Quantcast
Summer 2019 Transfer Thread - Page 292 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Anubis

Summer 2019 Transfer Thread

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, FrenchEyeGlass said:

Klopp's own words are "as weird as it sounds, we could not afford him"

 

The reason he adds 'as weird as it sounds' is because he fucking knows it sounds absolutely ludicrous to suggest we couldn't afford him or another major signing. 

I think he just means that we have a financial model for transfers and spending £20m or so for a nine month loan doesn’t fit into it.  

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, FrenchEyeGlass said:

Klopp's own words are "as weird as it sounds, we could not afford him"

 

The reason he adds 'as weird as it sounds' is because he fucking knows it sounds absolutely ludicrous to suggest we couldn't afford him or another major signing. 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheHowieLama said:

Where?

“It sounds a bit strange, but we could not afford it, we have already spent the cash that we got for him,” Klopp told Goal.

 

The German also revealed that he did not want to sell Coutinho 19 months ago but Barca’s offer proved too good to turn down.

 

“We were reluctant to hand him over, but Barcelona forced us with money, so to speak,” he added.

 

“The move makes sense for both sides. He’s a super player and a great boy. He is a world-class footballer who can change games in the right environment.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Lizzie Birdsworths Wrinkled Chopper said:

Maddock saying the total package for a 9 month loan to us was over £40m fee and salary, before paying all of Coutinho’s tax so his wages were net.

 

The bailiffs will be arriving shortly.

That does sound strange. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, aws said:

I think he just means that we have a financial model for transfers and spending £20m or so for a nine month loan doesn’t fit into it.  

My memory isn’t that short. I remember when our financial model was completely absent.

We had our best player Suarez on less than half the wages Downing was on. You can’t have that.

As long as our financial model doesn’t stop us buying top dollar for players like VVD and Allison, I can live with Cou not returning on loan. Let’s just stick to the transfer model we’ve adapted, it’s not been a disaster so far has it?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure everyone on forum looking a big money signing more when we were at our peak we had subs like Fairclough , Walsh and Rosenthal to throw on and change a game. It could well be Divock this year or a combination of him and Brewster all I know is when listening to radio in the 70s and 80s and I heard Fairclough or Walsh coming on cert we were going to win . Hope big div can have a super sub year like the back end of last season .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted Coutinho back but that's a piss take of a price. He's failed at Barcelona. We were right to walk away. Still no excuse why we didn't strengthen in other areas though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JustTosh said:

 

We had our best player Suarez on less than half the wages Downing was on. You can’t have that.

 

What with us dicking about over the fee as well I'm amazed we got him given the incompetence of the recruitment at that time. Imagine if Spurs had pulles their fingers out and got him at that point. A soon to be world class Bale, Harry Kane on the rise, Modric and Suarez.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, El Dangerous said:

What with us dicking about over the fee as well I'm amazed we got him given the incompetence of the recruitment at that time. Imagine if Spurs had pulles their fingers out and got him at that point. A soon to be world class Bale, Harry Kane on the rise, Modric and Suarez.

Rodgers sacked sooner and not allowed to do the long term damage he did.   Add in the fact Suarez won fuck all anyway and you could say we'd have been better off. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JustTosh said:

My memory isn’t that short. I remember when our financial model was completely absent.

 

 

We had our best player Suarez on less than half the wages Downing was on. You can’t have that.

As long as our financial model doesn’t stop us buying top dollar for players like VVD and Allison, I can live with Cou not returning on loan. Let’s just stick to the transfer model we’ve adapted, it’s not been a disaster so far has it?

 

 

Negged for saying "Cou" instead of Coutinho 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, JustTosh said:

My memory isn’t that short. I remember when our financial model was completely absent.

 

 

We had our best player Suarez on less than half the wages Downing was on. You can’t have that.

As long as our financial model doesn’t stop us buying top dollar for players like VVD and Allison, I can live with Cou not returning on loan. Let’s just stick to the transfer model we’ve adapted, it’s not been a disaster so far has it?

 

 

Except it would appear our financial model is we can't sign players like alisson and VVD unless we make a major sale. 

3 hours ago, Boss said:

I wanted Coutinho back but that's a piss take of a price. He's failed at Barcelona. We were right to walk away. Still no excuse why we didn't strengthen in other areas though.

