Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Jose Jones said:

Surprised Burns and Buttler are that high.

I think just being in the side for a long time bumps you up the list quite quickly.

 

Sibley's run in the team got him up to 66 despite the fact he had about one innings above about 23 in that time. Bairstow and Malan the other side of the coin.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lifetime fan said:


Surprised Curran even qualifies for the test rankings. 

He averages 25 which isn't much worse than all of batsmen bar Root and Stokes. 

 

Burns, Buttler, and Bairstow are the next best, and all average between 32 and 34.

 

I actually think Curran is possibly a better batsman than bowler in the test team. Although, I wouldn't be picking him.

 

Woakes, when fit to play, should, and probably will, be England number eight for the next few years. Top cricketer him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

He averages 25 which isn't much worse than all of batsmen bar Root and Stokes. 

 

Burns, Buttler, and Bairstow are the next best, and all average between 32 and 34.

 

I actually think Curran is possibly a better batsman than bowler in the test team. Although, I wouldn't be picking him.

 

Woakes, when fit to play, should, and probably will, be England number eight for the next few years. Top cricketer him.


Isn’t there a minimum number of appearances over 2 years to be included in the ICC rankings? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

If India don't win this series, considering how bad England's batting line up is, there will rightly be huge criticism for not picking Ashwin.

 

 

I hope I’m wrong but I can’t see how India don’t win at least one of the remaining Tests, which should secure a series win. Of course the weather might have a say in that. 
 

Looking forward to this morning though. Might be a decent toss to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YorkshireRed said:

I hope I’m wrong but I can’t see how India don’t win at least one of the remaining Tests, which should secure a series win. Of course the weather might have a say in that. 
 

Looking forward to this morning though. Might be a decent toss to win. 

We basically have to take loads of early wickets in their first innings to win games against them.

 

England are a half decent team when they're on top. When the going gets a bit tougher they're atrocious.

 

I don't want to say they're a bunch of flat track shithouses but they're a group of flat track shithouses.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

We basically have to take loads of early wickets in their first innings to win games against them.

 

England are a half decent team when they're on top. When the going gets a bit tougher they're atrocious.

 

I don't want to say they're a bunch of flat track shithouses but they're a group of flat track shithouses.

Flat track shithouse cunts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...