Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?


Sugar Ape
 Share

Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Corbyn remain as Labour leader?



Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, A Red said:

Something else I dont agree with Corbyn on - scrapping university tuition fees. Surely it is a particularly socialist thing to do, getting the rich to pay, rather than the government, for something they can afford that benefits them hugely. 

That theory only works if you believe the sole beneficiary of higher education is the graduate (which would be a distinctly un-Socialist point of view). 

 

Also, of course, no Socialist would accept the notion that higher education should be the sole preserve of the rich.

 

Corbyn's argument  (which makes sense to me) is that if a society trains engineers, doctors, artists, architects, accountants, etc. then literally everybody in society benefits. Having an educated population is a public good that should be publicly funded.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Anny Road said:

I'd love to see the tipping point for income tax/inheritance tax/ capital gains and indirect tax, VAT etc.

For instance if income tax was on a sliding scale up to say 80% and all indirect tax was abolished. No VAT on fuel etc.

I don't have an issue so much as top rate tax being 50 pcnt. It's getting cunts to pay it and not use tax dodging schemes. More importantly getting multi-national companies to pay their whack. I would tax companies on their UK turnover if based over-seas which would encourage them to be UK based and produce proper profit and loss accounts not some fictional transfer pricing scam.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, magicrat said:

I don't have an issue so much as top rate tax being 50 pcnt. It's getting cunts to pay it and not use tax dodging schemes. More importantly getting multi-national companies to pay their whack. I would tax companies on their UK turnover if based over-seas which would encourage them to be UK based and produce proper profit and loss accounts not some fictional transfer pricing scam.

That's a given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

If you earn less than £80,000 a year Labour will not increase your income tax rate for 5 years and will increase the minimum wage to £10 an hour.

 

People who earn over £80k will pay a bit more. 

 

Good of them to set the threshold for what a high earner is just above an MP's salary of £79,468.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2003, Watson voted in favour of going to war with Iraq, and subsequently voted consistently against an investigation into the war.

Watson was campaign chair for Labour in the Birmingham Hodge Hill by-election in July 2004. The campaign drew criticism for its dirty tactics, particularly a Labour leaflet proclaiming "Labour is on your side – the Lib Dems are on the side of failed asylum seekers", for which Watson later admitted responsibility and expressed regrets.

 

Guy's practically a commie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sir roger said:

In 2003, Watson voted in favour of going to war with Iraq, and subsequently voted consistently against an investigation into the war.

Watson was campaign chair for Labour in the Birmingham Hodge Hill by-election in July 2004. The campaign drew criticism for its dirty tactics, particularly a Labour leaflet proclaiming "Labour is on your side – the Lib Dems are on the side of failed asylum seekers", for which Watson later admitted responsibility and expressed regrets.

 

Guy's practically a commie.

 

I remember that, Labour wanted to remove children of failed asylum seekers from their parents and put them into care. Lib Dems were obviously opposed to that. Good old Labour. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Strontium Dog said:

 

I remember that, Labour wanted to remove children of failed asylum seekers from their parents and put them into care. Lib Dems were obviously opposed to that. Good old Labour. 

Agree with you on this one, that was shameful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, sir roger said:

In 2003, Watson voted in favour of going to war with Iraq, and subsequently voted consistently against an investigation into the war.

Watson was campaign chair for Labour in the Birmingham Hodge Hill by-election in July 2004. The campaign drew criticism for its dirty tactics, particularly a Labour leaflet proclaiming "Labour is on your side – the Lib Dems are on the side of failed asylum seekers", for which Watson later admitted responsibility and expressed regrets.

 

Guy's practically a commie.

I think you misunderstand what it means to be on the left or right, mate. Would you consider Jon Cruddas and Andy Burnham right wing? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why have a go at Tories for Islamophobia? It's embedded in the Labour Party too via the pro-Israel groups as they support the apartheid state and remain silent on Palestine.

 

Not gonna stop people like Owen Jones pretending otherwise though. Conservatives have bad problems too obviously, but Jones is just deflecting as he goes on about them. He made a video that he posted on twitter recently, it's basically saying that conspiratorial thinking always leads to anti-Semitism again, also that it's no good talking about Israel or Zionist lobbies.

 

He's getting called out for it regularly now and there has to be a reason he's doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Red Phoenix said:

Why have a go at Tories for Islamophobia? It's embedded in the Labour Party too via the pro-Israel groups as they support the apartheid state and remain silent on Palestine.

 

Not gonna stop people like Owen Jones pretending otherwise though. Conservatives have bad problems too obviously, but Jones is just deflecting as he goes on about them. He made a video that he posted on twitter recently, it's basically saying that conspiratorial thinking always leads to anti-Semitism again, also that it's no good talking about Israel or Zionist lobbies.

 

He's getting called out for it regularly now and there has to be a reason he's doing it.

Yeah, the overly simplistic framing of “Labour = antisemitism, Tory = islamophobia” is infuriating. Both parties (actually, all parties) have elements of both, and other racism/bigotry. It’s just less prevalent in labour

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Hank Moody said:

I think you misunderstand what it means to be on the left or right, mate. Would you consider Jon Cruddas and Andy Burnham right wing? 

 

 

Don't know much about Cruddas other than vaguely remembering him trying to help the unions a bit when Blair was Labour leader. Liked Burnham and was disappointed when he jibbed it for the mayoral role. consider him as very slightly left of centre & certainly the next most acceptable candidate to me in the Corbyn election win.

 

I am no student of political tomes and am happy to be pointed in the right direction of left / right pure descriptions , but on a basic gut level I do not see an MP with warmongering racist tendencies as having  much of a claim to be on the left of the Labour party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Don't know much about Cruddas other than vaguely remembering him trying to help the unions a bit when Blair was Labour leader. Liked Burnham and was disappointed when he jibbed it for the mayoral role. consider him as very slightly left of centre & certainly the next most acceptable candidate to me in the Corbyn election win.

 

I am no student of political tomes and am happy to be pointed in the right direction of left / right pure descriptions , but on a basic gut level I do not see an MP with warmongering racist tendencies as having  much of a claim to be on the left of the Labour party.

I’m not sure I’d say any of those have racist tendencies, nor would I call them warmongering, but I think it’s fair to say you can be left wing and still favour military intervention in certain circumstances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...