Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Cancel Culture


aRdja
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, AngryofTuebrook said:

Not really sad, though, is it? There's no harm done by only playing the censored version. That song, with its "adult themes" should never be on the radio rotation alongside Shakey and Wizzard. 

I agree that you should either play it or not play it, it is extremely sad every time a work of art gets censored to suit a political agenda. Language and "adult themes", characters in that song is what makes it great.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was the shite bandwagon jumping twat last year eh? 

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/fairytale-of-new-york-ban-bbc-christmas-alex-dyke-kirsty-maccoll-pogues-a9231846.html

 

Radio 2 are still playing it uncensored anyway but as far as I can tell Radio 4 aren't playing it at all which is the real outrage here. 

 

https://radiotoday.co.uk/2020/11/fairytale-of-new-york-is-not-banned-at-the-bbc/

 

Just wait until Fox hears about BMG dropping Morrissey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

In which a woman complains that a restaurant selling Chinese food is owned by white people, and gets it shut down. 
 

https://twitter.com/evystadium/status/1329110893133783040?s=21

 

These people are fascists.

 

The entire concept of cultural appropriation needs to die in a fire.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

In which a woman complains that a restaurant selling Chinese food is owned by white people, and gets it shut down. 
 

https://twitter.com/evystadium/status/1329110893133783040?s=21

Romans used to dress as German barbarians because it became fashionable, every culture has evolved from something we all didn't just fucking pop up in our current borders fully formed and entrenched. Celts didnt eat rice dishes because it doesn't fucking grow here, the same with about a billion other fucking things. The calls of cultural appropriation are mostly a huge pile of bollocks not all but definitely mostly.  If some white weirdo wants dreadlocks then let him its his fucking hair he can do what he likes, completely fucking irrelevant if historically it was worn as an act of defiance. Its like people want more segregation and no celebration of what we all are humans, people just living our lives often inspired by different cultures.

 

As for oppression being a white thing take a look at the world now and through out history. Power corrupts all races.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to hear The Pogues song with the "faggot" line, just bang it on on YouTube or Spotify or whatever. You get to hear it as originally recorded, plus you can play it whenever you want instead of waiting for it to come on the radio. 

 

Easy solution. But, some people want to indulge in phony culture war for their own vested grifting interests. 

 

All I Want For Christmas Is You by Mariah Carey is a far superior Christmas ditty anyway. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

Romans used to dress as German barbarians because it became fashionable, every culture has evolved from something we all didn't just fucking pop up in our current borders fully formed and entrenched. Celts didnt eat rice dishes because it doesn't fucking grow here, the same with about a billion other fucking things. The calls of cultural appropriation are mostly a huge pile of bollocks not all but definitely mostly.  If some white weirdo wants dreadlocks then let him its his fucking hair he can do what he likes, completely fucking irrelevant if historically it was worn as an act of defiance. Its like people want more segregation and no celebration of what we all are humans, people just living our lives often inspired by different cultures.

I think there's some merit in the argument that it's best not to trivialise or monetise stuff that is sacred or deeply important to someone else.  Most of the time, people who do stuff like (for example) wearing a pastiche of a Native American headdress to a festival probably do it thoughtlessly.  Once it's pointed out that you're inadvertently upsetting people, then anyone who isn't a dick will just stop.

 

That's not to say that some claims of cultural appropriation aren't horseshit: obviously, some are, but some are valid.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Canadians?

 

Not all of them but some of them.

 

3 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I think there's some merit in the argument that it's best not to trivialise or monetise stuff that is sacred or deeply important to someone else.  Most of the time, people who do stuff like (for example) wearing a pastiche of a Native American headdress to a festival probably do it thoughtlessly.  Once it's pointed out that you're inadvertently upsetting people, then anyone who isn't a dick will just stop.

 

No, I don't agree. Just because something is important to someone else doesn't mean anyone else needs to account for that. Nobody has a right not to be offended. People just need to stop being so precious.

 

It'd be like me getting upset that the cafe over the road from the office here sells bagels with cream cheese and bacon, breaking not one but two kosher dietary laws. When the reality is, I don't give a shit. People can eat/wear/frot whatever the hell they want.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I think there's some merit in the argument that it's best not to trivialise or monetise stuff that is sacred or deeply important to someone else.  Most of the time, people who do stuff like (for example) wearing a pastiche of a Native American headdress to a festival probably do it thoughtlessly.  Once it's pointed out that you're inadvertently upsetting people, then anyone who isn't a dick will just stop.

 

That's not to say that some claims of cultural appropriation aren't horseshit: obviously, some are, but some are valid.

Yeah there's a sensitivity involved but if it stretches to selling a dumpling its absurd and the kind of thing that cheapens even the valid arguments for it.  Plus there will be Native Americans selling headdresses, fancy dress gear, souvenirs because its makes them a living and others who are against it.  You can't please everybody or pander to every single person's sensitivities. There been examples of white girls wearing traditional oriental dresses and some people going spare about it while others say they are proud to see others celebrate their culture and style. Who do you pander too. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

No, I don't agree. Just because something is important to someone else doesn't mean anyone else needs to account for that. Nobody has a right not to be offended. People just need to stop being so precious.

Nah. People who are so self-centred and self-important that they never give a fuck about upsetting anyone else are cunts; even worse than the people you (bizarrely) call Fascists because they whinge about a wanky deli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Nah. People who are so self-centred and self-important that they never give a fuck about upsetting anyone else are cunts; even worse than the people you (bizarrely) call Fascists because they whinge about a wanky deli.

Well they didn’t winge, they got it shut down.  What if you decide that upsetting people is an ok price to pay? Lots of people got very upset about the Life of Brian, but they were very correctly told that didn’t matter. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Well they didn’t winge, they got it shut down.  What if you decide that upsetting people is an ok price to pay? Lots of people got very upset about the Life of Brian, but they were very correctly told that didn’t matter. 

Wait till Biggus Dickus hears of this 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Well they didn’t winge, they got it shut down.  What if you decide that upsetting people is an ok price to pay? Lots of people got very upset about the Life of Brian, but they were very correctly told that didn’t matter. 

Sometimes it is OK to do that.  But nobheads who bang on about their inalienable right - nay, duty! - to be obnoxious cunts are just the absolute worst. 

 

What's wrong with good manners, kindness and basic human decency?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Sometimes it is OK to do that.  But nobheads who bang on about their inalienable right - nay, duty! - to be obnoxious cunts are just the absolute worst. 

 

What's wrong with good manners, kindness and basic human decency?

Like, say, Frankie Boyle? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...