You think 8m plus his wages is a piss take? Seems a pretty decent price to me. We get 2.5m for Wilson who made his premier League debut this week. 5m for gruic, who is behind even lallana in our midfield pecking order. We even get 2.25m a year for karius don't we? And that cunt doesn't save shots and throws some in the goal. We can't expect to pick up an attacker who is a regular starter for Brazil for no wages, of course we need to pay his wages and they're about the same as the mancs pay rashford. I just don't get what part of this deal is over priced. Personally I just think we're tight and controlling costs is the aim for this season. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

Except it would appear our financial model is we can't sign players like alisson and VVD unless we make a major sale. 

You think 8m plus his wages is a piss take? Seems a pretty decent price to me. We get 2.5m for Wilson who made his premier League debut this week. 5m for gruic, who is behind even lallana in our midfield pecking order. We even get 2.25m a year for karius don't we? And that cunt doesn't save shots and throws some in the goal. We can't expect to pick up an attacker who is a regular starter for Brazil for no wages, of course we need to pay his wages and they're about the same as the mancs pay rashford. I just don't get what part of this deal is over priced. Personally I just think we're tight and controlling costs is the aim for this season. 

Boss is on about the special high price just for us of 40million was a pisstske.  Which it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

Except it would appear our financial model is we can't sign players like alisson and VVD unless we make a major sale. 

You think 8m plus his wages is a piss take? Seems a pretty decent price to me. We get 2.5m for Wilson who made his premier League debut this week. 5m for gruic, who is behind even lallana in our midfield pecking order. We even get 2.25m a year for karius don't we? And that cunt doesn't save shots and throws some in the goal. We can't expect to pick up an attacker who is a regular starter for Brazil for no wages, of course we need to pay his wages and they're about the same as the mancs pay rashford. I just don't get what part of this deal is over priced. Personally I just think we're tight and controlling costs is the aim for this season. 

 

As J-V says, I was talking about the £40m fee with tax payments on top being an outrageous price. The deal that Bayern got was good. We weren't offered that deal, they tried to fleece us. Bastardo (not you, Barca!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Lizzie Birdsworths Wrinkled Chopper said:

Maddock saying the total package for a 9 month loan to us was over £40m fee and salary, before paying all of Coutinho’s tax so his wages were net.

 

The bailiffs will be arriving shortly.

That seems very fishy , anybody else running with it ?

 

Face saver ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, J-V said:

Boss is on about the special high price just for us of 40million was a pisstske.  Which it was.

Except it wouldn't have been 40m. Maybe the 1st quote was, but they let him go for 8m plus wages makes it about half that including wages. The price Barca were willing to accept is out there. Do you really think Barca would cut off their nose and effectively ban us from signing him ? I'm pretty sure coutinho's agent is smart, there must be a restraint of trade thing in there somewhere. But Barca are desperate for cash, so of course they asked a lot at the start, but equally we know their price, it's what they dealt for. If the stumbling block to this deal was Edwards couldn't make that price, we should be asking questions why not. Why does he get let off the hook? To me the price seems fair that Munich paid. If we fail to make the same deal, we don't know how to negotiate. I suspect it's more like we didn't want to because we didn't want to spend any money. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Boss said:

 

As J-V says, I was talking about the £40m fee with tax payments on top being an outrageous price. The deal that Bayern got was good. We weren't offered that deal, they tried to fleece us. Bastardo (not you, Barca!).

I bet Munich weren't offered that deal at 1st ask too. That's how negotiations work. If we weren't capable of getting Barca to a price they were willing to accept, we need to question our negotiating techniques or our desire to make any deal.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Barry Wom said:

Except it would appear our financial model is we can't sign players like alisson and VVD unless we make a major sale. 

You think 8m plus his wages is a piss take? Seems a pretty decent price to me. We get 2.5m for Wilson who made his premier League debut this week. 5m for gruic, who is behind even lallana in our midfield pecking order. We even get 2.25m a year for karius don't we? And that cunt doesn't save shots and throws some in the goal. We can't expect to pick up an attacker who is a regular starter for Brazil for no wages, of course we need to pay his wages and they're about the same as the mancs pay rashford. I just don't get what part of this deal is over priced. Personally I just think we're tight and controlling costs is the aim for this season. 

