%2F11%2F15%2Fgenuine-suitor-for-liverpool-takeover%2F

Screenshot_20221115-231415_Chrome.jpg

 

As if FSG give a toss who the buyer is.  It's all about the money, highest bid wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Babb'sBurstNad Grand Master

Babb'sBurstNad

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Moo said:

 

As if FSG give a toss who the buyer is.  It's all about the money, highest bid wins.

 

Ironically, I think they do give a toss. If they were more disaster capitalists, picking up distressed assets then flipping them they wouldn't give a shit. But they're eyeing prestige sports franchises now, and they'll be scrutinised as buyers too. If an owner has an attachment to his team, he won't sell to people who'll burn it in the long term. FSG have to play both roles now - prospective buyer and seller.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Numero Veinticinco Grand Master

Numero Veinticinco

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Moo said:

 

As if FSG give a toss who the buyer is.  It's all about the money, highest bid wins.


Well, the highest bidder will win but they’re going to want to make sure they don’t fuck the club over, it reflects terribly on an investment group if they do that, so any sporting franchise they want to buy in the future will ask questions. I wouldn’t say it’s the primary concern but it is probably a factor. And look, they’re going to want a rich cunt for more than just one reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Supremolad Experienced

Supremolad

Posted
Posted

A study from University of Liverpool had concluded that earlier this year Liverpool had 273m available for transfers without breaching Premier League FFP limits.

 

In essence according to Premier League FFP rules, FSG could also have legally overspent on transfers up to a limit of 105m in losses over the past 3 years. And covering such losses with their personal money is deemed acceptable. So when people say FSG could spend more from their pockets to fund transfers, it is legitimately allowed and not considered cheating.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10108067/amp/How-Premier-League-club-spend-transfers-FFP-rules.html

Screenshot_20221116_130356_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mook Grand Master

Mook

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Supremolad said:

A study from University of Liverpool had concluded that earlier this year Liverpool had 273m available for transfers without breaching Premier League FFP limits.

 

In essence according to Premier League FFP rules, FSG could also have legally overspent on transfers up to a limit of 105m in losses over the past 3 years. And covering such losses with their personal money is deemed acceptable. So when people say FSG could spend more from their pockets to fund transfers, it is legitimately allowed and not considered cheating.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10108067/amp/How-Premier-League-club-spend-transfers-FFP-rules.html

Screenshot_20221116_130356_Chrome.jpg

 

Another Everton first.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daisy Veteran

Daisy

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Supremolad said:

A study from University of Liverpool had concluded that earlier this year Liverpool had 273m available for transfers without breaching Premier League FFP limits.

 

In essence according to Premier League FFP rules, FSG could also have legally overspent on transfers up to a limit of 105m in losses over the past 3 years. And covering such losses with their personal money is deemed acceptable. So when people say FSG could spend more from their pockets to fund transfers, it is legitimately allowed and not considered cheating.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10108067/amp/How-Premier-League-club-spend-transfers-FFP-rules.html

Screenshot_20221116_130356_Chrome.jpg

 

Usher looking a bit silly now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrenchEyeGlass Grand Master

FrenchEyeGlass

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

Well, the highest bidder will win but they’re going to want to make sure they don’t fuck the club over, it reflects terribly on an investment group if they do that, so any sporting franchise they want to buy in the future will ask questions. I wouldn’t say it’s the primary concern but it is probably a factor. And look, they’re going to want a rich cunt for more than just one reason. 

 

So have they fucked the club over if they sell us to another set of minge bags who can't afford to buy players for us? Or will it be okay because they're not dirty arabs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrenchEyeGlass Grand Master

FrenchEyeGlass

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Supremolad said:

A study from University of Liverpool had concluded that earlier this year Liverpool had 273m available for transfers without breaching Premier League FFP limits.

 

In essence according to Premier League FFP rules, FSG could also have legally overspent on transfers up to a limit of 105m in losses over the past 3 years. And covering such losses with their personal money is deemed acceptable. So when people say FSG could spend more from their pockets to fund transfers, it is legitimately allowed and not considered cheating.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10108067/amp/How-Premier-League-club-spend-transfers-FFP-rules.html

Screenshot_20221116_130356_Chrome.jpg

 

@dave u should record another podcast and explain to everybody that the reason we have not utilized the 273 million we could have is because of klopp. even if he wanted to spend any money, spending money is cheating. we should instead be trying to grow world class footballers in the fertile soil behind anfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrenchEyeGlass Grand Master

FrenchEyeGlass

Posted
Posted

I am going to assume that if you think Klopp has actively decided not to spend money that is sat there on the table waiting for him, because of "reasons", then you also think he's a dumb cunt. Because you are literally posing that he is fucking thick enough to think his squad is good enough without investment.

 

Apparently when Klopp said "we have bills to pay" to explain why we didn't buy any defenders during the 2021 crisis, he actually meant he felt too stressed spending the millions the club had made available to him because he hadn't sorted his leccy bill at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Numero Veinticinco Grand Master

Numero Veinticinco

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, FrenchEyeGlass said:

 

So have they fucked the club over if they sell us to another set of minge bags who can't afford to buy players for us? Or will it be okay because they're not dirty arabs?


If they sell to somebody shit, they absolutely will be fucking the club over. Your last sentence is misguided. At best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrenchEyeGlass Grand Master

FrenchEyeGlass

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:


If they sell to somebody shit, they absolutely will be fucking the club over. Your last sentence is misguided. At best. 

 

It was not aimed at you, but the overall narrative. I absolutely hate man city and newcastle and everything their owners are doing (anyone can see some of the shit I post on their respective threads), but there is a real xenophobic undercurrent to the way owners are being assessed superficially.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...