 

I was definitely in the ‘bring him back’ camp but if he’d come in on the wages he’s on at Barca he’d instantly be be our highest earner. I wouldn’t be comfortable with that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Captain Turdseye said:

 

I was definitely in the ‘bring him back’ camp but if he’d come in on the wages he’s on at Barca he’d instantly be be our highest earner. I wouldn’t be comfortable with that. 

Well you need to think about "in the bring him back" camp. Because he wasn't going to take a pay cut and Barca didn't need to subsidise his wages, their deal with Munich showed that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

Well you need to think about "in the bring him back" camp. Because he wasn't going to take a pay cut and Barca didn't need to subsidise his wages, their deal with Munich showed that. 

 

Oh, aye, probably naive on my part but I like to think if we’d have brought him back on a permanent deal he’d have had to at least drop down to parity with Salah/Mane. We’d have found out just how much he wanted to come back anyway. 

 

I wouldn’t want him on loan if he was earning more than our best players so I’m glad we didn’t. It just sends the wrong message. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Can I just reiterate that Martin Tyler is a cunt. He will have been up since 4am practising his 'Maaaaaarsheeeeaaalll' scream. 
    • Everton player obstructs a defender. Didn’t look anything in it to be honest, but would have been excellent for the fume if West Ham had equalised.
    • Goal line technology is perfect, offsides a tad more complicated in some cases but generally could be handled by technology. Everything else those incompetent officials seem to be fucking up royally.    If they're this bad with the video technology available, then it goes to show just how utterly bad they were before, although that won't be news to most football fans.    Today will be interesting, this and the city game are the ones that I've been concerned about. This one because let's be honest here, the mancs spent years getting favourable decisions from officials. VAR has proven so far it's anything but logical and as previous posters and myself have said, is just one ref covering another refs arse.    I don't know which of the idiots they have in the VAR booth today but it's them that might fuck us over.     
    • Not like the English to make an absolute meal of something so easy. 
    • Jürgen Klopp has achieved many things in his time at Liverpool, but a win at Old Trafford is one box that he is yet to tick.

      Under the German’s tenure, the Reds have registered at least one league away victory against  Man City, Tottenham, Chelsea and Arsenal.
        Currently the away record against Man United sits at two draws and one defeat. 

      The two teams also met in the Europa League in Klopp’s first season where Liverpool ran out 3-1 winners on aggregate with the second leg locked at 1-1.

       Liverpool’s last victory on the red side of Manchester came five and a half years ago (3-0).

      Liverpool head back to the home of their arch-rivals in fine form, having not dropped a point all season from their eight league games.

      In contrast, Man United are in somewhat of no-mans-land currently sitting in 14th position with just nine points on the board.

      But as we have seen many times in this fixture, ladder positions doesn’t mean a lot when it comes to deciding the end result.

      While some managers will try to downplay the record, Klopp has embraced it, seeing it as another challenge for his highly ambitious squad.

      The Mirror reported Jürgen as saying:

      “Winning there would be a big next step. It’s not a step we have to make otherwise we cannot develop, no. 

      “But, of course, for our own history with me it is obviously something we have not achieved yet.

      “This team wrote their own story and made their own history and this would be another step.   "But we cannot make it by simply talking about it.

      “ We have to go there and play the best football we can play, with the biggest balls, being ready for each challenge, fighting for every ball, all that stuff. That is what we have to do.”  

      One player who will also be looking to break a drought against this opposition is Mo Salah with the Egyptian yet to score a goal or register a assist in four games.

      Klopp believes it is not a major worry for his star, and just like the team, he would see it as a challenge to embrace with all he has.

      “It is difficult to know what he’s thinking. If someone had told me he’d never scored against United I would have said, ‘Really?’ 

      "I suppose the more you go without scoring against an opponent there may be one moment when you start scoring against them.

      “All these games are big tests. I don’t see it as a specific test for him, but, yes, it is a big test. 

      "And sometimes there will be ‘old-school challenges’ and you have to be ready for them.

      “That is how it is. But there is a reason for these stories, just like our history against United away, such as the stadium or the intensity of the game.”

      Three points for the Reds and a brace for Mo would certainly equate to a pretty special Sunday.

       
      View full article
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

×